1 / 52

Chapter 7: Representation and Manipulation of Knowledge in Memory: Images and Propositions

Chapter 7: Representation and Manipulation of Knowledge in Memory: Images and Propositions. Cognitive Psychologists Study Mental Representations. Methods Self report Rationalist approach Empirical support Experiments Neuropsychological studies. Mental Imagery.

domani
Download Presentation

Chapter 7: Representation and Manipulation of Knowledge in Memory: Images and Propositions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 7: Representation and Manipulation of Knowledge in Memory: Images and Propositions

  2. Cognitive Psychologists Study Mental Representations • Methods • Self report • Rationalist approach • Empirical support • Experiments • Neuropsychological studies

  3. Mental Imagery • Internal representation of items that are not currently being sensed • May be old, new, futuristic, imaginary • May involve any of the sensory modalities • Imagine a taste, a sight, a touch • Majority of research on Visual Imagery

  4. Mental Imagery • Kosslyn proposes images are used to help solve certain types of problems • How many chairs are there in your house? • Do bunnies have whiskers?

  5. Dual Code Theory • Paivio (1971) • We use two codes to represent information • Image codes- analogue codes, shares some perceptual features • Symbolic codes- arbitrary symbols to represent items (e.g., words) • Two codes are linked

  6. Evidence for Dual Code Theory • Paivio compared concrete words (potato, horse) with abstract words (justice, love) • Found participants were better able to recall concrete words • Concluded that dual code was created for concrete words (analog & verbal label) but not for abstract words

  7. Visual Codes are Processed Differently than Symbolic Codes • Visual information interferes with spatial information • Verbal labels interfere with spoken words • Sequence matters more for words, not so much for unrelated images • Thus, each type of code is affected by different manipulations

  8. Evidence for Dual Code Theory • Brooks (1968) • One group saw a block diagram of a letter • Memorized it • Were asked to mentally travel the letter and indicate if the corner was on the extreme top or bottom Start

  9. Evidence for Dual Code Theory • Brooks (1968) cont. • Second group saw a sentence • Memorized it • Were asked to classify each word as a noun by indicating "yes" or "no" • Verbal task A bird in the hand is not in the bush

  10. Evidence for Dual Code Theory • Brooks (1968) cont. • Participants were then asked to respond in one of two ways • Say “Yes” or “No” • Point to the answer “Yes or No” • Why was this important? Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No Yes No No Yes

  11. Evidence for Dual Code Theory • Brooks (1968) Results For image task, RT was slower when pointing. For the symbolic task, RT was slower for the verbal response. Different pattern = different processing for different codes

  12. Evidence for Dual Code Theory • te Linde (1982) • Participants answered questions about word or picture pairs

  13. te Linde (1982) Results

  14. Propositional Theory • Do not store in form of images • Instead have a “generic” code that is called “propositional” • Stores the meaning of the concept • Create a verbal or visual code by transforming the propositional code

  15. Propositional Representations

  16. Test Your Visual Imagery Ability! • Form a mental image of this picture • Which of the pictures on the next slide are part of this picture?

  17. 1 2 3 4

  18. Try Again with Another Design • Form a mental image of this picture • Which of the pictures on the next slide are part of this picture?

  19. 1 2 3 4

  20. Carmichael, Hogan, & Walters (1932) • Participants were shown simple figures with one of two verbal labels Hourglass Or Table Sun or ship’s wheel

  21. Carmichael, Hogan, & Walters (1932) Results

  22. Carmichael, Hogan, & Walters (1932) Results • Later participants were asked to draw items seen • Participants distorted the images to fit the labels • This pattern supports the idea that images may be stored propositionally not as original analog image

  23. Analogical Limitations • Inability to see parts has led some to support a propositional code rather than an analogical code • Demonstrates mental images are not always precise

  24. Finke, Pinker & Farah (1989) • Imagine a capital letter D. Rotate the figure 90 degrees to the left. Now place a capital letter J at the bottom • Imagine a capital letter N. Connect a diagonal line from the top right corner to the bottom left corner. Now rotate the figure 90 degrees to the right • Demonstrates that participants could manipulate images

  25. Mental Imagery • Shepard & Metzler (1971) • Subjects had to decide whether displays had two similar shapes • Some pairs were similar, but rotated to various degrees

  26. Shepard & Metzler (1971) Results

  27. Mental Imagery Studies Demonstrate • Active process • Response times are proportional to degree of rotation • People can rotate images in three-dimensional space as easily as two-dimensional space • Images are “Mental Sculptures”

  28. Functional-Equivalency Hypothesis • First proposed by Shepard and Kosslyn • Mental images are internal representations that operate in a way that is analogous to the functioning of the perception of physical objects

  29. Neuropsychological Evidence & Mental Imagery • Cohen & Kosslyn • Same brain areas are involved in perception and mental rotation • Support for functional-equivalence hypothesis

  30. Functional-Equivalence Evidence • Kosslyn (1975) • Examine how participants scan and use images • Some participants imagine an elephant next to a rabbit • Others imagine a rabbit next to a fly • Then answer questions about the rabbit • Does the rabbit have whiskers? • Does the rabbit have ears? • Does the rabbit have a beak? • Reaction time to answer is measured

  31. Kosslyn (1976) • Asked college students and fourth graders simple questions about animals • Does a cat have claws? • Does a cat have a head? • Varied the type of instructions used to answer questions • Imagery instructions • No imagery

  32. Kosslyn (1976) Results • In imagery condition, questions were answered faster if the attribute was larger • In no imagery condition, questions were answered faster based on distinctiveness of characteristic for the animal, no impact of size

  33. Size Judgments (Moyer, 1973) • Which is larger, moose or roach? • Which is larger, wolf or lion? • When objects are similar in size, participants imagine both objects and then compare the size of the objects in their image • Similar results when making comparisons of actual physical objects • The closer in size, the longer the reaction time

  34. Functional-Equivalence Evidence • Kosslyn (1983) • Memorize map • Later ask to scan image • Manipulate distance between items in scan • Hut to grasses • Lake to Hut • Measure reaction time

  35. Kosslyn (1983) Results • Linear relationship between the distance to scan and actual reaction time of participants • Further support for functional-equivalence hypothesis • Mental images are internal representations that operate in a way that is analogous to the functioning of the perception of physical objects

  36. Finke (1989) on Functional Equivalence • We use similar transformation on objects and mental images • Spatial arrangements of a mental image are similar to spatial arrangements of actual object • Images can be used to generate information not explicitly stored during encoding • Processes of visual system are used on both mental images and visual objects

  37. Demand Characteristics • Major criticisms of Kosslyn’s Research • Pylyshyn • There is only one code, propositional • The results due to task demands • The instructions imply some necessary relationship between the physical distance and time required

  38. Demand Characteristics & Mental Scanning • Participants give the experimenters the pattern they expect • Intons-Peterson replicated research but mislead experimenters • If experimenter expectations are part of demand characteristics, then leading them to believe that longer distances would lead to faster responding should alter the results • Evidence was found to support demand characteristics idea

  39. Demand Characteristics & Mental Scanning • Jolicoeur & Kosslyn (1985) • Created a false demand characteristic for a U shaped function for participants • Proposed that Gestalt principle of proximity makes close points “hard”, and distant points would also take longer • No experimental expectancy effect found • Supports idea that image is being used

  40. Johnson-Laird (1983) • Proposed there are three types of mental representations • Propositional representations which are pieces of information resembling natural language • Mental models which are structural analogies of the world • Mental imagery which are perceptual models from a particular point of view

  41. Characteristics of a Mental Model • A representation of a described situation rather than a representation of a text itself or the propositions conveyed by a text • The structure corresponds to the functional relations among entities as they would exist in the world • A simulation of events in the world, either real or imaginary

  42. Evidence for Mental Models • Kerr (1983) • Studied participants who were blind • Created a tactile Kosslyn Map study equivalent • Participants had to study the island, given a physical map to touch • Asked the same scanning questions • Found the same pattern of results—longer distances, longer reaction times

  43. Visual Imagery & Spatial Imagery • Visual Imagery (images are visual) • Seeing colors • Comparing shapes • Spatial Imagery (analog spatial format) • Rotating objects • Aiming and shooting at a target

  44. Neuroscience Evidence • Farah (1988) • Brain Injury Case Study (L.H.) • Gave some visual tasks • Color identification, object naming • Gave some imagery tasks • Mental rotation, mental scanning

  45. Farah (1988) Results • L.H. • Poor visual image skill • Normal spatial image skill • Thus, both types of imagery must exist

  46. In Sum, Researchers Have Proposed • Evidence for analog codes • Evidence for propositional codes • Evidence for mental models • Evidence for a mental imagery that is spatial • Evidence for mental imagery that is visual

  47. Cognitive Maps: Historically • Tolman – Rats • von Frisch – Bees • Thorndyke – Humans

  48. Creating Cognitive Maps • Gain increased spatial knowledge • Using three types of knowledge • Landmark (special buildings) • Route-road (procedures to get to one place from another) • Survey (global map-like view)

  49. Tversky (1993) • Cognitive maps more like cognitive collages • Constructionist view of creating cognitive maps • Distortions can occur when using heuristics

  50. Heuristics Affecting Cognitive Maps • Rotation heuristic • Tend to ‘regularize’ tilted landmarks in maps to appropriate E-W or N-S axis • Alignment heuristic • Students view two maps of the Americas • One a correct map, and a second map which was altered (South America was moved westward with respect to North America) • A majority of students thought the altered map was the correct one

More Related