1 / 20

NDIIPP: Future Directions and Relevance to Other Countries

NDIIPP: Future Directions and Relevance to Other Countries. Beth Dulabahn Office of Strategic Initiatives Library of Congress November 7, 2004. NDIIPP Legislation and Funding. Created by federal legislation (PL 106-554) in December 2000 $100 million in appropriated funds

donaldsons
Download Presentation

NDIIPP: Future Directions and Relevance to Other Countries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NDIIPP: Future Directions and Relevance to Other Countries Beth Dulabahn Office of Strategic Initiatives Library of Congress November 7, 2004

  2. NDIIPP Legislation and Funding • Created by federal legislation (PL 106-554) in December 2000 • $100 million in appropriated funds • Up to $175 million potentially invested • $75 million of the appropriated funds subject to $ for $ match from non-federal sources

  3. NDIIPP Goals • Develop a national digital collection and preservation strategy • Work with government agencies, libraries, archives, and other stakeholders to establish partnerships and form networks • Help identify and preserve at-risk digital content • Support development of tools, models, and methods for digital preservation

  4. Who’s Included? • Key federal agencies (including NARA, NLM, NAL, Commerce) • Libraries, archives, and other cultural institutions • Non-profit entities (e.g., RLG, OCLC, CLIR) • Non-federal and commercial sectors (e.g., motion picture studios, record labels, publishers)

  5. Initial Activities • Established the NDSAB in Spring 2001 • Representation from federal agencies, industry, research libraries and foundations • Convened Stakeholder Meetings in Fall 2001 • 3 workshops including representatives from the commercial sector • Commissioned environmental scans • Conducted Scenario Planning sessions • Defined preservation architecture space • Facilitated a National Science Foundation research agenda • Developed Plan & presented to Congress 2003

  6. NDIIPP Strategy • Iterative approach • Learn by doing

  7. NDIIPP Focus Areas • Preservation architecture • Digital preservation research • Network of preservation partners

  8. Preservation Architecture • Architecture is a conceptual framework to guide development of national preservation network • Build upon current work • Provide basis for communication about the problem space

  9. Archive Ingest and Handling Test • Document steps taken to ingest heterogeneous set of digital content • Testers have digital preservation capabilities: Johns Hopkins, Old Dominion, Harvard, Stanford • Each to work with GMU 9/11 Archive • 12gb with 57,000 objects associated metadata • Diverse file formats • Identify metrics for ensuring preservation of data integrity/document logical integrity

  10. Archive Test Activities • Accept archive as-is • Generate metadata • Ingest content into the archive • Migrate/emulate content as applicable to each archive • Export content/metadata out of the archive

  11. Archive Test Outcomes • List of logical candidate architectures for future work • Understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each • Rough dollar cost figures for each solution • Grasp of the possibilities and challenges of federating

  12. Research Program • Joint LC/National Science Foundation (NSF) digital preservation research grants program • NSF administers • Agenda shaped by It’s About Time report • Looking to fund cutting edge research to address major needs • Proposals due 9/14/2004; peer review panels evaluating submissions • Grants to be announced early 2005

  13. NDIIPP Partnerships • Agreements finalized Sept. 2004 • Eight consortia involving over 30 partners • State government entities • Universities • Cultural heritage institutions • Private & not-for-profit • Awards totaling $15+ million • Projects expected to last 3 years • Aim is to spur collaboration in selecting and preserving at-risk content

  14. Diversity of Content • Funded projects will work with diverse and challenging content, including • TV broadcasts and digital video • Web sites • State and local government information • Geospatial data • Social science data

  15. NDIIPP Partner Projects with Web Harvesting Components • The Web at Risk: A Distributed Approach to Preserving Our Nation’s Political Cultural Heritage • California Digital Library, lead • University of North Texas, New York University • State & local gov’t publications, political campaigns, labor history, former federal agency sites • Develop tools for selection and acquisition

  16. NDIIPP Partner Projects with Web Harvesting Components (Cont.) • Exploring Collaborations to Harness Objects with a Digital Environment for Preservation • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, lead • OCLC; Tufts University; Michigan State, Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, North Carolina, and Wisconsin State libraries • Collect Web-based state gov’t agency publications • Develop tools for selection, acquisition, and access • Test existing repository architectures (Dspace, Greenstone, FEDORA, Eprints)

  17. The Next NDIIPP Area of Investment… • State and Local Governments • Currently in planning phase • Plan to award $$ to states through IMLS

  18. Achievements at End of 5 Years • A network of 50-75 partners • Vast archive of at-risk content • Recommendations to Congress on long-term governance of a national digital preservation

More Related