1 / 22

Publish paper in Computer Vision Area

Publish paper in Computer Vision Area. Conferences. CVPR – Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , since 1983 Annual , held in US ICCV – International Conference on Computer Vision, since 1987 Every other year, alternate in 3 continents

dobry
Download Presentation

Publish paper in Computer Vision Area

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Publish paper in Computer Vision Area

  2. Conferences • CVPR – Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, since 1983 • Annual, held in US • ICCV – International Conference on Computer Vision, since 1987 • Every other year, alternate in 3 continents • ECCV – European Conference on Computer Vision, since 1990 • Every other year, held in Europe

  3. Conferences (cont’d) • NIPS – Neural Information Processing Systems • MICCAI – Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention • BMVC – British Machine Vision Conference • ACCV – Asian Conference on Computer Vision • ICPR – International Conference on Pattern Recognition • ISBI – International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging • FG – IEEE Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition • ICCP, ICDR, ICVS, DAGM, CAIP, MVA, AAAI, IJCAI, ICML, ICRA, ICASSP, ICIP, SPIE, DCC, WACV, 3DPVT, ACM Multimedia, ICME, …

  4. Conference organization • General chairs: administration • Program chairs: handling papers • Area chairs: • Assign reviewers • Read reviews and rebuttals • Consolidation reports • Recommendation • Reviewers • Authors

  5. Review process • Submission • CVPR/ECCV/ICCV • Double blind review • Program chairs: assign papers to area chairs • Area chairs: assign papers to reviewers • Author Response (Rebuttal)

  6. Area chair meetings • 2 day meetings • Several panels • Each paper is reviewed by at least 2 area chairs • Buddy system • Area chair make recommendations • Program chairs make final decisions

  7. Conference acceptance rates • ICCV/CVPR/ECCV: 20% ~ 30% • ACCV (2009): ~ 30% • NIPS: 20% ~ 30% • BMVC: ~ 40% • ICIP: ~ 45% • ICPR: ~ 55% • Disclaimer • low acceptance rate = high quality?

  8. Journals • PAMI – IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, since 1979 (impact factor 2009: 5.96, #1 in all engineering and AI, top-ranked IEEE and CS journal) • IJCV – International Journal on Computer Vision, since 1988 (impact factor: 5.36, #2 in all engineering and AI)

  9. Journals (cont’d) • CVIU – Computer Vision and Image Understanding • IVC – Image and Vision Computing • IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging • TIP – IEEE Transactions on Image Processing • MVA – Machine Vision and Applications • PR – Pattern Recognition • TM – IEEE Transactions on Multimedia • …

  10. PAMI review process • Editor-in-chief (EIC) assigns papers to associate editors (AE) • AE assigns reviewers • First-round review: 3-6 months • Accept as is • Accept with minor revision (1 month revision period) • Major revision (3 months revision period) • Resubmit as new • Reject

  11. PAMI review process (cont’d) • Second-round review: 2-4 months • Accept as is • Accept with minor revision • Reject • EIC makes final decision • Overall turn-around time: 6 to 12 months • Rule of thumb: 30% additional work beyond a CVPR/ICCV/ECCV paper

  12. IJCV/other journal review process • Similar formats • IJCV has roughly the same turn-around time as PAMI • Other journals tend to have shorter turn-around time

  13. Tools • • Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic Search, • h-index • Software: publish or perish • Disclaimer: • h index = significance? • # of citation = significance

  14. How to get your papers rejected? • Refer to Jim Kajia (SIGGRAPH 93 papers chair): How to get your SIGGRAPH paper rejected? • http://www.cc.gatech.edu/student.services/phd/phd-advice/kajiya • Do not • Pay attention to review process • Put yourself as a reviewer perspective • Put the work in right context • Carry out sufficient amount of experiments • Compare with state-of-the-art algorithms • Pay attention to writing

  15. Pay attention to review process • Learn how others/you can pick apart a paper • Learn from other’s mistakes • Learn how to write good papers • Learn what it takes to get a paper published

  16. Put yourself as reviewer • What are the contributions? • Does it advance the science in the filed? • Why you should accept this paper? • Is this paper a case study? • Is this paper interesting? • What is the audience? • Does anyone care about this work?

  17. Experimental validation • Common data set • Killer data set • Large scale experiment • Evaluation metric

  18. Compare with state-of-the-art • Do your homework • Need to know what is out there • Need to show why one’s method • outperforms others, and in what way? • speed? • accuracy? • easy to implement? • general application?

  19. Writing • Clear presentation • Terse (Concise and Precise) • Careful about wording • Make claims with strong evidence • Make a good story

  20. Review form • Summary • Overall Rating • Definite accept, weakly accept, borderline, weakly reject, definite reject • Novelty • Very original, original, minor originality, has been done before • Importance/relevance • Of broad interest, interesting to a subarea, interesting only to a small number of attendees, out of CVPR scope

  21. Review form (cont’d) • Clarity of presentation • Reads very well, is clear enough, difficult to read, unreadable • Technical correctness • Definite correct, probably correct but did not check completely, contains rectifiable errors, has major problems • Experimental validation • – Excellent validation or N/A (a theoretical paper), limited but convincing, lacking in some aspects, insufficient validation • Additional comments • Reviewer’s name

  22. Good Luck !

More Related