1 / 18

AAMC Project on the Clinical Education of Medical Students

AAMC Project on the Clinical Education of Medical Students. Education Policy Committee 12/01/2005. Background. Five reports (3 AAMC, 1 AMA, 1 Macy Foundation) from the 80’s and 90’s commented on a need to improve the clinical skills education of medical students.

Download Presentation

AAMC Project on the Clinical Education of Medical Students

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AAMC Project on the Clinical Education of Medical Students Education Policy Committee 12/01/2005

  2. Background • Five reports (3 AAMC, 1 AMA, 1 Macy Foundation) from the 80’s and 90’s commented on a need to improve the clinical skills education of medical students. • Two reports based on Petersdorf scholarships (Nutter and Whitcomb, 2001; Corbett, 2004) catalyzed national efforts to improve clinical education in medical school. • AAMC formed a Task Force on Clinical Skills Teaching in response to Corbett’s work in 2002-2003.

  3. Background • Corbett EC and Whitcomb M: The AAMC Project on the Clinical Education of Medical Students. Clinical Skills Education. Washington , DC: AAMC, 2004.

  4. The Problem • Clinical skills education in medical school is largely unstructured and unspecified. • Clinical skills education is not conducted with the same rigor as is clinical knowledge education. • Medical students are increasingly marginalized in the clinical environment where skills must be acquired. • A fourth year spent in electives does little to enhance basic clinical skills.

  5. The Response Thus Far • Medical educators are developing alternative methods to impart clinical skills (standardized patients, computer simulations, body models). • Explicit and detailed clinical skills curricula are being developed (largely in Europe). • Licensure and certification bodies are incorporating evaluation of clinical skills into their exams.

  6. Project Objectives • To document the status of clinical skills education in US medical schools. • To identify model approaches for teaching clinical skills. • To develop principles to guide the design of an ideal clinical skills curriculum. • To make recommendations for improving under-graduate clinical skills education.

  7. Secondary Objectives • Dissemination of information on the state of clinical skills education. • Promote a national dialogue about evaluating and improving clinical skills education. • Assist individual schools in efforts to improve clinical skills education. • Promote a national dialogue on the integration of clinical skills curricula across the continuum of undergraduate and graduate med ed.

  8. Project Activities • 1. Literature and database review (LCME surveys, AAMC Graduate Questionnaire, CurrMIT). • 2. Review of historical reports of clinical skills ed. • 3. Email survey of US and Canadian curricular deans. • 4. Site visits to six US and 4 European medical schools. • 5. Attendance at national and international med ed meetings. • 6. Development of consensus regarding CSE with national clerkship organizations

  9. Observations • Status of Clinical Skills Education • There are no curricular standards for CSE. • There is tremendous variability in CSE. • Few schools approach CSE as a four-year continuum. • Only a few schools have explicit CSE standards, and those that do have variable standards.

  10. Observations • Status of Clinical Skills Education • Most schools provide some formal CSE in Y1 and Y2, but vary hugely in how CSE is accomplished and assessed, and who participates. • Schools assume that students acquire clinical skills during clerkships, but do not assess this. • No explicit clinical skills developmental process bridges the continuum of undergraduate and graduate med ed.

  11. Observations • Clinical Skills Assessment • Few schools have an organized approach for assessing CS in a developmental manner. • Most assess CS at some time, but do not systematically relate the assessment to objectives. • Standardized patient programs are used by 67 schools. • Paper exams are used to assess skills by 20%. • Only 25 schools use direct faculty observation in the assessment of CS.

  12. Observations • Clinical Skills Assessment • About 50% of clerkships use standardized patients or OCSEs for student evaluation. • Students and schools vary in reports of faculty involvement in CS assessment!!! • Schools with established skills programs do assess often, with a higher proportion of faculty and peer assessment.

  13. Observations • Clinical Skills Centers • 34 schools had a clinical skills center in place. • 9 indicated that establishment was in process. • US centers focus on H&P skills. • European centers also assess clinical testing and procedural skills. • Centers vary widely in their methods for teaching and assessment, and in the frequency of encounters.

  14. Observations • Clinical Skills Centers • Some centers continuously coordinate CSE within curriculum (central planning). • Some centers act as a resource for departmental assessment activities (States’ rights). • Feedback is variable, often not by faculty, and generally summative, rather than formative. • Clinical faculty participation is extremely variable, and often limited to a few true believers.

  15. Observations • Clinical Skills Centers • Few centers have a customized remediation program to address individual student needs. • Most participation occurs in Years 1 & 2. • Most centers have a medical director. • Few centers allow self-directed education by students. • Almost no centers serve as resources for faculty development. • Programs evaluate themselves, but their performance databases are opaque.

  16. Summary • CSE in US schools is largely an implicit process, with wide variability in emphasis and methods. • There is no national consensus on what comprises basic CSE. • Formal attention to skills development is under-standardized, or even substandard. • Emphasis on CSE has been diminishing over recent decades.

  17. Summary • Essential elements for effective CSE are: • - a skilled and willing teacher • - a prepared and motivated student • - an informed and willing patient • - time for repeated skills practice with several patients • - an attitude of shared professional responsibility toward the patient by teacher and student • - time and opportunity for effective feedback

  18. The Gritty Nub • There must be a thorough delineation of the CS that need to be taught, and of how and when CS should be learned, as students progress through the curriculum. • Policies and procedures that support and reward participating clinical faculty are mandatory. • Identification of a core group of committed, competent, responsible clinical faculty is essential. • A national dialogue, and consensus, would be extremely helpful to resolution of deficiencies in CSE.

More Related