1 / 28

Cities and Suburbs

Cities and Suburbs. Regionalism, Inequities, and Solutions. Material taken from:. The “Power of Place”. Comparing three Congressional districts poor central city working class, struggling city & suburban district wealthy outer-ring suburban. New York’s 16th Congressional District.

elliott
Download Presentation

Cities and Suburbs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cities and Suburbs Regionalism, Inequities, and Solutions

  2. Material taken from:

  3. The “Power of Place” • Comparing three Congressional districts • poor central city • working class, struggling city & suburban district • wealthy outer-ring suburban

  4. New York’s 16th Congressional District

  5. New York’s 16th Congressional District • Poorest and one of most Democratic Congressional districts in the nation • Until 1960 was haven for Italian, Irish, & Jewish working- & middle-class families • Between 1969 and 1996 manufacturing jobs fell from 51,800 to 14,100

  6. New York’s 16th Congressional District • Influx of poor Puerto Ricans • blight caused by construction of Cross-Bronx Expressway, hastened white flight

  7. New York’s 16th Congressional District • High poverty & high percentage children (> 1/3 population under 18 in 1990) • Jonathan Kozol writes about in his book Amazing Grace: 1991 median household income=$7,600 • Revival in 1980s & 1990s • 57,000 housing units built or rehabbed

  8. New York’s 16th Congressional District • Successful CDCs • reverse population losses, but • still uphill battle to reduce poverty

  9. Ohio’s 10th Congressional District

  10. Ohio’s 10th Congressional District • Population center moving west out of the city of Cleveland--1/2 of electorate outside of city limits • city neighborhoods, working class suburbs, and newer middle-class suburbs

  11. Ohio’s 10th Congressional District • Over 94% white • voters are socially conservative and economically liberal • Between 1970 & 1983 the Cleveland Region lost 1/4 of all of its manufacturing jobs

  12. Ohio’s 10th Congressional District • Economic restructuring unevenly distributed across district • by 1987 poverty rate on Cleveland’s Westside is 25 percent (three times higher than the district as a whole--8%) • Population loss • Increase gang activity in suburbs

  13. Ohio’s 10th Congressional District • Highway expansion aided migration from Parma to Strongsville & Medina • Greater voter turnout than in the South Bronx

  14. Illinois 13th Congressional District

  15. Illinois 13th Congressional District • Affluent suburbs • major growth area • population • corporate HQs: McDonald’s, Ace Hardware, Spiegel • growth stimulated by govt. spending • roads • schools • colleges

  16. Illinois 13th Congressional District • Naperville pop. • 7,000 in 1950 • 128,000 in 2000 • Children living in poverty (2000) • Naperville-1.1% • Chicago-33.6% • Revenues to support rapid growth come from attracting even more new growth • Overwhelming psychological force “to be a success”

  17. The Problem of economic segregation • Place matters • housing availability • shopping • schools • community safety • voter engagement • government investment

  18. Rising inequality

  19. Rising Inequality

  20. A shrinking middle-class • Number of persons living in families making 50-200% of US median income, declined from 68% in 1979 to 61.5% in 1998. • Groups at the top (over 200% of median) and the bottom (under 50% of median) grew

  21. Concentrating wealth • Between 1989-1998 • median wages grew by 2.4% • CEO compensation grew by 90.6% • Average CEO vs. average worker • 1978= 29:1 • 1999= 109:1

  22. Benefits of the 1990s boom was not shared by all • Yes, there were improvements: • wages increased 6.4 percent from 1995-1999 after 15 years of stagnation • by 1997 the poverty rate began to fall (in 1999 it was 11.8 percent; the lowest since 1979) • household income grew faster in cities than suburbs • 80% of the 2.2 million households moving out of poverty in 1999 lived in cities

  23. Benefits of the 1990s boom was not shared by all • BUT, the “average” improvements were not seen in all communities, cities, and regions • spatial mismatch • Westchester Co. NY--6th richest in nation and highest per capita homelessness in nation (1989)

  24. Benefits of the 1990s boom was not shared by all • “Gendered job distribution:” Women more likely accept low-paying jobs to gain flexible schedules or better commuting patterns to facilitate raising children • banks gain/homeowners pay: with flight from cities/older suburbs mortgage debt increased from $1.1 to 5 trillion (1980-99)

  25. Benefits of the 1990s boom was not shared by all • Different cities have different fiscal capacity that affect residents’ opportunities • old industrial cities (Baltimore, Cleveland, Detroit) • old industrial cities w/ more diverse economies (NYC, Chicago, Boston, San Francisco) • newer cities (LA, Seattle, San Diego, Houston)

  26. So are there options to reduce disparities? • Implement programs on a metropolitan area-wide basis • Limit bidding wars (Federal govt. policies needed to limit city-suburb and region-region tax bidding wars) • Promote metropolitan cooperation and governance

  27. Options for reducing inequalities • Link community development to regional economy • Strengthen public schools • Encourage job development • Expand “Earned Income Tax Credit” program • max annual benefit $3,888 for family of three earning $9,700 or less (phased out at $31,000)

  28. Options for reducing inequalities • Raise minimum wage above poverty level • Expand health insurance and child care • Promote voting through more flexible and aggressive registration practices

More Related