1 / 33

Rolf Ent, DIS2004

Measurements of R and the Longitudinal and Transverse Structure Functions in the Nucleon Resonance Region and Quark-Hadron Duality. Rolf Ent, DIS2004. Formalism: R, 2xF 1 , F 2 , F L E94-110: L/T Separation at JLab Quark-Hadron Duality Or: Why does DIS care about the Resonance Region?

eupham
Download Presentation

Rolf Ent, DIS2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Measurements of R and the Longitudinal and Transverse Structure Functions in the Nucleon Resonance Region and Quark-Hadron Duality Rolf Ent, DIS2004 • Formalism: R, 2xF1, F2, FL • E94-110: L/T Separation at JLab • Quark-Hadron Duality • Or: Why does DIS care about the Resonance Region? • If time left: Duality in nuclei/g1 • Summary

  2. Inclusive e + p  e’ + X scattering Single Photon Exchange Resonance Elastic DIS Where Alternatively:

  3. Resonance Region L-Ts Needed For Extracting spin structure functions from spin asymmetries s/2 –s3/2 s1/2 –s3/2 A1 = = s1/2 + s3/2 2sT DA1 edR (for R small) _ ~ A1 F1(A1 – gA2) From measurements of F1 and A1 extract s1/2 and s3/2! (Get complete set of transverse helicity amplitudes) g1 = 1 + g2 F2(1 + eR) _ ~ 1 + R (Only insensitive to R if F2 in relevant (x,Q2) region was truly measured at e = 1)

  4. E94-110 Experiment performed at JLab-Hall C HMS SOS G0

  5. JLab-HALL C Shielded Detector Hut Superconducting Dipole Target Scattering Chamber HMS SOS Superconducting Quadrupoles Electron Beam

  6. Rosenbluth Separations Hall C E94-110: a global survey of longitudinal strength in the resonance region…... sL +sT sT = sLsT / (polarization of virtual photon)

  7. Rosenbluth Separations Hall C E94-110: a global survey of longitudinal strength in the resonance region…... • Spread of points about the linear fits is Gaussian with s ~ 1.6 % consistent with the estimated point-point experimental uncertainty (1.1-1.5%) • a systematic “tour de force”

  8. World's L/T Separated Resonance Data R = sL/sT < < R = sL/sT (All data for Q2 < 9 (GeV/c)2)

  9. World's L/T Separated Resonance Data R = sL/sT < Now able to study the Q2 dependence of individual resonance regions! Clear resonant behaviour can be observed! Use R to extract F2, F1, FL R = sL/sT (All data for Q2 < 9 (GeV/c)2)

  10. E94-110 Rosenbluth Extractions of R • Clear resonant behaviour is observed in R for the first time! → Resonance longitudinal component NON-ZERO. → Transition form factor extractions should be revisited. • Longitudinal peak in second resonance region at lower mass than S11(1535 MeV) → D13(1520 MeV) ? P11(1440 MeV)? • R is large at low Q high W (low x) → Was expected R → 0 as Q2 → 0 → R → 0 also not seen in recent SLAC DIS analysis (R1998)

  11. Kinematic Coverage of Experiment sR = (ds/G) = sT(W2,Q2) + esL(W2,Q2) 2 Methods employed for separating Structure Functions: • Rosenbluth-type separations where possible (some small kinematic evolution is needed) • Iteratively fit F2 and R over the entire kinematic range. Also perform cross checks with elastic and DIS (comparing with SLAC data)

  12. L-T Separated Structure Functions Good agreement between methods ( model available for use!) Very strong resonant behaviour in FL! Evidence of different resonances contributing in different channels?

  13. DualityintheF2StructureFunction First observed ~1970 by Bloom and Gilman at SLAC by comparing resonance production data with deep inelastic scattering data • Integrated F2 strength in Nucleon Resonance region equals strength under scaling curve. Integrated strength (over all w’) is called Bloom-Gilman integral Shortcomings: • Only a single scaling curve and no Q2 evolution (Theory inadequate in pre-QCD era) • No sL/sT separation  F2 data depend on assumption of R = sL/sT • Only moderate statistics F2 Q2 = 0.5 Q2 = 0.9 F2 Q2 = 1.7 Q2 = 2.4 w’ = 1+W2/Q2

  14. DualityintheF2StructureFunction First observed ~1970 by Bloom and Gilman at SLAC Now can truly obtain F2 structure function data, and compare with DIS fits or QCD calculations/fits (CTEQ/MRST) Use Bjorken x instead of Bloom-Gilman’s w’ • Bjorken Limit: Q2, n • Empirically, DIS region is where logarithmic scaling is observed: Q2 > 5 GeV2, W2 > 4 GeV2 • Duality: Averaged over W, logarithmic scalingobserved to work also for Q2 > 0.5 GeV2, W2 < 4 GeV2, resonance regime (note: x = Q2/(W2-M2+Q2) • JLab results: Works quantitatively to better than 10% at such low Q2

  15. Numerical Example: Resonance Region F2 w.r.t. Alekhin Scaling Curve (Q2 ~ 1.5 GeV2)

  16. Duality in FT and FL Structure Functions Duality works well for both FT and FL above Q2 ~ 1.5 (GeV/c)2

  17. Also good agreement with SLAC L/T Data Alekhin SLAC MRST (NNLO) + TM E94-110 MRST (NNLO)

  18. Hadronic Cross Sections averaged over appropriate energy range Shadrons Perturbative Quark-Gluon Theory Quark-Hadron Dualitycomplementarity between quark and hadron descriptions of observables At high enough energy: Squarks+gluons = Can useeitherset of complete basis states to describe physical phenomena But why also in limited local energy ranges?

  19. If one integrates over all resonant and non-resonant states, quark-hadron duality should be shown by any model. This is simply unitarity. However, quark-hadron duality works also, for Q2 > 0.5 (1.0) GeV2, to better than 10 (5) % for the F2 structure function in both the N-D region and the N-S11 region! (Obviously, duality does not hold on top of a peak! -- One needs an appropriate energy range) One resonance + non-resonant background Few resonances + non-resonant background Why does local quark-hadron duality work so well, at such low energies? ~ quark-hadron transition Confinement is local ….

  20. Quark-Hadron Duality – Theoretical Efforts One heavy quark, Relativistic HO N. Isgur et al : Nc ∞ qq infinitely narrow resonances qqq only resonances Q2 = 1 Q2 = 5 u Scaling occurs rapidly! • F. Close et al : SU(6) Quark Model • How many resonances does one need • to average over to obtain a complete • set of states to mimic a parton model? • 56 and 70 states o.k. for closure • Similar arguments for e.g. DVCS and semi-inclusive reactions • Distinction between Resonance and Scaling regions is spurious • Bloom-Gilman Duality must be invoked even in the Bjorken Scaling region  Bjorken Duality

  21. Duality ‘’easier” established in Nuclei EMC Effect Fe/D Resonance Region Only The nucleus does the averaging for you! (s Fe/s D) IS x (= x corrected for M  0) Nucleons have Fermi motion in a nucleus

  22. … but tougher in Spin Structure Functions Pick up effects of both N and D (the D is not negative enough….) CLAS EG1 CLAS: N-D transition region turns positive at Q2 = 1.5 (GeV/c)2 Elastic and N-D transition cause most of the higher twist effects g1p D

  23. … but tougher in Spin Structure Functions (cont.) SLAC E143: g1p and g1d data combined Hint of overall negative g1n even in resonance region at Q2 = 1.2 (GeV/c)2 Duality works better for neutron than proton? – Under investigation g1n

  24. Summary • Performed precision inclusive cross section measurements in the nucleon resonance region (~ 1.6% pt-pt uncertainties) • R exhibits resonance structure (first observation) • Significant longitudinal resonant component observed. • Prominent resonance enhancements in R and FL different from those in transverse and F2 • Quark-hadron duality is observed for ALL unpolarized structure functions. • Quarks and the associated Gluons (the Partons) are tightly bound in Hadrons due to Confinement. Still, they rely on camouflage as their best defense: • a limited number of confined states acts as if consisting of free quarks  • Quark-Hadron Duality, which is a non-trivial property of QCD, telling us • that contrary to naïve expectation quark-quark correlations tend to cancel • on average • Observation of surprising strength in the longitudinal channel at Low Q2 and x ~ 0.1

  25. QCD and the Operator-Product Expansion 1 0 • Moments of the Structure Function Mn(Q2) = dxxn-2F(x,Q2) If n = 2, this is the Bloom-Gilman duality integral! • Operator Product Expansion Mn(Q2) = (nM02/Q2)k-1Bnk(Q2) higher twistlogarithmic dependence • Duality is described in the Operator Product Expansion as higher twist effects being small or cancelingDeRujula, Georgi, Politzer (1977)  k=1

  26. Example: e+e- hadrons Textbook Example R = Only evidence of hadrons produced is narrow states oscillating around step function

  27. Preliminary: Still DR = 0.1 point-to-point (mainly due to bin centering assumptions to x = 0.1) E99118

  28. Model Iteration Procedure Starting model is used for input for radiative corrections and in bin-centering the data in θ σexpis extracted from the data Model is used to decompose σexp into F2exp and Rexp Q2 dependence of both F2 and R is fit for each W2 bin to get new model

  29. Example SF Iteration Measurements at different ε are inconsistent ⇒ started with wrong splitting of strength! Q2 Iteration results in shuffling of strength Consistent values of the separated structure functions for all ε ! Q2

  30. Point-to-Point Systematic Uncertainties for E94-110 Total point-to-point systematic uncertainty for E94-110 is 1.6%.

  31. Experimental Procedure and CS Extraction Cross Section Extraction • Acceptance correct e- yield bin-by-bin (δ, θ). • Correct yield for detector efficiency. • Subtract scaled dummy yield bin-by-bin, to remove e- background from cryogenic target aluminum walls. • Subtract charge-symmetric background from π0 decay via measuring e+ yields. • bin-centering correction. • radiative correction. Elastic peak not shown W2 (GeV2) At fixed Ebeam, θc, scan E’ from elastic to DIS. (dp/p =+/-8%, dθ =+/-32 mrad) Repeat for each Ebeam, θcto reach a range in ε for each W2, Q2.

  32. QCD and the Parton-Hadron Transition One parameter, LQCD, ~ Mass Scale or Inverse Distance Scale where as(Q) = infinity “Separates” Confinement and Perturbative Regions Mass and Radius of the Proton are (almost) completely governed by Constituent Quarks Q > L as(Q) large Hadrons Q < L as(Q) > 1 QCD213 MeV Asymptotically Free Quarks Q >> L as(Q) small L

  33. QCD and the Parton-Hadron Transition One parameter, LQCD, ~ Mass Scale or Inverse Distance Scale where as(Q) = infinity “Separates” Confinement and Perturbative Regions Mass and Radius of the Proton are (almost) completely governed by QCD213 MeV

More Related