1 / 58

Higher and Int. 2 Close Reading

Higher and Int. 2 Close Reading. Question types and strategies. Frequency of question types. UNDERSTANDING QUESTIONS. This type of question is designed to check you understand the meaning, language and ideas of the passage. Understanding questions are marked with a (U) code. Instructions.

dworrall
Download Presentation

Higher and Int. 2 Close Reading

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Higher and Int. 2 Close Reading Question types and strategies

  2. Frequency of question types

  3. UNDERSTANDING QUESTIONS • This type of question is designed to check you understand the meaning, language and ideas of the passage. • Understanding questions are marked with a (U) code.

  4. Instructions • When answering questions coded “U—Understanding”, use your own words as far as is reasonably possible and do not simply repeat the wording of the passage.

  5. Types of understanding questions • Own words • Quote • Context • Link • Summarise

  6. Reminder • You are reminded of the instruction on the front cover: • When answering questions coded “U—Understanding”, use your own words as far as is reasonably possible and do not simply repeat the wording of the passage.

  7. Understanding Questions

  8. Own Words (U) • Find the correct lines. • Check number of marks. • Re-write in your own words. • Check you haven’t copied key words from the passage.

  9. Points available for own words questions

  10. 10 (a) In your own words ... explain what, according to the writer, the potential disadvantage of the online library is. 1U(2007) • But now a revolution, widely compared to the invention of printing itself, is taking place among the book shelves, and the library will never be the same again. This week Google announced plans to digitise fifteen million books from five great libraries, including the Bodleian. • Some fear that this total library, vast and invisible, could finally destroy traditional libraries, which will become mere warehouses for the physical objects, empty of people and life. However, the advantages of a single scholarly online catalogue are incalculable and rather than destroying libraries, the internet will protect the written word as never before, and render knowledge genuinely democratic. Fanatics always attack the libraries first, dictators seek to control the literature, elites hoard the knowledge that is power. Shi Huangdi, the Chinese emperor of the 3rd century BC, ordered that all literature, history and philosophy written before the founding of his dynasty should be destroyed. More books were burnt in the 20th century than any other—in Nazi Germany, Bosnia and Afghanistan. With the online library, the books will finally be safe, and the bibliophobes will have been beaten, for ever.

  11. 1U One point:

  12. 10 (a) In your own words ... explain what, according to the writer, the potential disadvantage of the online library is (1U) • But now a revolution, widely compared to the invention of printing itself, is taking place among the book shelves, and the library will never be the same again. This week Google announced plans to digitise fifteen million books from five great libraries, including the Bodleian. • Some fear that this total library, vast and invisible, could finally destroy traditional libraries, which will become mere warehouses for the physical objects, empty of people and life. However, the advantages of a single scholarly online catalogue are incalculable and rather than destroying libraries, the internet will protect the written word as never before, and render knowledge genuinely democratic. Fanatics always attack the libraries first, dictators seek to control the literature, elites hoard the knowledge that is power. Shi Huangdi, the Chinese emperor of the 3rd century BC, ordered that all literature, history and philosophy written before the founding of his dynasty should be destroyed. More books were burnt in the 20th century than any other—in Nazi Germany, Bosnia and Afghanistan. With the online library, the books will finally be safe, and the bibliophobes will have been beaten, for ever

  13. 1U • could finally destroy traditional libraries, which will become mere warehouses for the physical objects, empty of people and life • A potential disadvantage is that libraries, in the form we have known them up until now, will become simply storage spaces for books and no humans will ever visit them.

  14. 1U • could finally destroy traditional libraries, which will become mere warehouses for the physical objects, empty of people and life • A potential disadvantage is that libraries, in the form we have known them up until now, will become simply storage spaces for books and no humans will ever visit them.

  15. Marking instructions • There must be some attempt to use own words. Blatant lifts: 0. • It could signal the end of conventional libraries, (which will no longer be used) (1 mark) − i.e. a basic understanding of “could finally destroy traditional libraries, which will become mere warehouses for the physical objects, empty of people and life” (lines 28-30). • A gloss on “destroy” which suggests merely the physical demolition of libraries: 0.

  16. 10 (a) In your own words ... explain (b) what, according to the writer, the advantages of the online library are. 3U(2007) • But now a revolution, widely compared to the invention of printing itself, is taking place among the book shelves, and the library will never be the same again. This week Google announced plans to digitise fifteen million books from five great libraries, including the Bodleian. • Some fear that this total library, vast and invisible, could finally destroy traditional libraries, which will become mere warehouses for the physical objects, empty of people and life. However, the advantages of a single scholarly online catalogue are incalculable and rather than destroying libraries, the internet will protect the written word as never before, and render knowledge genuinely democratic. Fanatics always attack the libraries first, dictators seek to control the literature, elites hoard the knowledge that is power. Shi Huangdi, the Chinese emperor of the 3rd century BC, ordered that all literature, history and philosophy written before the founding of his dynasty should be destroyed. More books were burnt in the 20th century than any other—in Nazi Germany, Bosnia and Afghanistan. With the online library, the books will finally be safe, and the bibliophobes will have been beaten, for ever

  17. 3U Three points:

  18. 10 (a) In your own words ... explain (b) what, according to the writer, the advantages of the online library are (3U) • But now a revolution, widely compared to the invention of printing itself, is taking place among the book shelves, and the library will never be the same again. This week Google announced plans to digitise fifteen million books from five great libraries, including the Bodleian. • Some fear that this total library, vast and invisible, could finally destroy traditional libraries, which will become mere warehouses for the physical objects, empty of people and life. However, the advantages of a single scholarly online catalogue are incalculable and rather than destroying libraries, the internet will protect the written word as never before, andrender knowledge genuinely democratic. Fanatics always attack the libraries first, dictators seek to control the literature, elites hoard the knowledge that is power. Shi Huangdi, the Chinese emperor of the 3rd century BC, ordered that all literature, history and philosophy written before the founding of his dynasty should be destroyed. More books were burnt in the 20th century than any other—in Nazi Germany, Bosnia and Afghanistan. With the online library, the books will finally be safe, and the bibliophobes will have been beaten, for ever

  19. 1 • the advantages of a single scholarly online catalogue are incalculable • There are countless positives in favour of all books being kept in the same place in one catalogue.

  20. 2 • and render knowledge genuinely democratic • They make facts and truth available for all, which is fairer.

  21. 3 • rather than destroying libraries, the internet will protect the written word as never before • With the online library, the books will finally be safe • Books and libraries will be safeguarded by online libraries.

  22. 4 • Fanatics always attack the libraries first, dictators seek to control the literature, elites hoard the knowledge that is power • Politicians in charge of extreme regimes often try to restrict what people are allowed to read; online libraries will mean this is not possible.

  23. Marking instructions • There must be some attempt to use own words. Blatant lifts: 0. • Any three of the following for 1 mark each: • 1 a single catalogue will ensure that everything is stored in one place • 2 democracy – knowledge will be available to all • 3 it will be impossible to wipe out knowledge (by destroying books) • 4 totalitarian states will not be able to keep knowledge to themselves/deny it to the masses.

  24. “Quote” (word/phrase/expression) (U) • Find the correct lines. • Check whether the question asks for a word or phrase. • Write down exactly as it is in passage.

  25. Key words • ...with close reference to the text... • Justify your answer by close reference to lines ...

  26. 2. In your opinion, does the writer think Glasgow Council gave the library in Drumchapel a high priority? Justify your answer by close reference to lines 8–14. 2U/E (2007) • My love affair with libraries started early, in the Drumchapel housing scheme in the Fifties. For the 60,000 exiles packed off from slum housing to the city’s outer fringe, Glasgow Council neglected the shops and amenities but somehow remembered to put in a public library—actually, a wooden shed. That library was split into two—an adult section and a children’s section. This was an early taste of forbidden fruit. Much useful human reproductive knowledge was gained from certain books examined surreptitiously in the adult biology section.

  27. 2U/E Two points:

  28. 2. In your opinion, does the writer think Glasgow Council gave the library in Drumchapel a high priority? Justify your answer by close reference to lines 8–14. 2U/E (2007) • My love affair with libraries started early, in the Drumchapel housing scheme in the Fifties. For the 60,000 exiles packed off from slum housing to the city’s outer fringe, Glasgow Council neglected the shops and amenities but somehow remembered to put in a public library—actually, a wooden shed. That library was split into two—an adult section and a children’s section. This was an early taste of forbidden fruit. Much useful human reproductive knowledge was gained from certain books examined surreptitiously in the adult biology section.

  29. “neglected the shops and amenities but somehow remembered to put in a public library” • The fact that they “neglected the shops and amenities” yet “somehow remembered to put in a public library” suggests that they were a high priority as other (essential) services were forgotten but libraries were not.

  30. “actually, a wooden shed” • The fact it was a “wooden shed” suggests it was basic, cheap, unsophisticated, temporary and therefore considered of little importance.

  31. Marking instructions • Candidates could argue either way or on both sides. Marks will depend on the quality of explanation. A single basic point will be worth 1 mark; a more developed justification will be worth 2 marks. Reference alone: 0. • Possible answers: • “High priority”: • 1 use of “remembered” suggests that the library, although initially overlooked, was indeed a priority • 2 despite the fact they “neglected shops and amenities”, they still put in a library, which suggests that it was considered more important than these • “Low priority”: • 3 the high number (60,000) of potential users contrasted with the smallness of the facility (a “shed”) suggests inadequacy • 4 use of “remembered” suggests it was an afterthought, a last-minute idea • 5 the fact it was a “wooden shed” suggests it was basic, cheap, unsophisticated, temporary and therefore considered of little importance • 6 the use of “somehow” indicates that nobody was sure why the decision had been taken; it just happened • 7 tone of “− actually, a wooden shed” as if a rather amused, sarcastic aside suggesting an afterthought, a wry admission of its inadequacies…

  32. Context (U) • Find two quotes from the surrounding sentence(s) that clarify the meaning. • Explain what ‘clues’ they give you about the word’s meaning. • Write down the word’s meaning (definition)

  33. 6. Read lines 48–68. (a) What does the phrase “doomsday scenario” (line 51) mean? 1U (2009) • It is certainly possible that the premises advanced by environmental campaigners are sound: that we are in mortal danger from global warming and that this is a result of human activity. Yet when I listen to ecological warnings such as these, I am reminded of a doomsday scenario from the past. • In his Essay on the Principle of Population, published in 1798, Thomas Malthus demonstrated, in what appeared to be indisputable mathematical terms, that population growth would exceed the limits of food supply by the middle of the 19th century. Only plague, war or natural disaster would be capable of sufficiently reducing the numbers of people to avert mass starvation within roughly 50 years. This account of the world’s inevitable fate (known as the “Malthusian catastrophe”) was as much part of accepted thinking among intellectuals then as are the environmental lobby’s warnings today. • Malthus, however, had made a critical conceptual mistake: he underestimated the complexity of human behaviour. Population did not go on increasing at the same rate; it responded to economic and social conditions. Moreover, he had discounted the force of ingenuity in finding ways to increase food supply. In actual fact, the introduction of intensive farming methods and the invention of pesticides transformed what he had assumed would be the simple, fixed relation between numbers of people and amount of resource. He had made what seemed to be a sound prediction without allowing for the possibility that inventiveness and innovation might alter the picture in unimaginable ways.

  34. 6. Read lines 48–68. (a) What does the phrase “doomsday scenario” (line 51) mean? 1U (2009) • It is certainly possible that the premises advanced by environmental campaigners are sound: that we are in mortal danger from global warming and that this is a result of human activity. Yet when I listen to ecological warnings such as these, I am reminded of a doomsday scenario from the past. • In his Essay on the Principle of Population, published in 1798, Thomas Malthus demonstrated, in what appeared to be indisputable mathematical terms, that population growth would exceed the limits of food supply by the middle of the 19th century. Only plague, war or natural disaster would be capable of sufficiently reducing the numbers of people to avert mass starvation within roughly 50 years. This account of the world’s inevitable fate (known as the “Malthusian catastrophe”) was as much part of accepted thinking among intellectuals then as are the environmental lobby’s warnings today. • Malthus, however, had made a critical conceptual mistake: he underestimated the complexity of human behaviour. Population did not go on increasing at the same rate; it responded to economic and social conditions. Moreover, he had discounted the force of ingenuity in finding ways to increase food supply. In actual fact, the introduction of intensive farming methods and the invention of pesticides transformed what he had assumed would be the simple, fixed relation between numbers of people and amount of resource. He had made what seemed to be a sound prediction without allowing for the possibility that inventiveness and innovation might alter the picture in unimaginable ways.

  35. 1U

  36. 6. Read lines 48–68. (a) What does the phrase “doomsday scenario” (line 51) mean? 1U (2009) • It is certainly possible that the premises advanced by environmental campaigners are sound: that we are in mortal danger from global warming and that this is a result of human activity. Yet when I listen to ecological warnings such as these, I am reminded of a doomsday scenario from the past. • In his Essay on the Principle of Population, published in 1798, Thomas Malthus demonstrated, in what appeared to be indisputable mathematical terms, that population growth would exceed the limits of food supply by the middle of the 19th century. Only plague, war or natural disaster would be capable of sufficiently reducing the numbers of people to avert mass starvation within roughly 50 years. This account of the world’s inevitable fate (known as the “Malthusian catastrophe”) was as much part of accepted thinking among intellectuals then as are the environmental lobby’s warnings today. • Malthus, however, had made a critical conceptual mistake: he underestimated the complexity of human behaviour. Population did not go on increasing at the same rate; it responded to economic and social conditions. Moreover, he had discounted the force of ingenuity in finding ways to increase food supply. In actual fact, the introduction of intensive farming methods and the invention of pesticides transformed what he had assumed would be the simple, fixed relation between numbers of people and amount of resource. He had made what seemed to be a sound prediction without allowing for the possibility that inventiveness and innovation might alter the picture in unimaginable ways.

  37. We are told Thomas Malthus predicted “mass starvation”, which is listed as an example of a doomsday scenario. • From this we can work out that it is a hypothesis on how the world is going to turn out and that it is overwhelmingly negative. • Therefore, doomsday scenario means a situation which is similar to the end of the world as we know it.

  38. Marking instructions • Any acceptable gloss, e.g. (a hypothesis that suggests) the end of the world, global disaster, human annihilation, …

  39. Link (U) • Summarise what the previous section is about. • Quote words from the link sentence which refer back to this. • Summarise what is being said in the section following the link sentence. • Quote a word or phrase from the link sentence which introduces the next section.

  40. 3. Read lines 21–29. (a) By referring to specific words or phrases, show how lines 21–24 perform a linking function at this stage in the writer’s argument. 2U (2008 paper) • It might be thought—indeed, it is widely assumed—that it must be good for the countryside to be returned to the central position it enjoyed in British life long ago. Yet there is a particularly worrying aspect of the new rural mania that suggests it might finally do the countryside more harm than good. • This is the identification, in the current clamour, of the countryside in general and the landscape in particular with the past—the insistence on the part of those who claim to have the best intentions of ruralism at heart that their aim is to protect what they glibly refer to as “our heritage”. This wildly over-used term is seriously misleading, not least because nobody appears ever to have asked what it means.

  41. 2U 1 2

  42. Previous lines (15 – 20) • Then there is the proliferation of action groups dedicated to stopping construction of roads, airports, railway lines, factories, shopping centres and houses in rural areas, while multifarious organisations have become accustomed to expending their time and energies in monitoring and reporting on the state of grassland, water, trees, moorlands, uplands, lowlands, birds’ eggs, wildflowers, badgers, historical sites and countless other aspects of the landscape and its inhabitants.

  43. 3. Read lines 21–29. (a) By referring to specific words or phrases, show how lines 21–24 perform a linking function at this stage in the writer’s argument. 2U (2008 paper) • It might be thought—indeed, it is widely assumed—that it must be good for the countryside to be returned to the central position it enjoyed in British life long ago. Yet there is a particularly worrying aspect of the new rural mania that suggests it might finally do the countryside more harm than good. • This is the identification, in the current clamour, of the countryside in general and the landscape in particular with the past—the insistence on the part of those who claim to have the best intentions of ruralism at heart that their aim is to protect what they glibly refer to as “our heritage”. This wildly over-used term is seriously misleading, not least because nobody appears ever to have asked what it means.

  44. 1 • “it must be good for the countryside to be returned to the central position it enjoyed in British life long ago” • This refers back to the aim of the action groups mentioned in lines 15-20

  45. 2 • Yet there is a particularly worrying aspect of the new rural mania that suggests it might finally do the countryside more harm than good. • This looks forward to worries the writer has, such as rural areas being firmly linked to times that have passed.

  46. Marking instructions • For full marks answers must refer to specific words or phrases and explain the precise nature of the link to what precedes or follows. • Two elements are required, e.g.: • 1 “returned to the central position” refers to the aim of the action groups mentioned in lines 15-20 (no credit for the quotation unless the reference back is identified) • 2 “worrying aspect” points forward to concerns the writer has (no credit for the quotation unless the reference forward is identified)

  47. Summarise (U) • Identify the key points / issues from the relevant section. • Change these points into your own words. • Bullet point if appropriate. • Check the marks available as a guide to how many points you are required to summarise.

  48. 5. Read lines 29–47. (b) Using your own words as far as possible, summarise the benefits of technology as described in lines 35–43. 3U (2009) Even devising a way of making a living while never leaving your house would not absolve you of your ecological guilt, because you’d still be making liberal use of the technology that has transformed domestic life. The working classes, having only discovered in the last generation or two the comforts of a tolerable degree of warmth and plentiful hot water, are now being told that these things must be rationed or prohibitively taxed. Never mind that the universal presence of adequate heating has almost eliminated those perennial scourges of the poor—bronchitis and pneumonia—which once took the very young and the very old in huge numbers every winter. Never mind that the generous use of hot water and detergent, particularly when combined in a washing machine for the laundering of bed linen and clothing, has virtually eliminated the infestations of body lice and fleas (which once carried plague) that used to be a commonplace feature of poverty. Never mind that the private car, the Green Public Enemy Number One, has given ordinary families freedom and flexibility that would have been inconceivable in previous generations. If politicians are planning restrictions on these “polluting” aspects of private life, to be enforced by a price mechanism, they had better accept that they will be reconstructing a class divide that will drastically affect the quality of life of those on the wrong side of it.

  49. 3U

More Related