1 / 19

Standardization in Russia: reform experience and new areas of focus

Standardization in Russia: reform experience and new areas of focus. Alexey Abramov , Deputy Head of Rosstandard. ROSSTANDARD. Rosstandard today. National standards body. Member state of the BIPM. National enquiry point. C ompetent a dministrative / inspection authorit y.

gali
Download Presentation

Standardization in Russia: reform experience and new areas of focus

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Standardization in Russia: reform experience and new areas of focus AlexeyAbramov, Deputy Head of Rosstandard ROSSTANDARD

  2. Rosstandard today National standards body Member state of the BIPM National enquiry point Competent administrative/ inspectionauthority

  3. Economic challenge (12 years before) 1. Canceling the old (normative) standards; 2. Accession to the WTO; 3. Establishing transparent regulation for the product safety; 4. Deregulation technological processes; 5. Liberalization of certification requirements

  4. Reforms 1. Federal law"On Technical Regulating” (2002); 2. Common regulation in Custom Union (since 2008); 3. Over 30 regulatory acts for product safety; 4. Federal law “On accreditation” (2013)

  5. Results 1. Huge growth of external trade; 2. 27880 actual voluntary standards (GOST, GOST R); 3. Over 2300 standards development yearly; 4. 47% standards harmonize with ISO/IEC

  6. Standardizationprogress (годы)

  7. Harmonization International standards USA standards

  8. Problems How to: 1.Save positive economic results; 2. Increase competitiveness; 3. Develop labor productivity; 4. Step up export

  9. Development of national standardization • Conception-2020 Industrial promotion (mining operations, pipeline transport, metallurgy); Decrease trade barriers; Provide best practice; Support a SME; Innovation transfer

  10. Benefits of standardization • 1. Fast new technology adoption; • 2. Well-balanced and professionally considered solution thru the consensus; • 3. Working knowledge and practice; • 4. Tangible effect with relevant investing; • 5. Equivalent national technical requirements for global trade and industry diversification

  11. Standards potential for contribution to GDP • * Approximately $10 bill. per year

  12. 12 Precondition of Law on Standardization • Call of economic and regulatory for active use standards • Develop un-rated potential of standardization for economic growth

  13. Key points of Law on Standardization 1. Legal base to standardization; 2. Harmonize processes; 3. Normative references to standards; 4. Government contracts in accordance with standards

  14. References to standards • Effective industrial policy; • Adoption new technologies: • -composite materials; • -nanomaterials; • -best available techniques; • -GMP, GLP, GCP, etc; • Simplification of legal regulation

  15. Financing development standards

  16. Actual tasks Involve business in standardization; Implementation of IT-services to national and regional standardization; Promotion of Russian technical language in ISO/IEC; Regional standardization in CIS; International cooperation

  17. New areas of standardization Biotechnology; Engineering and industrial design; Construction; IT-services for military-industrial complex; GLONASS; Auto-road materials; Anti-counterfeiting;

  18. MOU on cooperation in the field of standardization

  19. Postscript What is not competently standardized calls for too much of craftsmanlike skill, reflection, and individual elaboration, and is therefore not available for economical use in the processes Thorstein Veblen. The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)

More Related