1 / 27

Earnings at Risk: A Unified Approach

Earnings at Risk: A Unified Approach. April 27, 2004 Jay Glacy Andres Vilms. VaR: A Refresher. A monthly VAR of $10 million means that there is a 5% chance of “loss” in excess of $10 million. VaR =  - 1.65  A fair-value metric

fathi
Download Presentation

Earnings at Risk: A Unified Approach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Earnings at Risk: A Unified Approach April 27, 2004 Jay Glacy Andres Vilms

  2. VaR: A Refresher • A monthly VAR of $10 million means that there is a 5% chance of “loss” in excess of $10 million. • VaR =  - 1.65 • A fair-value metric • Of limited usefulness and determinability for life insurers

  3. Braving the Complexity Tsunami • “Alphabet soup” • C-3a, SarbOx, OCI, 99-20, FAS 133, et al • Can we strengthen the actionability of management information? • Can we move decisioning away from subjective rules of thumb to a rigorous framework enabling optimality?

  4. Shortcomings of Duration • A fair-value, not accounting-based, quantity • Duration is a termination or wind-up value • Neglects important elements • Forward flows (renewal premiums, new issues) • Effects of reinvestment • Ignores distribution of value • Need a different metric for other risk factors • A trillion ways to create a portfolio of D = 5

  5. Why Earnings at Risk? • GAAP results explain 96% of the share price movements of life insurers. • CFOs crave smooth, predictable and rising earnings. • A direct connection to share price through analysts’ DDM valuations. • Low turnover requires understanding of how assets accommodate liabilities over time.

  6. The Earnings at Risk Framework • A concise measure of downside risk • Builds on existing ALM and CFT platforms • Expresses results in accounting terms • Captures all financial risks simultaneously • Contrasts relative exposures to various risks

  7. Key Functionality • Robust economic scenario generation • Interest rate • Equity market • Credit • Mortality • Policyholder behavior • Robust GAAP functionality • EITF 99-20: income and impairment rules • FAS 91: MBS amortization • FAS 97: dynamic DAC management

  8. Nested Scenarios • Two types of scenarios • Projection scenarios -- projections of future outcomes • Valuation scenarios -- for derivation of point-in-time values consistent with market conditions or regulatory requirements Valuation Projection

  9. Evolution of 10-Year Treasury Rates Year

  10. Emergence of GAAP Earnings To EaR Year

  11. Cross-Section of Year 3 GAAP Net Income Mean 10th %

  12. Implementation

  13. Calculation of EaR • EaR is a statistic of a joint probability distribution -- the convolution of the probability distributions of individual risks • If distributions are simple enough, closed-form solution may be available -- e.g. “mean-variance” VaR approach used by banks • However, financial risk of insurers is too complex

  14. Causes of Complexity Financial risk of insurers reflects capital market outcomes as filtered through • Asset/liability interaction • Market-sensitive behavior • Accounting and regulatory rules • Multiple periods  Monte Carlo simulation is necessary

  15. Calculation of Insurer EaR (by Monte Carlo simulation) • Need stochastic projection-type scenarios that • Include all relevant risk factors (capital market and other) • Extend over all modeling intervals • Financial results are projected for each scenario • EaR is observed from cumulative probability distribution of the resulting earnings outcomes • Correlation effect = Multi-factor EaR  Single-factor EaR

  16. Capital Market Scenarios • Scenarios should reflect company’s capital market forecast • History is richest source of data, considering • Length of observation period • Current market conditions • Risk-neutral basis is not appropriate for EaR analysis

  17. Scenario Reduction Methods • Screening of random deviates for conformity to standard normal • Quasi-random sequences • Linear path space • More dependent on the mathematical structure of a particular problem

  18. Modeling Interest Rates • Models of yield curve points (“key rates”) • Lognormal with forward drift • Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (incorporates mean reversion and volatility scaled by level of rates) • Principal components analysis -- statistical analysis identifies model factors that drive movement of entire yield curve • Can use “stylized facts” as criteria for reasonableness of modeled scenarios

  19. Modeling Equity Returns • Lognormal model • Regime-switching lognormal • GARCH model of stochastic volatility • Equity style analysis

  20. Modeling Credit Risk • More recent subject of research • Low frequency/high severity  difficult to fit a credible distribution • Definitional complications • Investment perspective is concerned mainly with market value changes • Realized credit losses are a function of both default incidence and recovery

  21. Modeling Insurance Risks • Conceptually simple -- specify probability distribution and correlations with other risk factors • Little established use in life insurance industry • Mortality is best candidate • Reasonably well understood • Large volume of data -- good statistical credibility • Correlation with other risks probably immaterial

  22. Application

  23. Applications Enabled • Strategic asset allocation • Strategic line-of-business decisioning • Inforce management strategizing • Dynamic liability repricing • Reinvestment/financing • Risk management exercises • Financial management exercises • Financial statement sculpting

  24. EaR for Risk Management • Track EaR over time to highlight material changes in risk exposure (“early warning” system) • Compare EaR across lines of business to prioritize risks for mitigation • Compare EaR across risk factors to understand company’s overall risk profile • Compare correlation effects across lines of business and across risk factors, to identify natural hedges

  25. EaR for Financial Management • EaR can serve as a measure of economic capital • Compare EaR to regulatory capital to evaluate profit potential of different lines of business • EaR << regulatory capital  regulatory requirements create drag on profit • EaR >> regulatory capital  potential for outsize profits, but higher likelihood of ruin • Use EaR as basis for risk charge for performance measurement • Implicit assumption is that EaR (as specified) is a measure of market-compensated risk

  26. Applying Optimization • Optimization Decision Variables • Model time 0 • Asset allocation • Business line mix • Derivatives (caps, floors) overlay • Model time 1+ • Reinvestment/financing strategy • Renewal crediting strategy • New business generation algorithm

  27. Optimization in Action By Changing Minimize

More Related