1 / 84

Educational Research: Research Problems and the Research Plan

Educational Research: Research Problems and the Research Plan. EDU 8603 Educational Research Richard M. Jacobs, OSA, Ph.D. Research begins with a problem. The research problem …. …a question arising from personal experience or thought. …lends itself to further investigation.

diza
Download Presentation

Educational Research: Research Problems and the Research Plan

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Educational Research: Research Problems andthe Research Plan EDU 8603 Educational Research Richard M. Jacobs, OSA, Ph.D.

  2. Research begins with a problem... The research problem… …a question arising from personal experience or thought …lends itself to further investigation …transforms through the problem identification process into the research topic

  3. Sources of research problems... personal experience theory replication

  4. personal experience… …hunches …serendipity …sensitivity

  5. theory… …an organized body of concepts, constructs, generalizations, and principles that can be subjected to investigation

  6. replication… …conducting the study again to verify or disconfirm previous findings

  7. The characteristics of a good research topic... interesting …related to area of expertise and of significant personal/professional interest

  8. researchable …can be investigated through the collection and analysis of data

  9. of practical significance …contributes to the body of human knowledge and/or professional practice

  10. manageable …fits the level and skills of the researcher(s), needed resources, and time restrictions

  11. The statement of the research topic... Indicates the variables of interest to the researcher (X, Y), the specific relationship between those variables that will be investigated, and the nature of the participants involved

  12. …accompanied by a presentation of the background of the topic …provides justification for the study in terms of its significance …indicates the prediction of the results of the research findings …states the limitations of the study

  13. The review of the literature... The systematic identification, location, and analysis of documents containing information related to the research problem

  14. …identifies research already completed of significance to the research topic …points out research strategies and specific procedures that have not been found to be productive in investigating the research topic …facilitates interpretation of study results

  15. Cautions from experience... bigger does not mean better heavily researched topics provide best primary sources less-researched topics require the review of any study meaningfully related to the topic in order to formulate a logical framework for the study and a sound rationale for the research hypothesis

  16. Literature sources... primary secondary tertiary

  17. primary …a published study written by the researcher(s) who conducted the study

  18. secondary (“cited in”) …contain complete bibliographic information in the references section that can direct the researcher(s) to relevant primary sources …an excellent source indicating significant research studies that have influenced the research

  19. tertiary …reports what others have summarized about a particular research topic in a convenient format …oftentimes not a reputable source for the breadth and depth of research into a particular topic

  20. Cautions from experience... carefully evaluate sources keep careful notes of the literature reviewed build correctly formatted bibliography during the literature review process write abstract for each entry which includes key words

  21. Writing a review of the literature…  involves a technical form of writing that requires clarity in definitions and consistency in the use of terms  in the social sciences, the normative guide is the Manual of Style of the American Psychological Association

  22. The five elements of a review of the literature… 1. Outline 2.Analyze/organize references (in reverse chronological order) 3.Compare/contrast like references 4. Arrange references (“V” form) 5. Summarizes literature and identifies implications

  23. The review of the literature frames the hypothesis… • A hypothesis… …tentative prediction of the results of the research findings that states the relationship between the variables identified in the research topic

  24. Types of hypotheses… • Inductive hypothesis… …a generalization based on observed relationships …oftentimes used for qualitative research studies

  25. deductive hypothesis… …a generalization derived from theory …oftentimes used in quantitative research studies

  26. research hypothesis (H1)… …states an expected relationship between at least two variables …directional: states the expected direction of the relationship or difference …nondirectional: states that a relationship or difference exists

  27. null hypothesis (H0)… …states that there is no significant relationship or difference between two variables

  28. Stating a hypothesis… • A good hypothesis is stated clearly and concisely, expressing the relationship between two variable and variables in measurable terms

  29. involves at least three variables… P: the participants X: the treatment, causal, or independent variable Y: the observed outcome, effect, or dependent variable

  30. Stating a research hypothesis… P who get X do better on Y than P who do not get X

  31. Stating a null hypothesis… There is no difference on Y between P who get X and P who do not get X

  32. Other general considerations… • Ethical obligations • Legal restrictions • Gaining access • Conducting a pilot study

  33. Ethical obligations… • the ends do not justify the means …a primary responsibility to maintain the well-being of study participants …National Research Act of 1974 requires prior review and approval by an approved board as well as informed consent of study participants

  34. Legal restrictions… • the issues of confidentiality and personal privacy …The Privacy Act of 1974 safeguards and protects the privacy of students’ educational records (“freedom from harm”)

  35. the issue of deception …a study that requires deception should be reviewed by an advisor and/or the Human Subjects Review Committee

  36. Gaining access… • Oftentimes requires getting approval to conduct the study in the chosen site …use salesmanship to demonstrate the design’s careful study, value of study, as well as its minimal intrusiveness into and inconvenience for participants’ routine

  37. Conducting a pilot study… • a small scale field test of the research study provides a means to identify unanticipated problems or issues …allows for revisions and improvements to the research plan prior to conducting the study

  38. The research plan… • A detailed description of the procedures to be used to investigate a research topic

  39. …provides an overview of the study to be conducted and permits an assessment of the impact of any changes that may be needed as the study is undertaken …indicates the tentative prediction of the results of the research findings

  40. An overview of the five basic components of a research plan... 1. Introduction 2.Method 3.Data Analysis 4.Time Schedule 5.Budget (if appropriate)

  41. 1. The introduction section... • Provides an overview of the topic to be studied, reviews the related literature to present a rationale for conducting the study and, where appropriate, states the hypothesis in a style to facilitate the reader’s understanding

  42. Statement of the topic… …given the nature of the particular research approach adopted, describes the background of the topic and provides a rationale for the significance of the study

  43. Review of the literature… …provides an overview of the topic and references related to what is currently known (unknown) about the topic …indicates the need for further research

  44. Statement of the hypothesis… …clearly and concisely states the expected relationship (or difference) between the variables of the study, defining those variables in operational, measurable, or common-usage terms

  45. 2. The method section... • Describes the procedures used by the researcher to select participants, measure effects, and analyze the data …the approach to the conduct of the study defines the method (e.g., descriptive, causal-comparative, correlational, experimental, historical, ethnography)

  46. Research participants… …identifies the number, source, and characteristics of the sample and defines the population from which the sample will be selected

  47. Instruments… …the research that will be used in the study to measure the variables stated in the hypothesis

  48. Materials/Apparati… …identifies any special booklets, training manuals, or computer programs as well as any machines or ancillary items to be used when conducting the study

  49. Design… …the general strategy for the conduct of the study

  50. Procedure… …a description of each step that will be followed when conducting the study, from beginning to end, in the order in which each step will occur

More Related