1 / 60

TOF Electronics Overview

TOF Electronics Overview. J. Schambach University of Texas STAR Review, BNL, 26 Jan 2006. Outline. Electronics “Essential Model” Current (Run 5 & 6) System Status Requirements & Performance Low Voltage System Production & Testing Crosstalk, Cosmics Testing Electronics Installation.

eve
Download Presentation

TOF Electronics Overview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TOF Electronics Overview J. Schambach University of Texas STAR Review, BNL, 26 Jan 2006

  2. Outline • Electronics “Essential Model” • Current (Run 5 & 6) System Status • Requirements & Performance • Low Voltage System • Production & Testing • Crosstalk, Cosmics Testing • Electronics Installation

  3. TOF Electronics Top Level

  4. Electronics for One Side

  5. Tray Level Electronics

  6. Front-End Electronics “TINO” 8 per tray 960 total

  7. ALICE NINO Chip

  8. MRPC Digitizer “TDIG” 8 per tray 3 per start side 966 total

  9. LSB MSB Coarse time(bin width 25 ns, 11 bits) PLL bits (bin width 3.125 ns) DLL bits (bin width 98 ps) R-C bits (bin width 24.4 ps) HPTDC Time Measurement HPTDC is fed by a 40 MHz clock giving us a basic 25 ns period (coarse count). A PLL (Phase Locked Loop) deviceinside the chip does clock multiplication by a factor 8 (3 bits) to 320 MHz (3.125 ns period) . ADLL (Delay Locked Loop) done by 32 cells fed by the PLL clock acts as a 5 bit hit register for each PLL clock (98 ps width LSB = 3.125 ns/32). 4R-C delay lines divide each DLL bin in 4 parts (R-C interpolation)

  10. HPTDC Buffering & Readout 8 channel @ 25ps or 32 channels @ 100ps Level-0 Trigger Bunch Crossing Hit Buffer Level-0 Buffering

  11. INL Correction • Sigma = 0.9 timebins = 22 ps • Implies single channel resolution of 16ps

  12. Tray Controller “TCPU” 1 per tray 1 per Start Detector 122 total

  13. DAQ/Trigger Interface “THUB” 2 per Detector side 4 total

  14. THUB Design

  15. Source Interface Unit Destination Interface Unit ALICE DDL Link Front-end electronics DDL SIU Detector Data Link Optical Fibre ~200 meters DDL DIU Read Out Receiver Card RORC PC Data Acquisition PC

  16. PMT Input Board “TPMT” 3 per Start Detector 6 total

  17. Interface to L0 trigger • Provides multiplicity at 9.4 MHz with <~700 ns latency. • The multiplicity range is 0-24 for each tray, where a bit is added to the sum if any of the 8 TOF channels in a NINO chip is above threshold. • The multiplicity sum is formed asynchronously and sent to L0 where it is gated and readout by the DSMI. • The RHIC clock is not used anywhere by the TOF electronics (other than to strobe in trigger commands).

  18. Interface to L2 trigger • TOF will provide a 23K bit map of the TOF hits to L2 for each “L0 accept” command • STAR L2 Trigger could use the CERN/ALICE DDL link that will also be the fiber interface between all STAR detector subsystems and DAQ in the upgraded STAR detector to receive L2 trigger data from detector subsystems. • Alternatively, TOF could put the transmitter parts of the STP interface on THUB to provide these data. • STAR should consider the TOF-L2 connection as a model for the future connection of EMC and additional subsystems to L2

  19. Current System Status

  20. Essential Model

  21. Run 5/6 Setup

  22. Run 5/6 Setup

  23. Run 5/6 Setup

  24. Run 5/6 Setup

  25. Run 5/6 Setup

  26. Remaining Development Work • TINO to replace TAMP • TPMT with Discriminators • TDIG with 3 TDCs each measuring leading and trailing edge times • THUB • Level-0 Multiplicities • Level-2 bitmap (firmware only) • Level-2 event buffering

  27. TINO R&D • Motivation: Replace Maxim Amplifier & Comparator of TAMP with custom ASIC “NINO”: • Cost • Power (no negative supply & lower power) • Fully differential: better match to HPTDC • Pulse stretching: one TDC can measure both leading & trailing edge • Prototype designed and successfully built @ Rice • Automated TINO production has been achieved • Cosmic ray testing currently ongoing @ UT • Preliminary results: timing resolution similar to TAMP

  28. Rework of TDIG • Eliminate comparators • Eliminate negative voltage • Eliminate 1 TDC, other 3 TDCs measuring leading & trailing edges • Add Level-0 Multiplicity logic • Add power sequencing, solid reset on power-up • Add remote configuration of logic devices • Change interconnect cable size and layout • Adapt physical dimensions to new tray layout

  29. THUB R&D • Needed to concentrate data before sending to DAQ in order to reduce the number of DAQ-fiber interfaces • Prototype currently in design stage @ UT • TCPU-THUB interfaces as daughter cards to investigate different options: • I/F as (cheap) SERDES with (cheap) CAT-5/6 cables • Clock recovery from SERDES or separate (differential) Coax? • Lots of functionality already tested with current TCPU in Run 5

  30. Board Status

  31. Requirements & Performance

  32. Expected Performance

  33. DAQ Data Rates

  34. Interface to DAQ • The TOF system needs to be faster than the upgraded TPC so as not to introduce any additional dead time. The TOF information is only useful in a STAR event if the TPC is also readout in that event. • The system will handle L0 accept commands at >10 kHz. • The system will handle L2 accept commands at >2 kHz • A design issue with some expense consequence is the required size of the pre-L2 buffer. How many tokens will be allowed in the system for events with TPC/TOF readout? TOF is planning to allow for a 256-event buffer before L2. We could remove this feature and just send the events to DAQ at a maximum rate of ~10 kHz.

  35. Low Voltage Supplies

  36. Low Voltage Power Requirement of TOF FEEs. • Maximum 110 Watts/tray @ 4.8 Volts @ tray. • Low Noise: • Periodic and Random Distortion (PARD) < few mVRMS • Floating outputs. • Shielded power cables (optional). • Independent supplies/tray. • Regulation: Not critical (linear regulation on FEE cards). • Remotely controlled and monitored. • Safety: Interlocked and adhere to STAR/BNL safety. • Rack mounted • Relatively low cost. • Good efficiency.

  37. Tray Low Voltage System Configuration

  38. LV Electrical Connection Details crimp lug connector AMP 52042-1 P<110 watts

  39. LV power Supply Arrangement in the Full size Racks • Total power dissipated by each tray ~ 110 Watts • Total Power dissipated outside power supply [55 Watts dissipated in each transmission cable] (trays + cables) ~ 165 Watts • Total heat dissipation per output channel (assuming 83% efficiency) ~ 34 Watts • Total Heat Dissipation per power supply mainframe (12 outputs) ~ 408 Watts • Total heat dissipation per full rack (6 x PL508 or PL512) ~ 2.45 KW • Available cooling power/rack (3 heat exchangers) ~ 3.6 KW A full rack supplies power to 72 trays Max. input power per PL512 chasis: 3 KW (power factor 0.96; Vmax = 208 V; Imax=15 A) http://www.wiener-d.com/products/20/73.html

  40. Rack Location

  41. Details of Low Voltage Supply Connections Cable lengths vary: 80’ -100’

  42. Power Supply Noise Characteristics Load: 100 A @ 5 Volts

  43. Comparison of Noise Rates in TOF5:Linear Supply vs. Wiener PL508

  44. TOF System Resolution from Off-Line AnalaysisKepco Linear (red curve) vs. Wiener (blue curve)(March 2005 Cu-Cu)

  45. Slow Control for the TOF Low Voltage System Ethernet This figure shows tray power supplies only. There is an additional power supply mainframe for the Start detector FEEs and TDIG boards (and a few spares).

  46. Production & Testing

  47. Electronics Testing • Bare board testing and simple stuffed board testing at Vendor • Simple single board functionality testing • Test board set of 8 TINO, 8 TDIG, and TCPU (all tray electronics) as a set on a dummy tray • Test installed electronics on a tray in a cosmic ray setup

  48. Electronics Test Plans

  49. TDIG Test Setup

  50. Proposed Acceptance Tests • Proposed elements in TDIG acceptance test: • Data input on all 24 channels from TINO • Cable delay test with generic calibration • Operation with TCPU (ext clk, trigger pulse, data xfer) • Operation with CAN bus • Power usage under specified conditions • Proposed elements in TCPU acceptance test: • Power usage under specified conditions • Data transfer from TDIG: • TDC data • Multiplicity data • Clock, trigger to TDIG • CAN bus • To host PC • Data relay from TDIG • Multiplicity output to trigger according to a specified data format • master/slave clocking

More Related