1 / 11

Information Architecture WG: Report of the Spring 2010 Meeting

Information Architecture WG: Report of the Spring 2010 Meeting. May 6, 2010 Dan Crichton, Chair Steve Hughes (presenting) NASA/JPL. Summary Technical Status. Information Architecture WG Goal: Develop a reference architecture and a formal representation method

dewey
Download Presentation

Information Architecture WG: Report of the Spring 2010 Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Information Architecture WG:Report of the Spring 2010 Meeting May 6, 2010 Dan Crichton, Chair Steve Hughes (presenting) NASA/JPL

  2. Summary Technical Status • Information Architecture WG • Goal: Develop a reference architecture and a formal representation method • Working Group Status: Active _X__ Idle ___ Will be terminated __ • Working Group Summary Situation: • Working Group Summary progress: • Good progress on wrapping up final issues on the registry-repository model • Development of an information service architecture concept paper • Interactions with the Reference Architecture BoF and Super SIG regarding development of a SOA style information architecture • Problems and Issues: • Overlapping meeting times makes cross-coordination difficult

  3. Executive Summary • Good discussion on reviewing issues of the Registry Repository reference model • Some updates required after attending the “Boot Camp!” before red book submission • Still addressing issues of how to link CCSDS and ebXML • Several good discussions on the Information Service Architecture and review of the concept and recommendations • Recommendation is to form a Information Service Architecture BoF which will begin working on a charter in London • A collaboration will take place with SM+C to review their common services and MAL for consideration as part of the broader information service architecture and to map it to a common layered model of a CCSDS information system view • Some actions needed by WG chairs to help in the analysis of overlaps (information, service, infrastructure, messaging) layers

  4. Progress Achieved • Registry Repository • IA/IPR have agreed on a schedule for release of the registry-repository books • An updated registry repository reference model was distributed to the IPR and IA groups prior to the meeting • Comments provided from NASA; ESA committed to providing comments, but not received yet. • An information model WB was also distributed (as a planned green book), but some discussions of whether we should just point directly to the ebXML RIM • Feedback provided and plans for completing the red book including reviewing the CCSDS procedures to make sure it goes smoothly • A concept paper on the Information Service Architecture as produced along with a presentation. The presentation was given in the IPR/IA and Super SIG groups. It was agreed that a BoF should be created which will eventually include elements from IPR/IA and potentially MOIMS. • Development of a WG charter will help to flush out the work products

  5. Schedule • Registry/Repository: Address RIDS and changes to the WB and prepare for red book changes (August 2010) • This will require some re-work • Continue to evolve the Information Service Architecture WB (July 2010) • Distribute to the Super SIG stakeholders • Hold NASA TIM in September 2010 • Begin charter planning for ISA

  6. Open Issues • Registry/Repository: Current plan is to publish a magenta book, but there are discussions here (ranging from publish as Green to publish as Blue) • Information Architecture: Continued efforts are needed to coordinate cross-area activity in SOA; suggest CESG direct WGs to help identify overlaps of common services, information models, and messaging

  7. Action Items • Send meeting notes, presentations and comments to IAWG • To: Info Arch WG Members • Due: June 1, 2010 • Send ISA concept paper • To: SIG members • Due: July 2010 • Distribute updated registry repository reference architecture • To: IPR and MOIMS members • Due: August 2010

  8. Resource Problems • There may not be enough resource commitments from member agencies to achieve deliverables, however, we continue to see increasing involvement • Need to identify overlaps in WGs, in terms of information service architecture, and determine how to best leverage what’s been done and to move it towards a more widely used standard within CCSDS

  9. Cross Area WG / BOF Issues • Need to also get to the stakeholders in the other groups who have SOA-related patterns and standards, to work together • SEA, MOIMS and CSS areas in particular need to work together with support from the AD down • Need to combine IPR and IA into the ISA WG in Fall 2010

  10. Resolutions to be Sent to CESG and Then to CMC • None

  11. New Working Items, New BOFs, etc. • Support the creation of the ISA BoF with direction to identify a charter and to identify its work products as well as how it will integrate existing SOA and information architecture related activities.

More Related