1 / 27

Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks

Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks. Jaehoon Jeong , Sarah Sharafkandi and David H.C. Du Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Univ. of Minnesota International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking

erma
Download Presentation

Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks JaehoonJeong, Sarah Sharafkandi and David H.C. Du Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Univ. of Minnesota International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking Dependability issues in wireless ad hoc networks and sensor networks, 2006

  2. Outline • Introduction • Related Work • Problem Formulation • Energy-Aware Sensor Scheduling • Optimality of Sensor Scheduling • QoSv-Guaranteed Sensor Scheduling • Sensor Scheduling for Complex Roads • Performance Evaluation • Conclusion

  3. Introduction • Motivation • We investigate the properties of the Linear Sensor Network (e.g., Road Network in transportation system). • These properties can be used for a variety of applications: • Localization, Vehicle Detection, and Vehicle Tracking. • Applications of This Sensing Scheduling Algorithm • Surveillance for Security around City’s Border • Crossroad Signal Control in Transportation System • Objectives • Maximization of Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Network • Control of Detection Quality • Quality of Surveillance Guarantee (QoSv) • Contributions • Energy-aware Sensor Scheduling feasible for Mobile Target Detection and Tracking • QoSv-Guaranteed Sensor Scheduling for Complex Roads

  4. Surveillance of City Border Roads (1)

  5. Surveillance of City Border Roads (2)

  6. Vehicle Detection for Crossroad Signal Control

  7. Related Work • Temporally and Spatially Partial Coverage • The region under surveillance is covered partially in terms of time and space. • Our scheduling algorithm utilizes this partial coverage to save sensing energy. • Quality of Surveillance (QoSv) • Our QoSv is defined as the reciprocal of the average detection time. • Other QoSv was originally defined as the reciprocal value of the expected travel distance until the first detection.

  8. Problem Formulation • Assumptions • The sensors knows their location and are time-synchronized. • The sensing range is uniform-disk whose radius is r ( r is longer than a half of the road’s width). • The cost of turn-off operation is ignorable. • The vehicle’s maximum speed is bounded as: • Objective • To maximize the sensor network lifetime to satisfy the following conditions • Provide the reliable detection of every vehicle • Guarantee the desired average detection time • Facilitate the mobile target tracking after the target detection.

  9. Sensor Network Model for Road Segment

  10. Key Idea to This Scheduling • How to have some sleeping time to save energy? • We observe that the vehicle needs time l/v to pass the road segment. • Time l/v is the sleeping time for all the sensors on the road segment.

  11. Energy-Aware Sensor Scheduling • Our sensor scheduling consists of two phases: • Initialization Phase • Surveillance Phase • Working Period + Sleeping Period

  12. Sensing Sequence for Vehicle Detection

  13. Optimality of Sensor Scheduling (1) Working Period • Sensor Network Lifetime • The following energy can be saved through sleeping: Sleeping Period • n : total number of sensors • w : working time of sensor • l : length of road • v : max possible vehicle speed • : lifetime of each sensor Number of SchdulingPeriods

  14. Optimality of Sensor Scheduling (2) • Schedule1 is this outward unidirectional scheduling, and Schedule2 is an optimal scheduling • Inequality of lifetime which results in • Actually, X should be equal to the number of working periods because after each sleeping period there should be a working period • Schedule1 is optimal scheduling • X : number of sleeping periods • l/v : upper bound on the sleeping period

  15. Considerations on Turn-On and Warming-UP Overheads • Each Sensor’s Lifetime without Sleeping • Sensor Network Lifetime through Sleeping Case 1: Turn-On Overhead is greater than Sleeping benefit Case 2: Turn-On Overhead is less than Sleeping benefit • t : min time needed for each sensor to detect and transmit data

  16. QoSv-Guaranteed Sensor Scheduling • Average Detection Time for Constant Vehicle Speed • Approximate Average Detection Time (ADT) • Average Detection Time for Bounded Vehicle Speed

  17. Determination of Scheduling Parameters • Scheduling (under sensing error) Parameters are • Sensor Network Length (l) • Working Time (w) • Sleeping Time (s) where m: the number of scanning per working period Psuccess: the success probability of one scanning

  18. Sensor Scheduling for Complex Roads (1) • Road Network between the Inner and Outer Boundaries

  19. Sensor Scheduling for Complex Roads (2) • A Connected Graph for an Exemplary Road Network • The Road Network is represented as a Connected Graph between the Inner and Outer Boundaries.

  20. Sensor Scheduling for Complex Roads (3) • Construction of Scheduling Plan in Road Network • Determine the starting points Si to satisfy the required QoSv through Search Algorithm.

  21. Sensor Scheduling for Complex Roads (4) • Scanning in Road Network • One scanning can be split into multiple scanning. • Multiple scanning can be merged into one scanning for sensing energy.

  22. Performance Evaluation • Metrics • Sensor Network Lifetime according to Working Time and Turn-on Energy • Average Detection Time according to Working Time and Road Segment Length (i.e., Sensor Network Length) • Required Average Scanning Number for Sensing Error Probability • Validation of Numerical Analysis • We validated our numerical analysis of our scheduling algorithm through simulation.

  23. Environment for numerical analysis • road segment’s width is 20m, length is 2000m • number of sensors is 100 • total sensing energy in each sensor is 3600J, can used continuously for 3600sec since sensing energy consumption rate is 1watts • working time per working period is in [0.1, 5] • turn-on energy consumption is {0,0.12,0.48,0.96}J • vehicle’s max speed is 150km/h

  24. Sensor Network Lifetime according to Working Time and Turn-on Energy

  25. Average Detection Time according to Working Time and Road Segment Length

  26. Required Average Scanning Number for Sensing Error Probability

  27. Conclusion • We proposed an Energy-Aware Scheduling Algorithm to satisfy the required QoSv in Linear Sensor Network. • QoSv is defined as the reciprocal value of Average Detection Time (ADT). • Our Algorithm can be used for • Surveillance for City’s Border Roads, and • Traffic Signal Control in Crossroads • Future Work • Enhance the scheduling scheme when the sensors are deployed randomly close to the roads • Extend the scheme to two-dimensional open field

More Related