1 / 36

Introduction to Hypothesis Testing for μ

This introduction explores the concept of hypothesis testing in the context of an infant touch intervention designed to increase child growth/weight. It discusses the research problem, known population parameters, sample data, and the process of evaluating the effect of the intervention on weight increase.

fore
Download Presentation

Introduction to Hypothesis Testing for μ

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction to HypothesisTesting for μ • Research Problem: • Infant Touch Intervention • Designed to increase child growth/weight • Weight at age 2: • Known population: • μ = 26 σ = 4 • Sample data: • n = 16 = 30 • Did intervention increase weight?

  2. Hypothesis Testing: • Using sample data to evaluate an hypothesis about a population parameter. • Usually in the context of a research study -------evaluate effect of a “treatment” • Compare to known μ • Can’t take difference at face value • Differences between and μ expected simply on the basis of chance • sampling variability • How do we know if it’s just chance? • Sampling distributions!

  3. Research Problem: • Infant Touch Intervention • Known population: μ = 26 σ = 4 • Assume intervention does NOT affect weight • Sample means ( ) should be close to population μ

  4. Compare Sample Data to know population: • z-test = • How much does deviate from μ? • What is the probability of this occurrence? • How do we determine this probability?

  5. Distribution of Sample Means (DSM)! • in the tails are low probability • How do we judge “low” probability of occurrence? • Widely accepted convention..... • < 5 in a 100 p< .05

  6. Logic of Hypothesis Testing • Rules for deciding how to decide! • Easier to prove something is false • Assume opposite of what you believe… • try to discredit this assumption…. • Two competing hypotheses: • (1)Null Hypothesis (H0 ) • The one you assume is true • The one you hope to discredit • (2)Alternative Hypothesis (H1 ) • The one you think is true

  7. Inferential statistics: • Procedures revolve around H0 • Rules for deciding when to reject or retain H0 • Test statistics or significance tests: • Many types: z-test t-test F-test • Depends on type of data and research design • Based on sampling distributions, assumes H0 is true • If observed statistic is improbable given H0, then H0 is rejected

  8. Hypothesis Testing Steps: • (1)State the Research Problem • Derived from theory • example: • Does touch increase child growth/weight? • (2)State statistical hypotheses • Two contradictory hypotheses: • (a) Null Hypothesis: H0 • There is noeffect • (b) Scientific Hypothesis: H1 • There is an effect • Also called alternative hypothesis

  9. Form of Ho and H1 for one-sample mean: • H0 : μ = 26 • H1 : μ <> 26 • Always about a population parameter, not a statistic • H0 : μ = population value • H1 : μ <> population value • non-directional (two-tailed) hypothesis • mutually exclusive :cannot both be true

  10. Example: • Infant Touch Intervention • Known population:μ = 26 σ = 4 • Did intervention affect child weight? • Statistical Hypotheses: • H0: μ = 26 • H1 : μ <> 26

  11. Hypothesis Testing Steps: • (3)Create decision rule • Decision rule revolves around H0, notH1 • When will you reject Ho? • …when values of are unlikely given H0 • Look in tails of sampling distribution • Divide distribution into two parts: • Values that are likely if H0 is true • Values close to H0 • Values that are very unlikely if H0 is true • Values far from H0 • Values in the tails • How do we decide what is likely and unlikely?

  12. Level of significance = alpha level = α • Probability chosen as criteria for “unlikely” • Common convention: α = .05 (5%) • Critical value = boundary between likely/unlikely outcomes • Critical region = area beyond the critical value

  13. Decision rule: • Reject H0 when observed test-statistic (z) equals or exceeds the Critical Value (when z falls within the Critical Region) • Otherwise, Retain H0

  14. Hypothesis Testing Steps: • (4) Collect data and Calculate “observed” test statistic • z-test for one sample mean: • A closer look at z: • z = sample mean – hypothesized population μ • standard error • z = observed difference • difference due to chance

  15. Hypothesis Testing Steps: • (5)Make a decision • Two possible decisions: • Reject H0 • Retain (Fail to Reject) H0 • Does observed z equal or exceed CV? • (Does it fall in the critical region?) • If YES, • Reject H0 = “statistically significant” finding • If NO, • Fail to Reject H0 = “non-significant” finding

  16. Hypothesis Testing Steps: • (6)Interpret results • Return to research question • statistical significance = not likely to be due to chance • Never “prove” or H0 or H1

  17. Example • (1) Does touch increase weight? • Population: μ = 26 σ = 4 • (2) Statistical Hypotheses: • H0 : μ = • H1 : μ <> • (3) Decision Rule: • α = .05 • Critical value: • (4) Collect sample data: n = 16 = 30 • Compute z-statistic: • (5) Make a decision: • (6) Interpret results: • Intervention appears to increase weight. Difference not likely to be due to chance.

  18. More about alpha (α) levels: • most common : α = .05 • more stringent : α = .01 • α = .001 • Critical values for two-tailed z-test:

  19.  = .05 p=.025 p=.025 1.96 +1.96 More About Hypothesis Testing • I. Two-tailed vs. One-tailed hypotheses • A. Two-tailed (non-directional): • H0:  = 26 • H1 :  26 • Region of rejection in both tails: • Divide α in half: • probability in each tail = α / 2

  20. p=.05 z +1.65 p=.05 z 1.65 • B. One-tailed (directional): • H0:  26 • H1 :  > 26 • Upper tail critical: • H0 :  26 • H1 :  < 26 • Lower tail critical:

  21. Examples: • Research hypotheses regarding IQ, where hyp= 100 • (1)Living next to a power station will lower IQ? • H0: • H1: • (2)Living next to a power station will increase IQ? • H0: • H1: • (3) Living next to a power station will affect IQ? • H0: • H1: • When in doubt, choose two-tailed!

  22. II. Selecting a critical value • Will be based on two pieces of information: • (a) Desired level of significance (α)? • α = alpha level • .05 .01 .001 • (b)Is H0 one-tailed or two-tailed? • If one-tailed: find CV for α • CV will be either + or - • If two-tailed: find CV for α /2 • CV will be both +/ - • Most Common choices: • α = .05 • two-tailed test

  23. Commonly used Critical Values for the z-statistic • Hypothesis α = .05 α =.01 • ______________________________________________ • Two-tailed  1.96  2.58 • H0:  = x • H1:  x • One-tailed upper + 1.65 + 2.33 • H0:  x • H1:  > x • One-tailed lower  1.65  2.33 • H0:  x • H1:  < x • ______________________________________________ • Where x = any hypothesized value of  under H0 • Note: critical values are larger when: • a more stringent (.01 vs. .05) • test is two-tailed vs. one-tailed

  24. III. Outcomes of Hypothesis Testing • Four possible outcomes: • True status of H0 • No Effect Effect • H0 true H0 false • Reject H0 • Decision • Retain H0 • Type I Error:Rejecting H0 when it’s actually true • Type II Error:Retaining H0 when it’s actually false • We never know the “truth” • Try to minimize probability of making a mistake

  25. A. Assume Ho is true • Only one mistake is relevant Type I error • α= level of significance • p (Type I error) • 1- α = level of confidence • p(correct decision), when H0 true • if α = .05, confidence = .95 • if α = .01, confidence = .99 • So, mistakes will be rare when H0 is true! • How do we minimize Type I error? • WE control error by choosing level of significance (α) • Choose α = .01 or .001 if error would be very serious • Otherwise, α = .05 is small but reasonable risk

  26. B. Assume Ho is false • Only one mistake is relevant Type II error •  = probability of Type II error • 1- = ”Power” • p(correct decision), when H0 false • How big is the “treatment effect”? • When “effect size” is big: • Effect is easy to detect •  is small (power is high) • When “effect size” is small: • Effect is easy to “miss” •  is large (power is low)

  27. How do you determine  and power (1-) • No single value for any hypothesis test • Requires us to guess how big the “effect” is • Power = probability of making a correct decision • when H0 is FALSE • C. How do we increase POWER? • Power will be greater (and Type II error smaller): • Larger sample size (n)Single best way to increase power! • Larger treatment effect • Less stringent a level e.g., choose .05 vs. .01 • One-tailed vs. two-tailed tests

  28. a 1-  Type I Error Power 1-a Confidence Type II Error Four Possible Outcomes of an Hypothesis Test • True status of H0 • H0 true H0 false • Reject H0 • Decision • Retain H0 • α = level of significance • probability of Type I Error • risk of rejecting a true H0 • 1- α = level of confidence • p (making correct decision), if H0 true •  = probability of Type II Error • risk of retaining a false H0 • 1- = power • p(making correct decision), if H0 false • ability to detect true effect

  29. IV. Additional Comments • A. Statistical significance vs. practical significance • “Statistically Significant” = H0 rejected • B. Assumptions of the z-test (see book for review): • DSM is normal • Known  (and  unaffected by treatment) • Random sampling • Independent observations • Rare to actually know ! • Preview  use t statistic when  unknown

  30. V. Reporting Results of an Hypothesis Test • If you reject H0: • “There was a statistically significantdifference in weight between children in the intervention sample (M = 30 lbs) and the general population (M = 30 lbs),z = 4.0, p < .05, two-tailed.” • If you fail to reject H0 : • “There was nosignificantdifference in weight between children in the intervention sample (M = 30 lbs) and the general population (M = 30 lbs),z = 1.0, p > .05, two-tailed.”

  31. A closer look… • z = 4.0, p < .05 test statistic level of significance observed value

  32. VI. Effect Size • Statistical significance vs. practical importance • How large is the effect, in practical terms? • Effect size = descriptive statistics that indicate the magnitude of an effect • Cohen’s d • Difference between means in standard deviation units • Guidelines for interpreting Cohen’s d

More Related