1 / 22

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Debate

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Debate. Dr. Sajid Khan Visiting Scholar in Marketing Manchester Metropolitan Business School Manchester; Associate Professor of Marketing School of Business and Management The American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE www.aus.edu Email: mskhan@aus.edu.

fergus
Download Presentation

Qualitative vs. Quantitative Debate

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Qualitative vs. Quantitative Debate Dr. Sajid Khan Visiting Scholar in Marketing Manchester Metropolitan Business School Manchester; Associate Professor of Marketing School of Business and Management The American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE www.aus.edu Email: mskhan@aus.edu

  2. Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  3. Qualitative vs. Quantitative(methods-level terms) • What is research? • in revealing differences between qualitative and quantitative approaches we need to look at the paradigms • Which approach should I use? • Choice of approach is dependent on research objectives Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  4. The Nature of Scientific Theory • ‘theories are systematically related sets of statements, including some law-like generalizations, that are empirically testable. The purpose of theory is to increase scientific understanding through a systematized structure capable of both explaining and predicting phenomena’ (Hunt 1993:10) Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  5. Approaches: Objective and Subjective • Objective: is predicated on explaining and predicting phenomena • Subjective: describing and understanding phenomena • In early years of marketing – objective • Last two decades - both approaches Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  6. Alternative Paradigms of Marketing ‘paradigm is an overall conceptual framework within which a researcher may work…a basic belief system or worldview that guides the researcher’ (Guba and Lincoln 1994) • Decided through • The ontological question: nature of reality? • The epistemological question: relationship between knower and known? • The methodological question: how to find out knowledge? Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  7. Basic belief system of alternative paradigms: Positivism • Natural & social sciences measure independent facts • Putting theory into practise  • Deductive approach Theory; Hypothesis Tested through data collection Verified / Falsified  • Example - quantitative study An examination of the impact of music within television advertisements on consumer behaviour Theory: classical conditioning framework • H1: that the more salient the role music has in the ad, the more affect-based the ad is likely to be • Research Design: Experiment with questionnaire • Analysis: Basic statistics aimed to verify the hypothesis • Goal: how it truly works (Guba)? Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  8. Basic belief system of alternative paradigms: Critical Realism (post-positivism) • Real world to discover, but cannot be fully apprehended • Imperfect sensory and intellective mechanisms • Perception for realists is a “window on to” reality – several perceptions though of that reality may be triangulated to obtain a better picture Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  9. Basic belief system of alternative paradigms: Critical Theory • Aim at critique and transform social, political, cultural, and economic, ethnic and gender values • Inquiries: long-term ethnographic and historical studies of organisational processes • Assumptions: subjective, values mediate inquiry • Knowledge: value-dependent and not value-free (Guba and Lincoln 1994) • Methodology: dialogic, transformative Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  10. Basic belief system of alternative paradigms: Constructivism • Truth is a construction which refers to a particular belief held in a particular context, my own construction (Guba) • Realities appear as multiple realities - relativist • Socially and experientially based • Findings are the creation of the process of interaction between the inquirer and inquired • Suitable for some social science research (religion, beauty or prejudice) rarely appropriate for business research (Hunt 1991) • Dialectic, hermeneutic Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  11. Criticisms  • Positivism & quantitative methods • objective reality, but ultimate objectivity is not possible (post-postivisim) • issues of context • adequacy of scientific method  • Interpretative & qualitative methods • too subjective • inability to generalise Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  12. Two statements(Hughes 2002) • Quantitative research is confirmatory, outcome-oriented, deductive in nature Qualitative research is exploratory and inductive in nature • Are these two statements correct? • Quantitative-Qualitative debate is philosophical, not methodological • The context Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  13. Key Characteristics • Qualitative • Researcher immersing in the setting • Contexts natural – nothing is predefined • Interactive process • Experiential – understand experience as unified • No one general method • Quantitative • Control • Operational definition • Replication • Hypothesis testing Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  14. Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Research • Qual facilitates Quant • Quant facilitates Qual • Triangulation (Miles and Hubermans 1994) • Problem of generality • Researcher-subject perspective • Stages in the research process • Structure (quantitative) and process (qualitative) • Each approach has drawbacks Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  15. Impact of Downsizing on Customers • Largely ignored in the literature • Negative impacts on employees are also likely to have far-reaching effects on customers • Especially on front-line and boundary spanning roles of service delivery • Emotional contagion from transfer of attitudes, and service climate • Bassi and Van Buren 1997, Lam and Reshef 1999, Dietz et al 2001, Johnson, Herman and Huber 2006) • Reduced levels of:- • Customer service • Trust and commitment • Relationship quality • Broken bonds • Satisfaction • Repeat purchase • Positive word of mouth Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  16. Research Objective • This study aimed to examine the impact of downsizing on customer perceptions of the factors influencing customer satisfaction and repurchase intentions in a B2B service environment. Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  17. Context of the Study • Fortune 100 company • SBU - Building services (one of the Big 5) • B2B services market (Big 5 = 60% mkt share) • Driven by annual contracts for building maintenance services – usually large accounts • Large initial capital investment • Over 80000 contracts, over $5 billion • 35000 service technicians in the US • 2001-2 recession, revenue flat, goal cost reduction • During 2002, firm layed off 15% of service technicians (approx 5000 staff) Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  18. Research Methods • The firm had employed an independent market research company to collect customer feedback on its services for 5 years prior to the study. • Longitudinal study – 5 quarters • before downsizing (Q4-01; Q1-02) • after downsizing (Q2-02, Q2-03, Q2-04) • A random sample of customers were surveyed each month – data was aggregated quarterly • Sample size varied between 534 to 994 respondents quarterly – samples independent • Telephone interview with key-contact personnel who were “primary decision makers” at each firm • 65 questions initially from qualitative research, refined and modified over a 5 year period to 31 questions used for the study • 5 point categorical scales Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  19. A Priori Model Repurchase Intentions Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  20. Main Constructs • Technician service • 5 items (4 after CFA) • Account representatives • 5 items (4 after CFA) • Dispatch services • 3 items (3 after CFA) • Emergency services • 5 items (3 after CFA) • Satisfaction • 3 items indexed • Repurchase intentions • 2 items indexed Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  21. Some important questions! • Is quantitative approach more important than the qualitative, or vice versa? • Are underlying assumptions different? • Does research tradition matter? • Does researcher’s own experience and preference matter? • Can both qualitative and quantitative approaches be used in conjunction with each other? Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

  22. Which approach to choose? (Punch 1998) • Research question and overall research objectives • Standardized vs. situation in detail? What is your interest? • The literature • Implications • Style Qualitative vs. Quanitative Debate

More Related