1 / 23

FILTRO SISMICO

Aislador de temblores para edificaciones

filtrosismico
Download Presentation

FILTRO SISMICO

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tel. 01152 (646) 155 4114 cel 01152 (664) 628 3838

  2. Video: Haga clic dos veces dentro del cuadro para iniciarlo Deformaciones Estructurales Provocados Por Un Sismo

  3. Hospital Juárez CUANDO NO SE RESISTEN LAS DEFORMACIONES, ESTO SUCEDE

  4. Northridge 94 TAMBIENESTO

  5. Northridge ! Y ESTO TAMBIEN !

  6. 3 Métodos para atacar el problema de temblores Traditional method shock absorvers isolation Fixed to the ground Fixed to the ground ground free less No deformation Deformation deformation With no protection With dampers With Seismic Filters

  7. rigid frame Strong wall Sliding plate Accelerometer Load cell Shake table TESTS CARRIED OUT AT POWEL SEISMIC LAB UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IN SAN DIEGO (UCSD)

  8. Table 2. Test Sequence. Table 2. Test Sequence. Test Name Test Type Excitation SF-B1 1400 psi Benchmark Sinusoidal Displacement, 10 cycles, 0.5 Hz, +-1 in SF-F1 Frequency Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.05 Hz, +-1 in Confining Pressure SF-F2 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.05 Hz, +-3 in SF-F3 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.05 Hz, +-5 in SF-F4 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.5 Hz, +-1 in SF-F5 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.5 Hz, +-3 in SF-F6 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.5 Hz, +-5 in SF-F7 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 1.0 Hz, +-1 in SF-F8 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 1.0 Hz, +-3 in SF-F9 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 1.0 Hz, +-5 in SF-F10 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 2.0 Hz, +-1 in SF-F11 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 2.0 Hz, +-3 in SF-S1 Seismic Tarzana, Full Scale or Table Stroke Limit SF-S2 Tarzana, Full Scale or Table Stroke Limit SF-S3 Mexico City, Table Stroke Limit SF-S4 Mexico City, Table Stroke Limit SF-S5 Saguenay, PHA = 2.1 g SF-S6 Saguenay, PHA = 2.1 g SF-B2 3500 psi Benchmark Sinusoidal Displacement, 10 cycles, 0.5 Hz, +-1 in SF-F12 Frequency Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.05 Hz, +-1 in SF-F13 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.05 Hz, +-3 in SF-F14 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.05 Hz, +-5 in SF-F15 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.5 Hz, +-1 in SF-F16 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.5 Hz, +-3 in SF-F17 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.5 Hz, +-5 in SF-F18 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 1.0 Hz, +-1 in SF-F19 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 1.0 Hz, +-3 in SF-F20 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 1.0 Hz, +-5 in SF-F21 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 2.0 Hz, +-1 in SF-F22 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 2.0 Hz, +-3 in SF-S7 Seismic Tarzana, Full Scale or Table Stroke Limit SF-S8 Tarzana, Full Scale or Table Stroke Limit SF-S9 Mexico City, Table Stroke Limit SF-S10 Mexico City, Table Stroke Limit SF-S11 Saguenay, PHA = 2.1 g SF-S12 Saguenay, PHA = 2.1 g SF-B3 6000 psi Benchmark Sinusoidal Displacement, 10 cycles, 0.5 Hz, +-1 in SF-F23 Frequency Frequency Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.05 Hz, +-1 in SF-F24 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.05 Hz, +-3 in SF-F25 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.05 Hz, +-5 in SF-F26 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.5 Hz, +-1 in SF-F27 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.5 Hz, +-3 in SF-F28 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 0.5 Hz, +-5 in SF-F29 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 1.0 Hz, +-1 in SF-F30 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 1.0 Hz, +-3 in SF-F31 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 1.0 Hz, +-5 in SF-F32 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 2.0 Hz, +-1 in SF-F33 Sinusoidal Displacement, 3 cycles, 2.0 Hz, +-3 in SF-S13 Seismic Tarzana, Full Scale or Table Stroke Limit SF-S14 Tarzana, Full Scale or Table Stroke Limit SF-S15 Mexico City, Table Stroke Limit SF-S16 Mexico City, Table Stroke Limit SF-S17 Saguenay, PHA = 2.1 g SF-S18 Saguenay, PHA = 2.1 g Presion=98.5 Kgm/cm2 Carga=64 t Presion=246 Kgm/cm2 Carga=157 t Presion=422 Kgm/cm2 Carga=275 t Programa de Pruebas basado en “Testing of Seismic Isolation and Energy Dissipating Devices”

  9. Video: haga clic dos veces con el cursor dentro de la presentación Open the moive 14 SECS. OF PEAK ACCELERATIONS OF NORTHRIDGE’94 (click twice to start) 14 segundos de aceleración máxima de la simulación del temblor Northridge’94

  10. = 98.5 k/cm2 = 246 k/cm2 = 422 k/cm2 = 98.5 k/cm2 = 246 k/cm2 = 422 k/cm2 Figure 5. Variation of Static and Kinematic Coefficients of Friction with Exciting Frequency as Measured in the Frequency Dependency Tests. Las pruebas demuestran que los coeficientes de fricción son independientes de las frecuencias, solo de las cargas.

  11. El trazo rojo corresponde a las aceleraciones del terreno, el verde a las transmitidas por el Filtro Sismico El trazo verde en la grafica superior es difícil de apreciar, por lo que fué necesario magnificarlo

  12. El trazo rojo corresponde a las aceleraciones del terreno, el verde a las transmitidas por el Filtro Sismico El trazo verde en la grafica superior es imposible de apreciar, por lo que fué necesario magnificarlo

  13. STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS RESEARCH PROJECT Report No. TR–2001/08 by August 2001 Department of Structural Engineering University of California, San Diego La Jolla, California 92093-0085 DYNAMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF A SEISMIC FILTER Test Report submitted to Mr. Hector Valencia, 482 W. San Ysidro Blvd. PMB 545, San Ysidro, CA 92173. ANDRÉ FILIATRAULT KENNETH A. KENZEL CONSTANTIN CHRISTOPOULOS

  14. After 45 frequency tests plus 27 accumulated minutes during 18 earthquake simulations Dr. André Filiatrault concluded: “For the three confining pressures considered in the test, the behavior of the seismic filter is repeatable, stable and nearly identical in tension-compression. The hysteresis loops are nearly rectangular indicating a coulomb-type frictional response. The static coefficient of friction varied from 0.08 to 0.025. The kinematic coefficient friction varied from 0.003 to 0.013.” (En rojo el escrito textual de André Filiatrault PhD, actual Director de MCEER Multidisciplinary Center Engineering Research) Nota: Coulomb-type= tipo idealizado de respuesta de fricción

  15. PCI-NSF-PANKOW TESTSAT Technical support Jose Restrepo Ph.D. Professor and Director of Operations, Charles Lee Powell Structural Research LaboratoriesUCSD Carlos Huerta Ph.D. Research Scientist/ Professor, Seismology Department CICESE Fortunato Espinoza Ph.D.Research Scientist/ Professor School of Civil Engineering UABC

  16. Pruebas senoidales iniciales para calibrar equipo y sensores Video: haga clic dos veces con el cursor dentro de la presentación

  17. Video: haga clic dos veces con el cursor dentro de la presentación Prueba de simulación de terremoto que fueron intensificandose paulatinamente

  18. Proyecto de edificio multiusos aislado contra temblores presentado a la Universidad Autónoma de B.C (UABC). Diseño: Arq. Hector Valencia Aguilar

  19. A los edificios construidos se les puede aplicar Filtros Sísmicos sin desocuparlos

  20. Tanque de combustible aislado con Filtros Sismicos

  21. Mecanismo inferior de la mesa vibratoria con capacidad de 2,000 ton, 2da mas grande del mundo.

More Related