1 / 28

AXEL-2009 Introduction to Particle Accelerators

AXEL-2009 Introduction to Particle Accelerators. Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers. Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 22 January 2009. Force due to magnetic field gives change of direction.

flower
Download Presentation

AXEL-2009 Introduction to Particle Accelerators

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AXEL-2009Introduction to Particle Accelerators Synchrotron Radiation What is it ? Rate of energy loss Longitudinal damping Transverse damping Quantum fluctuations Wigglers Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 22 January 2009

  2. Force due to magnetic field gives change of direction Newton’s law Momentum change Direction changes but not magnitude • So: Acceleration and Electro-Magnetic Radiation • An accelerating charge emits Electro-Magnetic waves. • Example: An antenna is fed by an oscillating current and it emits electro magnetic waves. • In our accelerator we know to types of acceleration: • Longitudinal – RF system • Transverse – Magnetic fields, dipoles, quadrupoles, etc.. AXEL - 2009

  3. Rate of EM radiation • The rate at which a relativistic lepton radiates EM energy is : • Longitudinal square of energy (E2) • Transverse square of magnetic field (B2) Force // velocity Force  velocity PSR E2 B2 • In our accelerators: • Transverse force > Longitudinal force • Therefore we only consider radiation due to ‘transverse acceleration’ (thus magnetic forces) AXEL - 2009

  4. Electron radius Velocity of light Total energy ‘Accelerating’ force Lepton rest mass constant Rate of energy loss (1) • This EM radiation generates an energy loss of the particle concerned, which can be calculated using: • Our force can be written as: F = evB = ecB • Thus: but • Which gives us: AXEL - 2009

  5. Rate of energy loss (2) • We have: ,which gives the energy loss • We are interested in the energy loss per revolution for which we need to integrate the above over 1 turn • Thus: Bending radius inside the magnets Lepton energy • However: • Finally this gives: Gets very large if E is large !!! AXEL - 2009

  6. What about the synchrotron oscillations ? • The RF system, besides increasing the energy has to make up for this energy loss u. • All the particles with the same phase, , w.r.t. RF waveform will have the same energy gain E = Vsin • However, • Lower energy particles lose less energy per turn • Higher energy particles lose more energy per turn • What will happen…??? AXEL - 2009

  7. E t (or ) Synchrotron motion for leptons • All three particles will gain the same energy from the RF system • The black particle will lose more energy than the red one. • This leads to a reduction in the energy spread, since u varies with E4. AXEL - 2009

  8. Extra term for energy loss Longitudinal damping in numbers (1) • Remember how we calculated the synchrotron frequency. • It was based on the change in energy: • Now we have to add an extra term, the energy loss du • becomes • Our equation for the synchrotron oscillation becomes then: AXEL - 2009

  9. Longitudinal damping in numbers (2) • This term: • Can be written as: but • This now becomes: • The synchrotron oscillation differential equation becomes now: Damped SHM, as expected AXEL - 2009

  10. Longitudinal damping in numbers (3) • So, we have: • The damping coefficient • This confirms that the variation of u as a function of E leads to damping of the synchrotron oscillations as we already expected from our reasoning on the 3 particles in the longitudinal phase space. AXEL - 2009

  11. We know that and thus • So approximately: Energy Revolution time Damping time = Energy loss/turn Longitudinal damping time • The damping coefficient is given by: Not totally correct since r E • For the damping time we have then: • The damping time decreases rapidly (E3) as we increase the beam energy. AXEL - 2009

  12. DE DE f df Damping & Longitudinal emittance • Damping of the energy spread leads to shortening of the bunches and hence a reduction of the longitudinal emittance. Initial Later… AXEL - 2009

  13. Some LHC numbers • Energy loss per turn at: • injection at 450 GeV = 1.15 x 10-1 eV • Collision at 7 TeV = 6.71 x 103 eV • Power loss per meter in the main dipoles at 7 TeV is 0.2 W/m • Longitudinal damping time at: • Injection at 450 GeV = 48489.1 hours • Collision at 7 TeV = 13 hours AXEL - 2009

  14. Emitted photon (dp) total momentum (p) momentum lost dp ideal trajectory particle particle trajectory What about the betatron oscillations ? (1) • Each photon emission reduces the transverse and longitudinal energy or momentum. • Lets have a look in the vertical plane: AXEL - 2009

  15. ideal trajectory new particle trajectory old particle trajectory What about the betatron oscillations ? (2) • The RF system must make up for the loss in longitudinal energy dE or momentum dp. • However, the cavity only supplies energy parallel to ideal trajectory. • Each passage in the cavity increases only the longitudinal energy. • This leads to a direct reduction of the amplitude of the betatron oscillation. AXEL - 2009

  16. Vertical damping in numbers (1) • The RF system increases the momentum p by dp or energy E by dE Tan(α)= α If α << pT= total momentum pt = transverse momentum p= longitudinal momentum dp is small • The change in transverse angle is thus given by: AXEL - 2009

  17. by’  y a da Vertical damping in numbers (2) • A change in the transverse angle alters the betatron oscillation amplitude bdy’ Summing over many photon emissions AXEL - 2009

  18. Damping time = Vertical damping in numbers (3) dE is just the change in energy per turn u (energy given back by RF) • The change in amplitude/turn is thus: • We found: • Which is also: Change in amplitude/second • Thus: Revolution time • This shows exponential damping with coefficient: (similar to longitudinal case) AXEL - 2009

  19. OK since b=1 ais related to D(s) in the bending magnets Horizontal damping in numbers • Vertically we found: • This is still valid horizontally • However, in the horizontal plane, when a particle changes energy (dE) its horizontal position changes too • horizontally we get: Ok provided a small • Horizontal damping time: AXEL - 2009

  20. Some intermediate remarks…. • Transverse damping time at: • Injection at 450 GeV = 48489.1 hours • Collision at 7 TeV = 26 hours • Longitudinal and transverse emittances all shrink as a function of time. • Damping times are typically a few milliseconds up to a few seconds for leptons. • Advantages: • Reduction in losses • Injection oscillations are damped out • Allows easy accumulation • Instabilities are damped • Inconvenience: • Lepton machines need lots of RF power, therefore LEP was stopped • All damping is due to the energy gain from the RF system an not due to the emission of synchrotron radiation AXEL - 2009

  21. Is there a limit to this damping ? (1) • Can the bunch shrink to microscopic dimensions ? • No ! , Why not ? • For the horizontal emittance hthere is heating term due to the horizontal dispersion. • What would stop dE and v ofdamping to zero? • For vthere is no heating term. Sovcan get very small. Coupling with motion in the horizontal plane finally limits the vertical beam size AXEL - 2009

  22. Is there a limit to this damping ? (2) • In the vertical plane the damping seems to be limited. • What about the longitudinal plane ? • Whenever a photon is emitted the particle energy changes. • This leads to small changes in the synchrotron oscillations. • This is a random process. • Adding many such random changes (quantum fluctuations), causes the amplitude of the synchrotron oscillation to grow. • When growth rate = damping rate then damping stops, which give a finite equilibrium energy spread. AXEL - 2009

  23. Damping time  Revolution time • Number of photons emitted/turn = Energy loss/turn Quantum fluctuations (1) • Quantum fluctuation is defined as: • Fluctuation in number of photons emitted in one damping time • Let Ep be the average energy of one emitted photon • Number of emitted photons in one damping time can then be given by: AXEL - 2009

  24. Number of emitted photons in one damping time = • r.m.s. deviation = • The r.m.s. energy deviation = Quantum fluctuations (2) • The average photon energy Ep E3 Random process Energy of one emitted photon • The r.m.s. energy spread  E2 • The damping time  E3 Higher energy  faster longitudinal damping, but also larger energy spread AXEL - 2009

  25. N S N S N S N S N S N S beam S N S N S N S N S N S N Wigglers (1) • The damping time in all planes  • If the loss of energy, u, increases, the damping time decreases and the beam size reduces. • To be able to control the beam size we add ‘wigglers’ • It is like adding extra dipoles, however the wiggles does not give an overall trajectory change, but increases the photon emission AXEL - 2009

  26. Wigglers (2) • What does the wiggler in the different planes? • Vertically: • We do not really need it (no heating term), but the vertical emittance would be reduced • Horizontally: • The emittance will reduce. • A change in energy gives a change in radial position • We know the dispersion function: • In order to reduce the excitation of horizontal oscillations we should put our wiggler in a dispersion free area (D(s)=0) AXEL - 2009

  27. Wigglers increase longitudinal emittance and decrease transverse emittance Wigglers (3) • Longitudinally: • The wiggler will increase the number of photons emitted • It will increase the quantum fluctuations • It will increase the energy spread • Conclusion: AXEL - 2009

  28. Questions….,Remarks…? Damping Synchrotron radiation Quantum fluctuations Wigglers AXEL - 2009

More Related