1 / 20

IN DEFENSE: XILING SUN & ARINDAM PAUL

Behavioral Targeting in on-line advertising: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY AUTHORS: Joanna JAWORSKA MARCIN SYDOW. IN DEFENSE: XILING SUN & ARINDAM PAUL. INTRODUCTION. Internet Economy is driven by Advertising Search-based Ads(40%) Display Ads (22%) Classifieds (17%)

fauna
Download Presentation

IN DEFENSE: XILING SUN & ARINDAM PAUL

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Behavioral Targeting in on-line advertising: AN EMPIRICAL STUDYAUTHORS:Joanna JAWORSKAMARCIN SYDOW IN DEFENSE: XILING SUN & ARINDAM PAUL

  2. INTRODUCTION • Internet Economy is driven by Advertising • Search-based Ads(40%) • Display Ads (22%) • Classifieds (17%) • The revenue comes from whether user is to click on a ad or not • Depends on degree of match between ad and user' s context • This kind of matching is called “targeting” and forms a motivation for this paper

  3. BEHAVIORAL TARGETING • We need to automatically decide based on the statistics of the users' web browsing history • Behavioral Targeting has a great potential in improving the performance of ad system • Experiments in this paper do not constitute any serious threat on users' privacy • User represented by cookies

  4. The General Model • Each user is identified by a cookie and a set of attributes U • U: 13 different web page categories • Each visit of the web page will increase the corresponding category by 1 • The format of some rows of profile data:

  5. The General Model • A model that can be represented as function • fc(U) = p∈ [0, 1] • The potential relevance of the ad c presented to the user described by the profile U. • Decision whether to present the ad c to a user visiting the page • fc(U) > θc, for some threshold θc which can be tuned experimentally. • Current model is simple. Only a single ad is considered at a time • CTR (click-through rate) is used to evaluate performance • higher CTR of the presented ad, the higher revenue of the ad-serving system

  6. Design of Experiments • data comes from real impressions of ads • different data processing

  7. Design of Experiments • different Machine-Learning algorithms • different evaluation metrics

  8. Design of Experiments • Recall and Precision • Consider an example information request I (of a test reference collection) and its set R of relevant documents. • Let A be the answer set generated by retrieval strategy. • Let |Ra| be the number of documents in the intersection of the sets R and A • Recall is the fraction of the relevant documents (the set R) which has been retrieved, i.e. Recall = |Ra| / |R| • Precision is the fraction of the retrieved documents (the set A) which is relevant, i.e. Precision = |Ra| / |A|

  9. Experimental Results • Comparison of Various Algorithms and Attribute Transformations

  10. Experimental Results • The Choice of the Training Sample • 10%all − 1 − smp0 • 10%all • 20%all

  11. Experimental Results • Observations • it is hard to find any clear relationship between the classification algorithm or data preprocessing technique applied and the performance. • the applied model of adaptive behavioral targeting seems to be generally successful • Different training set did not influence result

  12. Contributions • present an experimental framework for testing and evaluating various factors • propose a general adaptive behavioral targeting model which is generally successful in practice • a preliminary comparison between a couple of classification algorithms and attribute-preprocessing techniques is made and reported • the evaluation is made on unique, large industrial datasets, the first reported evaluations made on real datasets

  13. Conclusions • although a very simple model, this model is nonetheless successful • It generally increase the precision value (hit rate). • no clear conclusion about which algorithms are better • this is the initial work at this area • decide whether to present a single ad • an obvious simplification of the real situation • plan to extend the model to take into account multiple as candidates • this work provides clear directions which all have formed foundations for future work

  14. Further Work • introduce temporal dimension • additional category-based attributes specifying the times spent on each of the categories (work-days and week-days) • introduce 2-fold profile : long & short term • clustering users or advertising • different (larger and balanced) training set • extend the model such that it endlessly adapts to the users and their behavior

  15. Impact on future research • This is kind of a seminal work in the area of Behavioral Targeting in Advertising. • It has motivated many future works in this direction • Tomarchio et al.'s work on developing data-driven behavioral algorithms for online ads is directly inspired from this work. • Trzcinski et al. also took cue from this paper on their work on analyzing privacy in mobile ads. • Wang et al.'s work on“Understanding Network and User-Targeting Properties of Web Advertising Networks”is also inspired from this work.

  16. Thank you

More Related