1 / 27

Conservation Restrictions in Conservation Subdivisions Joel Russell and Robert Levite March 2012

Conservation Restrictions in Conservation Subdivisions Joel Russell and Robert Levite March 2012. Conservation Subdivisions. • Purpose: to preserve important open space while allowing compatible development; also called Clustering, OSRD, NRPZ, flexible development, etc.

eljah
Download Presentation

Conservation Restrictions in Conservation Subdivisions Joel Russell and Robert Levite March 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Conservation Restrictions in Conservation Subdivisions Joel Russell and Robert LeviteMarch 2012

  2. Conservation Subdivisions •Purpose: to preserve important open space while allowing compatible development; also called Clustering, OSRD, NRPZ, flexible development, etc. • Statutory framework: Ch 40A, Sec. 9; Home Rule Amendment; Ch. 184, Sec. 31-33; Subdivision Control Law (Ch. 41) • Why a CR? Why not note on plan or deed restriction? • Relationship to OSRP, trail networks, town master plan, CPA, APR program, self-help grants, etc. • Importance of Conservation Analysis

  3. - Conservation analysis ensures that a mandated conservation restriction achieves its purpose. - It should be done in cooperation with the land trust that will be the prospective grantee of the restriction.

  4. Example - Step 1: Map Existing Conditions

  5. Step 2: Identify Site Constraints (primary conservation areas)

  6. Step 3: Identify Natural and Cultural Features (secondary conservation areas)

  7. MATURE BEECH STAND - Need to protect trees and root systems from damage WOOD LOT - Provides visual buffer from adjacent offsite development PRIME AGRICULTURAL SOILS - Preserve for agricultural use STONE WALL - Visual and cultural resource

  8. ROLLING LANDFORM -Contrasts with flat agricultural fields and wetlands -Grading should reflect rolling character STREAM CORRIDOR -Provides visual interest and ecological benefits -Protect riparian buffer HISTORIC MILL RUINS -Has educational value as a point of interest along public trail and road. ROAD VIEWSHED -Preserve rural road edge (i.e. landform, vegetation, shoulder) -Opportunity for natural screening (existing/new) of new structures from road

  9. Look at Context of Town Open Space Planning and Linkages

  10. Step 4: Conservation Findings (before doing a development plan) • Preserve prime agricultural land and beech stand • Preserve stone walls • Preserve historic mill ruins • Preserve “Unbuildable Land” (10.5 acres of floodplain, wetlands, stream, steep slopes) • Provide visual buffer from road

  11. Potential Conservation Restriction Plan

  12. Without conservation analysis: fragmented open space serves no conservation purpose

  13. Same plan showing wetlands and buffers

  14. “Leftover” open space

  15. Case example: 100-acre Site in Dutchess County, New York

  16. Conservation Analysis: Slopes

  17. Conservation Analysis: Soils

  18. Conservation Analysis: Water Resources

  19. Natural Features and Conservation Findings • Do not develop on steep slopes • Protect views of hillside • Minimize disturbance of water resources • Protect the best farmland • Maintain intact tract of wildlife habitat • Provide visual buffer from road

  20. Acceptable Plan

  21. Unacceptable Plan

  22. Conservation Analysis – Summing Up • Conservation Analysis puts the community in the driver’s seat to ensure that preserved land has conservation value and is not just “leftover land.” • Should be done before any subdivision design occurs and before the formal approval process begins. • Ties in the community’s comprehensive plan and open space and recreation plan • Informs decisions on uses, management, and ownership of open space land , establishing the basic terms of the conservation restriction • Should not be confused with minimum open space or density calculation.

  23. GETTING BOARDS TOGETHER • Townwide discussion on communication between boards • Required: Plg., ConsComm; Should include Open Space, BoH, CPA; Ag Comm. • Key: local and/or regional land trust • Consider town bylaw for active cooperation on how and under what circumstances open space connected to OSRD/NRPZ to be preserved; Joint board discussions • Ensure Plg. Bd. has ability to standardize all conditions and standards

  24. Issues to be Addressed - Adequate Plg Bd. Record – Historical; useful to other boards (ConsComm; Assessors; BoH); written record - Plg. Bd. hiring of experts to ensure quality of conservation analysis and relationship to other protected lands within the town - Complete survey of property and land to be protected; markers at all angles; - CR Devp. (Plg. Bd., ConsComm, Open Space, local land trust; Ag Comm.; use state model CR/APR); - Who holds the CR / fee: town, land trust; homeowners assoc.; other non-profit); CR condition of approval; CR recorded and referenced on definitive plan - CR provision for back-up CR holder;

  25. ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED - Resolve public access issues early on • Funding from developer to cover initial monitoring/stewardship - Deadline for recording CR; sooner, not later • Respons. of each party: process for funding to cover annual stewardship, monitoring, repair; • Required membership for homeowners assn; yearly fee for maintenance; automatic lien provisions • Consider town ordinance that preserves the continuity of homeowners assn.

  26. ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED • Plg. Bd. to ensure that what is supposed to happen, happens: bond, road hold back, other conditions • Plg. Bd. order that open space area/buffer not be part of staging area during constr. • Include periodic review and final walkthru of devp. before releasing bond, road hold back, etc. • Signage issues for public, abutters • Baseline documentation report (BDR) for open space; use photos and GPS coordinates

  27. ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED • Plg. Bd. determination on detention and retention ponds, swales re: maintenance, repair, replacement (POTW) • Memorialize decisions on permanent signage for access; usage; banned activities • Consider town bylaws/regulations involving protected property – allows for better commun. between entity doing enforcement and local police

More Related