1 / 15

Comprehensive transport evaluation (2000-2011)

Comprehensive transport evaluation (2000-2011). National Development Agency Beatrix Horváth. Evaluation Network Meeting, Brussels, 21 June, 2012.

dmurdock
Download Presentation

Comprehensive transport evaluation (2000-2011)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Comprehensive transport evaluation (2000-2011) National Development Agency Beatrix Horváth Evaluation Network Meeting, Brussels, 21 June, 2012

  2. The aim of the evaluation is to show comprehensively the contribution of EU support between 2000-2011 to the Hungarian transport development and to the overall and specific objectives laid down in transport development strategies and in the EU support programmes. According to the comprehensive approach the projects supported by EU funds have been examined in the context of the Hungarian transport development. Main objective of the evaluation: To formulate proposals for policy planning in 2014-2020, for the programming and the programme management connected to the implementation. Evaluation objective

  3. Groups of tasks: Strategiccontextanalysis Financial analysis of the 2000-2011 period Directeffectivenessassessment (4) Programme management evaluation (5) Financial and environmentalsustainabilityassessment Content of the evaluation

  4. Comprehensiveevaluation of EU supportsfortransportdevelopmentsintheperiod of 2000-2011: (Coveringprojectscontractedtill 1 July 2011): ISPA, CF (2004-2006), EIOP, ROP TOP, ROPs PHARE and cross-bordercooperationprogrammes Insomepartswith an overviewondevelopmentsfinancedfromnationalsources: National resources, EIB loan, PPP Content of the evaluation

  5. Analyzedprojects • Transport development projects in the period of 2000-2011: • 1,308 transport development projects co-financed by the EU (pre-accession funds, Cohesion and Structural Funds) • 954 projects financed from other resources (national + EIB loan + PPP) • The total cost of investments: HUF 5,024 billion. • 47.5 % (HUF 2,385 billion) of the projects was co-financed by the EU, with HUF 2,068 billion awarded (EUR 6.8 billion).

  6. Results – Public road developments

  7. Results – Railway and urban railway developments

  8. Results – Accessibility of Budapest 2005 2010 2000 2015

  9. Results – Public road accessibility

  10. Results – Public road accessibility

  11. Results – railwayaccessibility

  12. Strategic context • Recommendations for the content requirements of the strategy: • Not all types of infrastructure have to be built out everywhere, and not the most expensive and state-of-the-art infrastructure should by all means developed on every level.  development directions should be determined on the basis of social demands • Integrated developments in focus  emphasizing urban (intermodal centres, community transport) and rural development (areas left out from public road developments) aspects in transport projects • Strengthening the role of the feasibility studies, • Establishment of a transport development monitoring system.

  13. Aspects to be considered in the strategy planning • Principles of planning: need for a change in approach, to enhance the role of professional considerations in the decision making process • Definition of the goal, the function and the role of the strategy • Relation with other strategies • Needs and limiting factors • Minimum expectations and requirements • Definition of types of task for preparation and implementation • Definitions of tools for preparation and implementation • Structural conditions of the planning process • Establishment of a criteria system for project selection and prioritization (application, institutional conditions, monitoring system)

  14. Sustainability • Every fifth project serves the construction of new infrastructural element, • Exaggerated social expectations decision-makers want to fulfil, not considering its significant costs, • During the selection of projects for EU financing the short, medium and long term burdens on the budget should be considered. • Importance of the operation and the maintanence of the existing infrastructure beside developments. • The maintanance and operation should be handled not after the implementation, but during the planning, project preparation phase. • „Polluter pays principle” into the practice introduction of the eletronic distance related road toll system

  15. Thank you for your attention National Development Agency, Coordination Managing Authority, Evaluation Unit Beatrix Horváth, senior advisor beatrix.horvath@nfu.gov.hu

More Related