1 / 24

http://www.icpf.cas.cz/

Influence of ionic liquid content on properties of dense polymer membranes. http://www.icpf.cas.cz/. M. Kohoutová a , A. Sikora b , Š. Hovorka c , A. Randová c , M. Tišma d , P. Izák a

elden
Download Presentation

http://www.icpf.cas.cz/

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Influence of ionic liquid content on properties of dense polymer membranes http://www.icpf.cas.cz/ M. Kohoutová a , A. Sikora b , Š. Hovorka c , A. Randová c, M. Tišmad, P. Izák a aDepartment of Separation Process, Institute of Chemical Process Fundamentals, Rozvojová 135, 165 02 Prague 6, Czech Republic b Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Heyrovského nám. 2, 162 06 Prague 6, Czech Republic cInstitute of Chemical Technology, Technická 5, 160 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic dFaculty of Food Technology Osijek, University of Osijek, F. Kuhača 18, 31 000 Osijek, Croatia

  2. Supported ionic liquid membranes offer a range of possible advantages: • Molecular diffusion - higher in liquids than in solids, allowing high fluxes; • The selectivity of the separation can be influenced by variation of the liquid - especially ionic liquids offer the advantage of a wide variety of properties; • Ionic liquids as liquid membranes - allow three-phase systems due to their special mixing behavior;

  3. Due to their good thermal stability, reactive processes - at high temperatures (up to around 250 ºC), which leads to faster kinetics in the case of endothermic reactions; • The use of nano-, ultra- and micro-filtration ceramic modules -diminish concentration polarization due to rough liquid-membrane surface; • Contrary to the extraction, only small amounts of liquids are necessary to form the liquid membrane, thus allowing the use of more expensive materials.

  4. The “only” problem is long time stability of the liquid in the pores. Stability of the hydrophobic ILs inside the pores (in hours)

  5. Experimental • Membranes preparation: PDMS Elastosil M4601 (base & crosslinking catalyst) (Wacker Silicones, Germany) • IL – benzyl-3-butylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (Chemada Fine Chemicals, Israel) • 10, 20, 30 wt. % of IL • Average thickness 0.3 ± 0.017 mm • Conditions : 37°C, 5 wt.% butan-1-ol, N2 flow rate 0.9 ml/s, 48 hours • Analysis : Finnigan GC Trace Ultra GC – TCD;

  6. Temperature dependences of DSC heat flow of the blend containing 30% of [BBIM][BF4] (a) heating mode (10°C/min) preceded by cooling (10°C/min) (b) heating mode (10°C/min) preceded by cooling (1°C/min) (c) heating mode (5°C/min) preceded by cooling (1°C/min Tg,IL appeard only in the blend with 30wt.% IL when the sample was cooled and heated slowly PDMS and [BBIM][BF4] are not compatibile; blend contains amorphous and crystalline phases of PDMS and dispersed phases of [BBIM][BF4] Compatibility of PDMS and [BBIM][BF4]

  7. Dependence of preferential and total sorption Ωi ,Q respectively of butan-1-ol from 5 wt.% butan-1-ol aqueous solution on [BBIM][BF4] content in PDMS membrane (sorption from liquid solution) Butan-1-ol is sorbed preferentially Preferential sorption is a linear function of IL content (30wt.%) Total sorption increases with the amount of IL in the blend Sorption of binary mixture water – butan-1-ol

  8. Retentate Feed Permeate Reaction vessel Vacuum pump Cold trap Permeate Pervaporation set-up Pervaporation experiment – standard laboratory pervaporation set-up with effective membrane area of 5 cm2 ; downstream pressure p = 60 Pa Thermostat

  9. Dependence of separation factor αbw and total permeation flux J on [BBIM][BF4] content in PDMS membrane Total permeation flux and separation factor increases with the [BBIM][BF4] concentration in membrane Pervaporaton of binary mixture water – butan-1-ol

  10. Experimental As a support matrix for the polymer-IL membrane the ceramic ultrafiltration module made from TiO2 with pore size 60 nm was used. The PDMS was prepared by mixing a solution of RTV 615A and RTV 615B (General Electric) in 10:1 ratio at 60°C for 0.5 hour. 15 wt% of tetrapropylammonium tetracyano-borate ionic liquidand 85 wt% polydimethylsiloxane(IL1). 50 wt% of 1-ethenyl-3-ethyl-imidazolium hexafluorophosphate ionic liquid was mixed with 50 wt% polydimethylsiloxane - (IL2).

  11. The ternary system - practical application in biotransformation processes, where the fermentation broth from Clostridium acetobutylicum is normally used The compound of interest is biofuel, namely BIObutanol It is the main product of butan-1-ol fermentation and it is also the primary inhibitory product affecting the bioconversion

  12. Dependence of permeate permeation flux on feed concentration at 37°C

  13. Dependence of enrichment factor of permeate on feed concentration at 37°C

  14. The enrichment factor of butan-1-ol increased from 2.2 (PDMS) up to 10.9 (IL2-PDMS) (Izák P, Ruth W, Dyson P, Kragl U (2007) Selective Removal of Acetone and Butan-1-ol from Water with Supported Ionic Liquid - Polydimethylsiloxane Membrane by Pervaporation, Chem. Eng. J., 139/2 (2008) 318-321) Fermentation was carried out at37°C and pH 4.5. Firstly, a continuous fermentation with removal of ABE by pervaporation was measured without any butan-1-ol addition to test, if the SILM was selective and stable.

  15. Experiment • C. Acetobutylicum ATCC 824 was grown under anaerobic phosphate-limited conditions. • In the chosen fermentation system, especially the phosphate concentrations as well as the dilution rates were responsible for the amount of produced solvents.

  16. Retentate Feed 4 3 Permeate 5 6 1 2 Vac Schema of continuous culture fermentation connectedwith pervaporation 1.Waste tank; 2. Tank with substrate; 3. Culture vessel; 4. Pervaporation cell; 5. Cold trap; 6. Vacuum pump

  17. Butan-1-ol addition Pervaporation off Dependence of permeate concentration on fermentation time at 37°C, at dilution rate 0.075 h-1, 0.5 mM phosphate concentration in supplying vessel and pH 4.5. ● Butan-1-ol (summary of the produced and added butan-1-ol); ∆ Acetone; □ Ethanol;  Acetate; x Butyrate

  18. Butan-1-ol addition Pervaporation off Dependence of optical density and butan-1-ol concentration on time of fermentation ─ Butan-1-ol concentration; Optical density

  19. After successful tests, the concentration of butan-1-ol was several times increased to test the SILM under more stringent conditions and to study the effect of pervaporation on the cells. • After 3 months of the experiment we did not observe any change of mass or selectivity of IL in the pores of the ultrafiltration membrane.

  20. Dependence of butan-1-ol and acetone permeation flux on its culture vessel concentration. ● Butan-1-ol; ∆ Acetone

  21. Dependence of butan-1-ol and acetone enrichment factor on its culture vessel concentration. ● Butan-1-ol; ∆ Acetone

  22. Conclusions To get more effective ABE removalfrom fermentor we used pervaporation with IL-PDMS nonporous membrane. Using this membrane we were able to remove ABE from the culture supernatant more effectively than it was described by others (Qureshi et al. (1992), Soni et al. (1987), Liu et al. (2004)).

  23. Conclusions The supported ionic liquid membranes were weighted after all experiments and no weight changes were observed – stable SILM. Higher diffusion coefficient is most probably responsible for higher permeation flux and enrichment factors of butan-1-ol in IL-PDMS membrane. If we would run pervaporation with continuous and complete removal of butan-1-ol from the culture supernatant, it would lead to more stable fermentation process with higher production of BIObutanol.

  24. Acknowledgement Thank you for your attention This research was supported partially by grant No. 104/08/0600 from Czech Science Foundationand Marie Curie Reintegration Fellowships within the 6th European Community Framework Programme.

More Related