1 / 21

Greg Harper Population Division September 28, 2006 Presented to FSCPE Fall Meeting

Reviewing Subcounty Population Estimates. Greg Harper Population Division September 28, 2006 Presented to FSCPE Fall Meeting. Overview. Subcounty population estimates methodology Review of housing unit data Review of subcounty population estimates.

druce
Download Presentation

Greg Harper Population Division September 28, 2006 Presented to FSCPE Fall Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Reviewing Subcounty Population Estimates • Greg Harper • Population Division • September 28, 2006 • Presented to FSCPE Fall Meeting

  2. Overview • Subcounty population estimates methodology • Review of housing unit data • Review of subcounty population estimates

  3. Subcounty Population Estimates Methodology Distributive Housing Unit Method • Change in housing units since the last Census at the subcounty level is used to distribute the estimated county population • Components of Housing Unit Change • Residential Construction • Mobile Home Placements • Housing Unit Loss

  4. Housing Unit Estimates Equation • HU06 = HU00 + (NC06 + NM06) –HL06 • HU06 = Estimated 2006 Housing Units • HU00 = 2000 Housing Unit Estimates Base • NC06 = Estimated New Residential Construction: 2000 - 2006 • NM06 = Estimated New Residential Mobile Homes: 2000 - 2006 • HL06 = Estimated Residential Housing Loss: 2000 - 2006

  5. Estimated Residential Construction • Building Permits • Compiled by the Census Bureau’s manufacturing and Construction Division (MCD) • Nonpermitted Construction • Estimated from annual Survey of Construction

  6. Mobile Home Placements • State mobile shipments data distributed to subcounty areas based on the subcounty area’s share of mobile homes in Census 2000 • Sample data retabulated for consistency with 100 percent housing unit data

  7. Housing Unit Loss • Data derived from 1997–2003 AHS National Sample • Type of Non-interview Considered a Loss • Type B, 16 - Interior exposed to the elements • Type C, 30 – Demolished or disaster loss • Type C, 31 – House or mobile home moved • Categories for Developing Loss Rates • Mobile Homes • Age of Structure (seven categories)

  8. Summary of Loss Rates • 0.295% Total Annual Loss Rate • Mobile Homes: 1.580% • Houses or Apartments • 1990-2000: 0.058% • 1980-1990: 0.092% • 1970-1980: 0.100% • 1960-1970: 0.178% • 1950-1960: 0.224% • 1940-1950: 0.359% • Pre-1940: 0.395%

  9. Uncontrolled Subcounty Population Estimate • UHHP06 = HU06 * OCC00 * PPH00 • UHHP06 = Uncontrolled 2002 subcounty household population estimate • HU06 = 2006 Housing Unit Estimate • OCC00 = Census 2000 occupancy rate • PPH00 = Census 2000 population per household

  10. Final Subcounty Population Estimate • SCPOP06 = [UHHP06 * (ARCHHP06/HUMHHP06)] + GQ06 • SCPOP06 = Final 2006 subcounty population estimate • UHHP06 = Uncontrolled 2006 household population estimate • ARCHHP06 = 2006 Administrative Records method county household population estimate • HUMHHP06 = 2006 Housing Unit method county household population6 estimate • ARCHHP06/HUMHHP06 = Rake Factor • GQ06 = 2006 group quarters population estimate

  11. The Housing Unit Review File • File contains components of housing unit change • Available in late October • Two months of review • Can be made available to local governments • Data for areas affected by Katrina

  12. Housing Unit Review File Components • PER7_2005 = building permits issued in calendar year 2004 * .98 • Assumes six-month lag time between permit issuance and completed construction • Assumes 2 percent of permits do not result in completed construction

  13. Housing Unit Review File Components • MOB7_2005 = New mobile homes allocated to place from July 1, 2004 to July 1, 2005 • NPHB7_2005 = Nonpermitted residential construction allocated to place from July 1, 2004 to July 1, 2005 • If permits are issued for locality, NPHB will be 0

  14. Housing Unit Review File Components • NPHD7_2005 = Estimated housing unit loss from July 1, 2004 to July 1, 2005 • The same loss rate is applied to updated estimates of housing units so the amount of loss will not change much from year to year • HSG7_2005 = 2005 estimate of housing units • HSG7_2005 = HSG7_2004 + PER7_2005 + MOB7_2005 + NPHB7_2005 – NPHD7_2005

  15. Housing Unit Review • Use Excel spreadsheet in same format • Keep housing units consistent with components • Route local comments through FSCPE agency • Provide comments in lowest level of geography • Summary level 157 in non-MCD states, 071 in MCD states

  16. The Subcounty Population Estimates Review File • File will be made available In February • Three to four weeks for review • File can not be shared with local governments

  17. Subcounty Population Estimates Review File • VACR_2000 = Census 2000 Vacancy Rate • PPH_2000 = Census 2000 Population per Household • HU_2005 = 2005 Housing Unit Estimate • GQ_2005 = 2005 Group Quarters Population Estimate

  18. Subcounty Population Estimates Review File • HHPOP_2005 = 2005 subcounty population estimate • HHPOP_2005 = HU_2005 * PPH_2000* ((100 – VACR_2000)/100) * RAKE_2005 • POPCEN_2000 = Census 2000 total population • PBASE_2000 = 2000 Estimates base population • Census 2000 population updated with County Question Resolution Actions, boundary changes, and administrative geographic revisions.

  19. Subcounty Population Estimates Review File • POP_2005 = HHPOP_2005 + GQ_2005 • RAKE_2005 = County population estimate/ county sum of uncontrolled subcounty housing unit population estimates • A rake factor less than 1 indicates faster housing unit growth than population growth

  20. Subcounty Population Estimates Review • Comments should be as specific as possible • Most changes should have already been made to the housing unit file • If housing units are OK and the county estimate is OK then problems should be limited to GQ or calculations

  21. Questions ?

More Related