1 / 17

MOSAiC M ultidisciplinary drifting O bservatory for the S tudy of A rct i c C limate

MOSAiC M ultidisciplinary drifting O bservatory for the S tudy of A rct i c C limate. Matthew Shupe – U. of Colorado Ola Persson – U. of Colorado Michael Tjernström – Stockholm U. Klaus Dethloff – Alfred Wegener Inst. And many others. Dukhovskoy et al. 2006. www.iarc.uaf.edu.

evadne
Download Presentation

MOSAiC M ultidisciplinary drifting O bservatory for the S tudy of A rct i c C limate

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MOSAiC Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate Matthew Shupe – U. of Colorado Ola Persson – U. of Colorado Michael Tjernström – Stockholm U. Klaus Dethloff – Alfred Wegener Inst. And many others

  2. Dukhovskoy et al. 2006 www.iarc.uaf.edu Francis et al. 2009

  3. Arctic in Transition • The central Arctic is changing dramatically, • characterized by major sea-ice decline & more younger ice. • Do we know why? and (importantly) how? Sept. 2007 nsidc.org Courtesy J. Stroeve

  4. Implications of Change • We lack a system- and process-level understanding of change, due to a lack of observations! • Potential emergence of new processes • Change can lead to critical tipping points, acceleration via feedbacks • Implications for regional and lower-latitude weather • Implications for resource development, commerce, ecosystem changes, communities noaa.gov Francis et al. 2009

  5. Critical Model Shortcomings Regional Climate Models evaluated against SHEBA radiative fluxes reveal major biases and spreads, especially under clouds. Such biases can have serious implications for sea-ice concentrations. ~ 0 W m-2 ~ 0 W m-2 ~-10 W m-2 ~-25 W m-2 Tjernström et al. 2008

  6. Critical Model Shortcomings Comparison of IPCC AR4 models of sea-surface salinity: Major differences suggest lack of consistency in important processes such as ocean mixing, dynamics, sea-ice processes, freshwater input, and/or others. Best estimate of actual field based on observations Holland et al. 2007

  7. The MOSAiC Plan Multi-year, coordinated, and comprehensive measurements, extending from the atmosphere through the sea-ice and into the ocean, are needed in the central Arctic Basin to provide a process-level understanding of the changing central Arctic climate system that will contribute towards improved modeling of Arctic climate and weather, and prediction of Arctic sea-ice concentrations.

  8. The MOSAiC Plan What: Deploy heavily instrumented, manned, ship-based, Arctic Ocean observatory for comprehensive, coordinated observations of the Arctic atmosphere, cryosphere, and ocean. Network of spatial measurements to provide context and variability (buoys, gliders, UAVs, aircraft, ships, satellites, ice stations). Coordinated modeling activities at many scales from process-study to regional climate models.

  9. The MOSAiC Plan • When: Start 2017-2018, covering multiple annual cycles if possible • Where: Central Arctic Basin ice pack • Who: • Coordinated through IASC • International participation (e.g. US, Germany, Sweden, France, Russia, Finland, Norway, Canada, Korea, Japan, China,….) • International infrastructure • Synchronized international funding September 2011 sea ice extent (courtesy NSIDC). Numerous drift tracks of stations suggest possible observatory tracks

  10. MOSAiC Science Questions “What are the causes and consequences of an evolving and diminished Arctic sea ice cover?” • Thematic Sub-questions • How do ongoing changes in the Arctic ice-ocean-atmosphere system drive heat and mass transfers of importance to climate and ecosystems? • What are the processes and feedbacks affecting sea-ice cover, atmosphere-ocean stratification and energy budgets in the Arctic? • Will an ice-reduced Arctic become more biologically productive and what are the consequences of this to other components of the system? • How do interfacial exchange rates, biology and chemistry couple to regulate the major elemental cycles? • How do the different scales of spatial and temporal heterogeneity within the atmosphere, ice and ocean interact to impact the linkages or feedbacks within the system?

  11. Process Perspective • Process-study vs. climatology • Process is better suited to parameterization evaluation and development • Requires complex measurements to characterize interdependent processes • Distributed measurements for spatial variability & context on key parameters

  12. Measurements atmospheric profiling, BL, & dynamics gases, aerosols, clouds & precip. aircraft + UASs ocean and ice bio/chem surface energy budget buoys, AUVs, gliders Micro- meteorology ice profiling, thermodynamics, mass budgets ocean state, profiling, & dynamics leads & ocean surface

  13. Planning the Drift Track • Transpolar Drift track • Objectives: • Observe full sea-ice “life cycle,” starting in new ice. • Trajectory that will last for at least (more than) 1 year • Observe an understudied region • Will this be possible? 2011

  14. Full Annual Cycle Perovich et al. 2008 Persson et al. 2002 • Arctic climate system has memory. Sea-ice integrates energy budgets. • Processes vary over the annual cycle. • Important to understand all phases of the sea-ice life cycle: Formation > growth > transport/deformation > melt/decay/export • Past observations biased towards summer (warm, easy); • Relatively little understanding of winter processes.

  15. Building off the Past • Previous experiences within the Arctic ice pack: • Russian drifting stations • SHEBA • Shorter-term campaigns • Many disciplinary obs. • Some inter-disciplinary obs. • Each of these has key limitations: • Length of time • Comprehensiveness • Spatial context • Not in the “new” Arctic Russian drifting station SHEBA

  16. Central Model Role • Models play critical roles: • Identify important measurements, processes • Guide drift track • Integrate process information • Provide spatial context • Linkage w/ lower latitudes • Model considerations: • Hierarchy of model activities: process, regional, global • Regional model intercomparison project • Model “testbed” > Critical data for parameterization eval & development • Strong ties with WWRP Year of Polar Prediction (YOPP)

  17. MOSAiC into the Future • Tentative MOSAiC Schedule • Develop Science Plan – winter>spring 2013 • Implementation Workshop and Plan – fall 2013 • MOSAiC Open Science Meeting – likely 2014 • Start serious funding discussions: 2013> • Logistics planning 2013> • Preparatory modeling & instrument development 2013> • Field deployment October 2017?, 2018? Please get involved! www.mosaicobservatory.org

More Related