1 / 25

LUSI Diagnostics & Common Optics WBS 1.5

LUSI Diagnostics & Common Optics WBS 1.5. Yiping Feng – DCO Lead Scientist LUSI CD-2 Review August 19, 2008. Lead Engineer: Eliazar Ortiz Mechanical Engineer: Marc Campell Mechanical Engineer: Nadine Kurita Design Engineer: Rick Jackson Designer: Don Arnett Designer: Ben Bigornia.

draco
Download Presentation

LUSI Diagnostics & Common Optics WBS 1.5

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LUSI Diagnostics & Common Optics WBS 1.5 Yiping Feng – DCO Lead Scientist LUSI CD-2 Review August 19, 2008 Lead Engineer: Eliazar Ortiz Mechanical Engineer: Marc Campell Mechanical Engineer: Nadine Kurita Design Engineer: Rick Jackson Designer: Don Arnett Designer: Ben Bigornia

  2. Outline • Diagnostics & common optics (DCO) overview • DCO scope • Components locations • Components physics requirements • Components descriptions • Deliverables • Schedule • Costs • Major risks • 6-month look-ahead • Summary

  3. Overview • Common needs recognized for all LUSI instruments in • Diagnostics for measuring X-ray FEL properties • Transverse beam profile • Incident beam intensity • Transverse beam positions • Wave field at focus • Optical components for performing X-ray FEL manipulations • Beam size definition and clean-up • Attenuation • Pulse pattern selection and/or repetition rate reduction • Isolation of fundamental from high harmonics • Focusing • Monochromatization

  4. Overview (cont.) • Common components identified among all LUSI instruments & categorized, based on functionalities, into • diagnostics suite • common optics suite • To facilitate common design & implementation • A single WBS element created – WBS 1.5 • Captured all XPP, CXI, and XCS common components • The DCO integrated team put in place • DCO scientific/technical team • DCO engineering team

  5. DCO Science Team • Responsible for developing specifications and device/component concepts for DCO DCO scientific/technical team • Yiping Feng, DCO lead scientist • Instrument liaisons & DCO scientists • David Fritz, XPP instr., attenuator, harmonic rejection mirrors • Marc Messerschmidt, XPP instr. • Sébastien Boutet, CXI instr., slits system, pulse picker • Aymeric Robert, XCS instr., focusing lens, offset monochromator • Niels van Bakel, X-ray detectors support • Gunther Haller/Dieter Freytag, EE support

  6. Overview (cont.) • Physics requirement documents released by DCO team • Diagnostics • sp39100004-1_XRPopInProfMon-PRD • sp39100009-1_XRPopInIntensity-PRD • sp39100008-1_XRIntensity-Position-PRD • sp39100007-0_XRWavefrontMon-PRD* • Common optics • sp39100011-1_BeLens-PRD • sp39100014-1_Slits-PRD • sp39100010-1_Atten-PRD • sp39100023-1_Pulse_Picker-PRD • sp39100034-1_HarmRejMirror-PRD • sp39100016-0_OffsetMono (in work)* * In initial version-0

  7. DCO Scope • Work Breakdown Structure

  8. Components Locations • Components locations • Distributed throughout the XPP, CXI, and XCS instruments, including X-ray transport tunnel HEDS CXI Endstation X-ray Transport Tunnel XCS Endstation Near Experimental Hall XPP Endstation Far Experimental Hall LCLS X-ray FEL SXR AMO

  9. Components Locations (cont.) • An example in XPP • 15 diagnostics/common optics components embedded in XPP

  10. Device/Component Counts • Total device/component counts

  11. DCO Physics Requirements • Goals • Build diagnostics and common optics to help XPP, CXI, and XCS instruments achieve their full scientific potentials • Common requirements stemmed from characteristics of LCLS X-ray FEL • Ultra short @ 100 fs, and repetition rate of 120 Hz • High peak power ~ 10 GW • Fully coherent in transverse directions ~ TEM00 • Intrinsic intensity, temporal, spatial, timing fluctuations on per-pulse basis, i.e.,

  12. DCO Physics Requirements (cont.) • Unique challenges identified for LUSI DCO • Capable of sustaining the instantaneous LCLS X-ray FEL peak power • Exercising deliberate material selection • Thermal calculations including melting threshold and onset of thermal fatigue • Capable of coherent beam manipulation • Minimizing large angle diffractions to the extent possible • i.e., utilizing cylindrical blades for slits • Minimizing random wavefront distortion to the extent possible • Reducing surface roughness and bulk non-uniformities • Capable of ultra-fast signal detection • Extracting signals in ~ ns to avoid large background • i.e., charge-sensitive detection in intensity measurements • Capable of per-pulse measurement if required • Each pulse is a new experiment • Averaging NOT an option, requiring high S/N ratio from single pulse • i.e., high-precision intensity measurements to 0.1% based on single pulse

  13. Linac-to-Undulator (227m) Undulator Hall (175m) Near Expt. Hall X-ray Transport (230m) Far Expt. Hall 60 mm 1.1 mrad 220 mm 490 mm Mono location 200 m Rayleigh Length 54 m XPP - 193 m XCS - 419 m Source to Sample distance @ 1.5 Å CXI - 440 m DCO Physics Requirements (cont.) • Unique challenges for LUSI DCO (cont.) • Capable of maintaining ultra-high mechanical stability in case of large optics-to-sample distance, i.e., XCS offset monochromator • To 10% of beam size at 50 mm  0.25 mrad pointing stability

  14. Diagnostics suite Pop-in profile monitor (WBS 1.5.2.1) Requirements Destructive; Retractable; Variable FOV and resolution At 100 mm resolution, 24x24 mm2 FOV; At 8 mm resolution, 2x2 mm2 FOV; Capable of per-pulse op. @ 120 Hz if required Attenuation used if necessary Pop-in intensity monitor (WBS 1.5.2.2) Requirements Destructive; Retractable; Relative accuracy < 1%; Working dynamic range 100; Sensitive area 20x20 mm2 Capable of per-pulse op. @ 120 Hz Attenuation used if necessary Component Descriptions

  15. Diagnostics suite (cont.) Intensity-position monitor (WBS 1.5.2.3) Requirements In-situ, but retractable if desired Highly transmissive (< 5% loss); Relative accuracy < 0.1%; Working dynamic range 1000; Position accuracy in xy < 10 mm; Per-pulse op. at 120 Hz; Wavefront monitor (WBS 1.5.2.1) Requirements In-situ, but retractable if desired Variable FOV and resolution Per-pulse op. @ 120 Hz Attenuation used if necessary Computational algorithms needed for wavefront reconstruction Component Descriptions (cont.)

  16. Common optics suite X-ray focusing lenses (WBS 1.5.3.2) Requirements Produce variable focused spot size For XPP 2-10 mm in focus 40-60 mm out-of-focus Minimize wavefront distortion Withstand FEL full flux Slits system (WBS 1.5.3.3) Requirements 0 – 10 mm gap setting 10-9 in trans. btw 2-8.265 keV 10-8 in trans. at 25 keV Gap precisions in xy 0.5 mm for precise slits 5 mm for coarse slits Minimize diffraction/wavefront distortion Withstand FEL full flux Component Descriptions (cont.)

  17. Pulse picker (WBS 1.5.3.5) Requirements < 3 ms switching time Reduce rep rate < 10 Hz operation* Not preferred for > 10 Hz continuous operation, FEL rep rate reduction will be used Withstand full LCLS FEL flux Requiring 100 mm Si3N4 to protect the steel blade Common X-ray optics (cont.) Attenuators (WBS 1.5.3.4) Requirements Minimize wavefront distortion Withstand full FEL flux 108 attenuation at 8.3 keV* 104 attenuation at 24.9 keV At least 3 steps per decade Component Descriptions (cont.) *DCO key performance parameters

  18. Offset monochromator (WBS 1.5.3.1) Requirements Large 600 mm offset 6-25 keV energy range Continuously tunable 10% positional stability (of beam size) Double-crystal geometry Attenuation used if necessary Common optics (cont.) Harmonic rejection mirrors (WBS 1.5.3.6) Requirements Energy range btw 6 - 8.265 keV 104 contrast ratio between fundamental and the 3rd harmonic, 106 overall 80% overall throughput for the fundamental Minimize wavefront distortion Withstand full FEL flux Component Descriptions (cont.)

  19. DCO Deliverables • Phased deliverables

  20. DCO Schedule • WBS 1.5 schedule developed to ensure that instruments’ milestones are met on time • Preliminary design reviews • Pop-In Profile Monitor Q4 FY08 • Pop-In Intensity Monitor Q4 FY08 • Pulse Picker Q4 FY08 • Slits System Q1 FY09 • Intensity-Position Monitor Q1 FY09 • X-ray Focusing Lens Q2 FY09 • Attenuators Q3 FY09 • Harmonic Rejection Mirrors Q4 FY09 • Wavefront Monitor Q1 FY10 • Offset Monochromator Q2 FY10 • Final design reviews • Pulse Picker Q1 FY09 • Slits System Q1 FY09 • Intensity-Position Monitor Q2 FY09 • Pop-In Profile Monitor Q2 FY09 • Pop-In Intensity Monitor Q3 FY09 • X-ray Focusing Lens Q3 FY09 • Attenuators Q4 FY09 • Harmonic Rejection Mirrors Q1 FY10 • Wavefront Monitor Q2 FY10 • Installation complete • CD-4A Installation complete Q1 FY11 • CD-4B Installation complete Q3 FY11 • CD-4C Installation complete Q3 FY12

  21. DCO Cost Baseline • Labor & non-labor (M&S, etc.)

  22. DCO Cost Baseline (cont.) • Level-3/4 cost breakdown • 1.5.02 - Diagnostics • 1.5.03 – Common optics

  23. DCO Major Risks • Offset monochromator • Mechanical stability not met • Required to maintain position stability to 10% of beam size • Mitigation • Ensure requirements are clearly stated and agreed prior to award and fabrication • Implement a stringent vendor selection process • Implement regular visits to vendor • Implement frequent and measurable status reports • Maintain constant communication with the vendor prior to and during design and fabrication Linac-to-Undulator (227m) Undulator Hall (175m) Near Expt. Hall X-ray Transport (230m) Far Expt. Hall 60 mm 1.1 mrad 220 mm 490 mm Mono location 200 m Rayleigh Length 54 m XPP - 193 m XCS - 419 m Source to Sample distance @ 1.5 Å CXI - 440 m

  24. 6-Month Look-ahead • Major milestones • Preliminary design reviews • Q4FY08 – PDR Pop-in profile monitor • Q4FY08 – PDR Pop-in intensity monitor • Q4FY08 – PDR Pulse picker • Q1FY09 – PDR Intensity-position monitor • Q1FY09 – PDR Slits system • Final design reviews • Q1FY09 – FDR Slits system • Q1FY09 – FDR Pulse picker

  25. Summary • Diagnostics and common optics help support LUSI instruments to fulfill CD-0 mission in a wide variety of cutting edge research capabilities • Diagnostic & optical components concepts are based on proven developments made at SPPS, FLASH, and SR sources • Safety hazards have been identified in Hazard Analysis Report (HAR) • Safety issues are considered at every step of design and fabrication process • Scope of DCO components for XPP, CXI, and XCS instruments fully defined • Resource loaded schedule developed through end of project • Preliminary designs of key components are well advanced • DCO and LUSI are ready for CD-2 approval

More Related