1 / 18

Outline

Internet Traffic Modeling Poisson Model vs. Self-Similar Model By Srividhya Chandrasekaran Dept of CS University of Houston. Outline. Introduction Poisson model Self-Similar model Poisson model vs. Self-Similar model Experimental Result Co-Existence Remarks References. Introduction.

elinor
Download Presentation

Outline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Internet Traffic ModelingPoisson Model vs. Self-Similar ModelBySrividhya ChandrasekaranDept of CSUniversity of Houston

  2. Outline • Introduction • Poisson model • Self-Similar model • Poisson model vs. Self-Similar model • Experimental Result • Co-Existence • Remarks • References

  3. Introduction • What is a model? • Why do we need modeling? • What are the kinds of models available? • What are the models that I have discussed?

  4. Poisson Model • Poisson Process : Describes the number of times that some known event has occurred as a function of time, where events can occur at random times. • Network traffic : Considered as a random arrival process under Poisson modeling.

  5. Packet arrival is considered as 1 or ON state and the inter arrival time is 0 or OFF state

  6. Self-Similar Model • Self-Similarity: Something that feels the same irrespective of the scale. • In case of stochastic objects like time-series, self-similarity is used in the distributional sense • Long Range Dependence (LRD): The traffic is similar in longer spans of time.

  7. Poisson Model vs. Self-Similar Model • Poisson model considers network arrival as a random process. • Self-similarity uses autocorrelation and does not consider the network traffic to be random.

  8. Poisson Model: Does not scale the Bursty Traffic properly. In fine scale, Bursty Traffic Appears Bursty, while in Coarse scale, Bursty Traffic appears smoothed out and looks like random noise. Poisson Model vs. Self-Similar Model

  9. Self-Similar Model Scales Bursty traffic well, because it has similar characteristics on any scale. Gives a more accurate pictures due to Long Range Dependence in the network traffic Poisson Model vs. Self-Similar Model

  10. Experimental Results • Researchers from UCal Berkeley, found that Poisson model could not accurately capture the network traffic.

  11. Bellcode research group’s experiments show that traffic is Self-Similar

  12. Co-Existence • Bell labs research shows that both the models can co-exist. • In a low congestion link, Long Range Dependence characteristics are observed. • As load increases, the model is pushed to Poisson. • As load decreases, model pushed to Self-Similarity.

  13. Remarks • Two models to describe network traffic: • Poisson model • Self-Similar model • Each has its own advantage. • Both the models can co-exist to give a more exact picture.

  14. References: • A Nonstationary Poisson view of Internet Traffic; TKaragiannis, M.Molle, M.Falautsos, A.Broido; Infocom in 2004 • On Internet traffic Dynamics and Internet Topology II:Inter Model Validation; W.Willinger; AT&T Labs-Research • Internet Traffic Tends Towards Poisson and Independent as the Load Increases; J.Cio, W.S.Cleveland, D.Lin, D.X.Sun; Nonlinear Estimation and Classification eds, 2002 • On the Self-Similar Nature of Ethernet Traffic; W.Leland, M.s. Taqqu W.Willingfer, D.V.Wilson; ACM Sigcomm • Proof of a fundamental Result in Self-Similar Traffic Modeling; M.S.Taqqu, W.Willinger, R.Sherman. ACMCCR: Computer Communication Review • Self-Similarity; http://students.cs.byu.edu • Traffic modeling of IP Networks Using the Batch Markovian Arrival Process; A.Klemm, C.Lindemann, M Lohmann; ACM 2003 • Modelling and control of broadband traffic using multiplicative fractal cascades; P.M.Krishna,V.M.Gadre, U.B.Desai; IIT, Bombay

  15. References Contd.. • http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary/stochastic+process • http://www.sics.se/~aeg/report/node9.html • http://www.sics.se/~aeg/report/node23.html • The Effect of Statistical Multiplexing on the Long-Range Dependence of Internet Packet Traffic; Jin Cao, William S. Cleveland, Dong Lin, Don X. Su; Bell Labs Technical Report • http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PoissonDistribution.html • http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PoissonProcess.html • http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda366j.htm • http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/section3/eda35c.htm • Wide-Area Traffic: The Failure of Poisson Modeling; Vern Paxson and Sally Floyd; University of California, Berkeley • Mathematical Modeling of the internet; F.Kelly, Statistical Laboratory, Univ of Cambridge. • Internet Traffic modeling: Markovian Approach to self similarity traffic and prediction of Loss Probability for Finite Queues; S.Kasahara; IEICE Trans Communications, 2001

  16. Questions

More Related