1 / 22

Morphology, Part 2

Morphology, Part 2. September 26, 2012. Quick Write Thoughts. Is it realistic to portray Mr. Burns as having a dictionary inside his head?. Quick Write Thoughts. Quick Write Thoughts. Quick Write Thoughts. In Our Last Episode. Words and morphemes (meaningful “word parts”)

gaerwn
Download Presentation

Morphology, Part 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Morphology, Part 2 September 26, 2012

  2. Quick Write Thoughts • Is it realistic to portray Mr. Burns as having a dictionary inside his head?

  3. Quick Write Thoughts

  4. Quick Write Thoughts

  5. Quick Write Thoughts

  6. In Our Last Episode • Words and morphemes (meaningful “word parts”) • Free and bound morphemes • Simple and complex words • Affixes and roots • Word-formation rules • Affixes attach to a root (or base) of a particular lexical category… • and create a new word.

  7. Layers of Words • Words that are formed through the addition of multiple affixes have a layered, or hierarchical structure. • One (ugly) way to represent this structure is through bracket notation: • [root] [construct] • [[affix] + [root]] [[re-] + [construct]] (=base) • [[base] + [affix]] [[[re-] + [construct]] + [-ion]] • WORD reconstruction

  8. Tree Structures • In this class, we’ll primarily stick with tree diagrams to represent word structure. • (because they look better and are easier to read) • re construct ion un desire able • Tree terminology: branches • nodes: where two branches meet • nodes represent constituents of the word

  9. Building the Perfect Beasts • To accurately capture all of the facts of word formation… • tree structures should represent the lexical categories of all constituents at each node in the tree. • Noun Adj • Verb Adj • Aff Verb Aff Aff Verb Aff • [re-] [construct] [-ion] [un-] [desire] [-able]

  10. Test Case • What should the tree diagram for “reassignment” look like? • Noun • Verb • Aff Verb Aff • [re-] [assign] [-ment] 3. reassignment 2. reassign 1. assign

  11. Another Test Case • How about the tree diagram for “miscategorization”? • Noun • Verb • Verb • Aff Noun Aff Aff • [mis-] [category] [-ize] [-ation] 4. miscategorization 3. miscategorize 2. categorize *miscategory 1. category

  12. Ambiguity • Some complex words can have more than one interpretation • Different derivations can result in different interpretations • Example: “unlockable” Note: [un-] can attach to both adjectives and verbs [-able] attaches to verbs and creatives adjectives

  13. Unlockable, part 1 • Adj • Adj • Aff Verb Aff • [un-] [lock] [-able] • = not able to be locked

  14. Unlockable, part 2 • Adj • Verb • Aff Verb Aff • [un-] [lock] [-able] • = able to be unlocked

  15. Inflections vs. Derivations • Linguists draw another distinction among affixes: • Inflectional affixes: • mark grammatical properties • (person, number, gender, tense, aspect) • don’t change other aspects of meaning • are required by rules of sentence structure • create a new “word form” • Derivational affixes: • change meaning • create a new word • (typically) have clear semantic content • may change the lexical category of the word

  16. Inflectional Affixes • There are precisely eight inflectional affixes in English: • -s 3rd person wait --> waits • -ing progressive wait --> waiting • -ed past tense wait --> waited • -en past participle eat --> eaten • -s plural card --> cards • -’s possessive dad --> dad’s • -er comparative tall --> taller • -est superlative weak --> weakest • All of these are suffixes.

  17. Inflectional Affixes • Other languages can have a lot more inflectional affixes. • Examples from French: parler “to speak” • 1st person, plural: parlons “We speak” • 2nd person, plural: parlez “You guys speak” • Past tense: • 1st person, singular: parlais “I spoke” • 1st person, plural: parlions “We spoke” • 2nd person, plural: parliez “You guys spoke” • Plus many, many more. • Note: Volapük. (http://www.visi.com/~dean/volverb.html)

  18. Derivational Affixes • In contrast to inflectional affixes, derivational affixes: • Create new words when they’re attached to roots • Examples: • re- cycle --> recycle • de- code --> decode • -y fish --> fishy • -ize vandal --> vandalize • Also: English has far more derivational affixes than inflectional affixes. • For fairness’ sake: http://www.visi.com/~dean/volword.html

  19. Picky, Picky (last time) • Inflectional affixes are always going to attach to a root with a particular part of speech. • Plural noun = singular noun + “s” • birds = bird + s dogs = dog + s • Past tense verb = present tense verb + “ed” • waited = wait + ed talked = talk + ed • Comparative adjective = adjective + “er” • taller = tall + er shorter = short + er • Q: if both a derivational and an inflectional affix attach to a root, which will attach first?

  20. The Relationship • A: Derivational affixes will always attach before inflectional affixes do. • Remember: derivational affixes create new words; • Inflectional affixes just create new word forms. • Examples: blackened, governments, *neighborshood • Verb Noun • Verb Noun • Adj DAff. IAff. Verb DAff. IAff. • black -en -ed govern -ment -s

  21. A Note on Word Forms • Morphologists use the term lexeme to refer to a group of related word forms. • wait, waits, waited, waiting, etc. • The canonical form of the lexeme is called the lemma. • = the “headword” in a dictionary. lemma word forms different lexeme • Inflectional affixes relate a lexeme to its various forms. • Derivational affixes relate one lexeme to another lexeme.

More Related