E N D
1. Miscellaneous Detectors November 11, 2003
Prof. Tsi-chian Chao
2. Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLD) One measurement
A set of measurementsOne measurement
A set of measurements
3. Glow Curve
4. Readout Cycle
Pre-heat period
Without light integration to discriminate against unstable low-temperature traps
Read period
Spanning the emission of the part of the glow curve to be read as a measure of the dose
Annealing period
During which the remainder of the stored energy is dumped without light integration
Cool-down period
After the heater-pan power is turned off
5. Trap Stability Annealing
Apply after TLD signals have been “read”
To avoid trap configuration change
TL phosphors give best performance as dosimeters if they receive uniform, reproducible, and optimal heat treatment before and after use
Ex. LiF (TLD-100)
400 0C for 1 h, quick cooling, then 80 0C for 24 h
6. Advantages Wide useful dose range
From a few mrad to ?103 rad linearly
Dose-rate independence
0-1011 rad/s
Small size
Chips, rods, powder
Commercial availability
Reusability
Can be reused many times
7. Advantages Economy
Reusability reduces cost
Availability of different types with different sensitivities to thermal neutrons
TLD-700 (7LiF)
Sensitive to photons only
TLD-100 (93% 7LiF + 7% 6LiF)
Sensitive to both neutrons and photons
TLD-600 (96% 6LiF)
Sensitive to neutrons only
8. Advantages Readout convenience
Readout rapidly (<30 s)
Automation compatibility
Automatic reader for mass amount of TLDs
Accuracy and precision
Reproducibility of 1-2 %
1-2 % accuracy through individual calibration and averaging of several dosimeters in a cluster
9. Disadvantages Lack of uniformity
Sensitivity varies from batch to batch, even from dosimeter to dosimeter of the same batch
Storage instability
Sensitivity varies with time
Fading
Gradual loss of the latent TLD signal
10. Disadvantages Light sensitivity
Sensitive to light—especially to UV, sunlight, or fluorescent light
Spurious TL
Scraping, chipping, or surface contamination by dirt or humidity can cause spurious TL readings
Loss of a reading
No second chance at getting a reading
11. Disadvantages
Memory of radiation and thermal history
Sensitivity increased or decreased after receiving a large dose of radiation
Reader instability
Reader constancy is difficult to maintain over long time periods
12. Photographic Dosimetry Exposure
Radiation hits photographic emulsion and generate ion pairs near AgBr grains then converting Ag+ ions to Ag atoms
Chemical processing
Developing
in the chemical process all of the Ag+ converted to Ag atoms, leaving behind an opaque microscopic grain of silver
Stop bath
Hypo
13. Optical Density of Film
14. Energy Dependence Increased response for energy < 200 keV due to photoelectric effect
Use of filter to eliminate this over response
15. Advantages Spatial resolution
Unrivaled in spatial resolution
Reading Permanence
The record is permanent
Commercial availability
Geometry
Thin and flat shape allow simple use
Can approach B-G cavity dimensions
Linearity vs. dose
Dose-rate independence
16. Disadvantages Wet chemical processing
Require careful control of wet-chemical development process
Energy dependence of X rays
Over-response for energy below 300 keV due to photoelectric interactions with silver bromide grains
sensitivity to hostile environments
Double-valued response functions
Over-saturate of film response cause double-valued response
Blindness to low-energy neutrons
17. Chemical Dosimetry Chemical Dosimetry
Basic Principles
Radiation interacts with water
produce chemically active primary products (free radicals, such as H2 & H2O2) in about 10-10 s or less
initially distributed heterogeneously, close to the charged-particle tracks
by 10-6 s, diffuse to become more homogeneous, simultaneous with their chemical interactions with the solutes present
18. Chemical Dosimetry Radiation chemical yield (G-value)
Defined as the number of chemical entities produced, destroyed, or changed by the expenditure of 100 eV of radiation energy
in moles/J
Calculation of absorbed dose
?M (mole/liter)
the change in molar concentration of product X due to the irradiation
? (g/cm3 or kg/liter): solution density
19. Chemical Dosimetry Popular example
Fricke Ferrous Sulfate Dosimeter
Fe2+ ? Fe3+ oxidation reaction
Composition
0.001 M FeSO4 or Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2 and 0.8 N H2SO4
20. Chemical Dosimetry Advantages
Z, ?en/? & ? similar to water
Liquid dosimeters can be made similar in shape and volume to the studied object
Absolute dosimetry possible
Different chemical dosimeters can be used to cover various dose ranges: 10-1010 rad
Linear dose response vs. dose in useful ranges
21. Chemical Dosimetry Disadvantages
Lack of storage stability prevents commercial availability, requiring wet chemistry in the user’s lab
Useful dose ranges too high for personnel monitoring or small source measurements
Some degree of dose-rate and LET dependence
Dependence on the temperature of the solution during irradiation and during the readout procedure
22. Calorimetric Dosimetry Calorimetric Dosimetry
Direct measurement of the full energy imparted to matter by radiation
Closest of any method for absolute dose measurement
?T: temperature change
h: thermal capacity (cal/g 0C or J/kg 0C)
?: thermal defect
The fraction of E that dose not appear as hear, due to competing chemical reactions
23. Calorimetric Dosimetry Advantages
Absolute dosimetry
Closest of any method being a direct measurement of the energy involved in the absorbed dose
Almost any material can be employed in the sensitive volume
Dose-rate independent
No LET dependence
Relatively stable against radiation damage
24. Calorimetric Dosimetry Disadvantages
Temperature rise small, limiting measurement to relatively large doses
Apparatus bulky, difficult to transport and set up
For low dose rates, thermal leakage limits the accuracy and precision achievable
Thermal defect problem