1 / 16

NCSX Project Review May 9, 2006 Cost and Schedule Overview Ron Strykowsky

NCSX Project Review May 9, 2006 Cost and Schedule Overview Ron Strykowsky. Performance to date Schedule Critical path tasks being met SPI = 0.96 VVSA (baselined delivery March 06; forecast August 06) 7.5 mo off critical path

fleur-hooper
Download Presentation

NCSX Project Review May 9, 2006 Cost and Schedule Overview Ron Strykowsky

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NCSX Project Review May 9, 2006 Cost and Schedule Overview Ron Strykowsky Project Review May 9, 2006

  2. Performance to date Schedule Critical path tasks being met SPI = 0.96 VVSA (baselined delivery March 06; forecast August 06) 7.5 mo off critical path TF Coil Fabrication- Revised plans. Contract recently awarded 6.5 mo off critical path Modular Coil Hardware design (drawings being prioritized and released for procurement) Cost CPI= 0.96 Modular coil winding operations (unplanned rework, fac. Mods, training, startup) Vac Vsl H/W design and fabrication (Heater tape, cooling tubes, supports, response to VVSA NCR’s) WBS 82 Systems engineering (integrated modeling and stress analysis, dimensional control) Change Control ECP-43 process this year (MCWF Contract mod) Project performing within budget and schedule Issues and risks being mitigated via monthly cost and schedule reviews with job managers and DOE Project Review May 9, 2006

  3. Current Financial Status (through 3/31/06) Plan forward on sound basis Project ETC exercise identified areas of cost growth and opportunities for reduction of non-CD-4 requirements Contingency updated to reflect future risk Forecast consistent with BA funding guidance Realistic plans in place to complete project First plasma July 2009 with 6 months float (5 mo. last review) Contingency balance at 21.6% (21.6% last review) Financial status and plan forward Project Review May 9, 2006

  4. Proposed Changes to Performance Measurement Baseline Project Review May 9, 2006

  5. Budget Reconciliation-(Variances) Project Review May 9, 2006

  6. Budget Reconciliation-(Stellarator Core) Project Review May 9, 2006

  7. Budget Reconciliation-(Ancillary Systems) Project Review May 9, 2006

  8. Risk & Opportunities • Above risks are covered by a line item contingency assessment • Project engineering, configuration control, system analysis and dimensional control coordination have the potential for additional resources to support the final assembly phase. Project Review May 9, 2006

  9. Contingency Analysis Contingency Supported by Updated Risk Assessment VVSA 80% complete MCWF 63% complete Project Review May 9, 2006

  10. Plan supports BA guidance Project being managed to maximize accomplishments this FY. Non-critical work scope available for deferral into FY07 if needed. FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 Project Review May 9, 2006

  11. NCSX Milestone Status Project Review May 9, 2006

  12. Sound Plan to Complete Project on Schedule • 2 shifts on 2 lines all modular coils and selected assembly operations • 6 months schedule float • Schedule contingency remaining; • 2 shift Field period assembly • 2 shift Final Machine assembly • Sat & Sundays Project Review May 9, 2006

  13. MCWF Deliveries Support Project Schedule New Contract Schedule New Project Schedule I Recent Deliveries Complete Field Period Sets #1 Nov. 2006 #2 Feb. 2007 #3 Aug. 2007 New Contract In Effect Note: 1 Field Period (F.P.) Set = 2 A’s, 2 B’s, and 2 C’s. • Project planning assumes a more conservative schedule than contract schedule. (Deliveries every 5 weeks vs. every 4 weeks.) Project Review May 9, 2006

  14. Critical Components have adequate schedule margin Critical Path (6 mos.) VVSA Free Float (7.5mo.) TF Coil Free Float (6.5 mos.) • Critical path through modular coils • VVSA and TF Coil well off critical path Refer to critical path plot for more detail Project Review May 9, 2006

  15. Staffing needs being met Daily task and personnel assignments for modular coil winding operations • Manpower plans in place for beginning of field period assy • Future technician levels equal to or less than previous estimates as a result of replanning Project Review May 9, 2006

  16. The project has met schedule and cost objectives to date. The project has sound plan going forward ETC’s, unrecoverable cost variances and risks recognized. Current schedule forecast (incl vendor updates and schedule ETC’s) is realistic and achievable Adequate schedule and budget contingency Manpower needs being met. Conclusion Project Review May 9, 2006

More Related