1 / 26

Sampling Frequency and Jump Detection Mike Schwert ECON201FS 4/7/08

Sampling Frequency and Jump Detection Mike Schwert ECON201FS 4/7/08. This Week’s Approach and Data Counted common jump days between different sampling frequencies for Ait-Sahalia Jacod, Lee-Mykland and Jiang-Oomen jump tests Counted common jump days between different tests

drea
Download Presentation

Sampling Frequency and Jump Detection Mike Schwert ECON201FS 4/7/08

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sampling Frequency and Jump Detection Mike Schwert ECON201FS 4/7/08

  2. This Week’s Approach and Data • Counted common jump days between different sampling frequencies for Ait-Sahalia Jacod, Lee-Mykland and Jiang-Oomen jump tests • Counted common jump days between different tests • Summarized effect of sampling frequency on jump detection • Price Data: • GE minute-by-minute 1997 – 2007 (2670 days) • ExxonMobil minute-by-minute 1999 – 2008 (2026 days) • AT&T minute-by-minute 1997 – 2008 (2680 days) • S&P 500 every 5 minutes, 1985 – 2007 (5545 days, excluding short days) • Simulated Data: • Continuous process plus jumps from a tempered stable distribution • Alphas of 0.30, 0.90, 1.50, 1.90 • 78 daily price observations for 2500 days (195000 total observations)

  3. Simulated Data – α = 0.30

  4. Simulated Data – α = 0.90

  5. Simulated Data – α = 1.50

  6. Simulated Data – α = 1.90

  7. Contingency Tables – BN-S ZQP-max Statistic α = 0.30 α = 0.90 α = 1.50 α = 1.90

  8. Contingency Tables – BN-S ZTP-max Statistic α = 0.30 α = 0.90 α = 1.50 α = 1.90

  9. Ait-Sahalia Jacod Test • Introduced in 2008 article by Yacine Ait-Sahalia and Jean Jacod

  10. Contingency Tables – Ait-Sahalia Jacod Test GE S&P 500 Exxon Mobil AT&T

  11. Contingency Tables – Ait-Sahalia Jacod Test α = 0.30 α = 0.90 α = 1.50 α = 1.90

  12. Lee-Mykland Test • Introduced by Suzanne Lee and Per Mykland in a 2007 paper • Allows identification of jump timing, multiple jumps in a day

  13. Daily Contingency Tables – Lee-Mykland Test GE S&P 500 Exxon Mobil AT&T

  14. Daily Contingency Tables – Lee-Mykland Test α = 0.30 α = 0.90 α = 1.50 α = 1.90

  15. Microstructure Noise Robust Jiang-Oomen Test • Similar to Jiang-Oomen Swap Variance test, but robust to microstructure noise which often contaminates high-frequency data • NOTE: NO SIMULATED RESULTS YET BECAUSE OF DIFFICULTIES WITH SEXTICITY CALCULATION

  16. Microstructure Noise Robust Jiang-Oomen Test Difference Test: Logarithmic Test: Ratio Test:

  17. Contingency Tables – MNR-JO Difference Test GE S&P 500 Exxon Mobil AT&T

  18. Contingency Tables – MNR-JO Log Test GE S&P 500 Exxon Mobil AT&T

  19. Contingency Tables – MNR-JO Ratio Test GE S&P 500 Exxon Mobil AT&T

  20. Cross-Test Contingency Tables • Checked to see if different jump tests find jumps on same days • Tests: • Barndorff-Nielsen Shephard ZQP-max test • Jiang-Oomen swap variance test • Microstructure Noise Robust Jiang-Oomen test • Ait-Sahalia Jacod test • Lee-Mykland test

  21. Cross-Test Contingency Tables – 5 min sample GE S&P 500 XOM α = 1.50

  22. Cross-Test Contingency Tables – 10 min sample GE S&P 500 XOM α = 1.50

  23. Cross-Test Contingency Tables – 15 min sample GE S&P 500 XOM α = 1.50

  24. Cross-Test Contingency Tables – 20 min sample GE S&P 500 XOM α = 1.50

  25. Summary of Tests’ Sample Robustness • Denominator is frequency with lower number of jumps • Lee-Mykland test results based on daily findings – detected jumps are not necessarily at the same time during the day

  26. Possible Extensions • Regress Barndorff-Shephard Nielsen ZQP-max statistics on changes in daily volume to see if high volume days correspond to jump days and common jump days between samples • Examine jump diffusion models other than the Poisson process used in most jump detection literature

More Related