1 / 7

Centre of Public Scrutiny 2012 Awards – Transforming Services

Centre of Public Scrutiny 2012 Awards – Transforming Services. Gillian Blenkinsop Corporate Development and Policy Manager. What we did?. Reviewed the plans for future service delivery at Bassetlaw Hospital

Download Presentation

Centre of Public Scrutiny 2012 Awards – Transforming Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Centre of Public Scrutiny 2012 Awards – Transforming Services Gillian Blenkinsop Corporate Development and Policy Manager

  2. What we did? • Reviewed the plans for future service delivery at Bassetlaw Hospital • Carried out the review at a time of intense public and political interest in the Hospital’s future • Worked in a new way for scrutiny • holding extra-ordinary meetings of our Overview and Scrutiny Committee to hear evidence from senior managers and clinicians • working in closed session with our health select panel • working with a co-opted health clinician

  3. Some of the challenges? • Knowledge base • Ensuring an impartial, informed and evidenced based approach – keeping the politics out of the review • Nervousness of health partners • Technical nature of the review • Understanding and managing the information • Dealing with scrutiny in a two-tier area • Ensuring there was an end product

  4. What did we achieve? • More clarity in communications with the wider community from Bassetlaw Hospital • More pro-active marketing of hospital services • Cultural change amongst health service professionals in recognising the value of democratic challenge • More focus on planning the patient experience • A commitment to more effective communication and dialogue with the local community over current and future plans for service changes

  5. What did we achieve? • Improved relationships with the health sector • A commitment to hold an Annual Health Summit to review the key structural changes in health and changes in commissioning arrangements in 2013 • Members were actively engaged in re-shaping part of the maternity service • Members were significantly up-skilled – in their questioning skills, their knowledge of health service commissioning and service delivery

  6. What happens next? • We face the same challenges as everyone else in terms of “selling” the benefits of scrutiny • The external recognition was positive • Now we have got to review what we do and how we do it • There is a case for more external scrutiny • But equally a focus on issues that are taking priority internally may secure a more sustainable future for scrutiny

  7. Are there any transferable lessons? • It is all about building relationships • Internally – • getting “buy-in” for external scrutiny - from Members and officers • Externally – establishing a credible process and a relationship that works – co-operation counts

More Related