1 / 45

Thermochemical Conversion Technologies

Thermochemical Conversion Technologies. Combustion Types. Incineration (energy recovery through complete oxidation) Mass Burn Refuse Derived Fuel Pyrolysis Gasification Plasma arc (advanced thermal conversion). Gasification.

Download Presentation

Thermochemical Conversion Technologies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Thermochemical Conversion Technologies

  2. Combustion Types • Incineration (energy recovery through complete oxidation) • Mass Burn • Refuse Derived Fuel • Pyrolysis • Gasification • Plasma arc (advanced thermal conversion)

  3. Gasification • Partial oxidation process using air, pure oxygen, oxygen enriched air, hydrogen, or steam • Produces electricity, fules (methane, hydrogen, ethanol, synthetic diesel), and chemical products • Temperature > 1300oF • More flexible than incineration, more technologically complex than incineration or pyrolysis, more public acceptance

  4. Flexibility of Gasification

  5. Pyrolysis • Thermal degradation of carbonaceous materials • Lower temperature than gasification (750 – 1500oF) • Absence or limited oxygen • Products are pyrolitic oils and gas, solid char • Distribution of products depends on temperature • Pyrolysis oil used for (after appropriate post-treatment): liquid fuels, chemicals, adhesives, and other products. • A number of processes directly combust pyrolysis gases, oils, and char

  6. Pyrolyzer—Mitsui R21

  7. Thermoselect (Gasification and Pyrolysis) • Recovers a synthesis gas, utilizable glass-like minerals, metals rich in iron and sulfur from municipal solid waste, commercial waste, industrial waste and hazardous waste • High temperature gasification of the organic waste constituents and direct fusion of the inorganic components. • Water, salt and zinc concentrate are produced as usable raw materials during the process water treatment. • No ashes, slag or filter dusts • 100,000 tpd plant in Japan operating since 1999

  8. Thermoselect (http://www.thermoselect.com/index.cfm)

  9. Fulcrum Bioenergy MSW to Ethanol Plant

  10. Plasma Arc • Heating Technique using electrical arc • Used for combustion, pyrolysis, gasification, metals processing • Originally developed by SKF Steel in Sweden for reducing gas foriron manufacturing • Plasma direct melting reactor developed by Westinghouse Plasma Corp. • Further developed for treating hazardous feedstocks (Contaminated soils, Low-level radioactive waste, Medical waste) • Temperatures (> 1400oC) sufficient to slag ash • Plasma power consumption 200-400 kWh/ton • Commercial scale facilities for treating MSW in Japan

  11. Plasma Arc Technology in Florida • Green Power Systems is proposing to build and operate a plasma arc facility to process 1,000 tons per day of municipal solid waste (garbage) in Tallahassee, Florida. • Geoplasma is proposing to build a similar facility for up to 3,000 tons of solid waste per day in St. Lucie County, claims 120 MW will be produced • Health risks, economics, and technical issues still remain

  12. Process • Heated using • direct current arc plasma for high T organic waste destruction and gasification and • Alternating current powered, resistance hearing to maintain more even T distribution in molten bath

  13. Waste Incineration - Advantages • Volume and weight reduced (approx. 90% vol. and 75% wt reduction) • Waste reduction is immediate, no long term residency required • Destruction in seconds where LF requires 100s of years • Incineration can be done at generation site • Air discharges can be controlled • Ash residue is usually non-putrescible, sterile, inert • Small disposal area required • Cost can be offset by heat recovery/ sale of energy

  14. Waste Incineration - Disadvantages • High capital cost • Skilled operators are required (particularly for boiler operations) • Some materials are noncombustible • Some material require supplemental fuel

  15. Waste Incineration - Disadvantages • Air contaminant potential (MACT standards have substantially reduced dioxin, WTE 19% of Hg emissions in 1995 – 90% reduction since then) • Volume of gas from incineration is 10 x as great as other thermochemical conversion processes, greater cost for gas cleanup/pollution control • Public disapproval • Risk imposed rather than voluntary • Incineration will decrease property value (perceived not necessarily true) • Distrust of government/industry ability to regulate

  16. Carbon and Energy Considerations • Tonne of waste creates 3.5 MW of energy during incineration (eq. to 300 kg of fuel oil) powers 70 homes • Biogenic portion of waste is considered CO2 neutral (tree uses more CO2 during its lifecycle than released during combustion) • Unlike biochemical conversion processes, nonbiogenic CO2 is generated • Should not displace recycling

  17. WTE Process

  18. Three Ts • Time • Temperature • Turbulence

  19. System Components • Refuse receipt/storage • Refuse feeding • Grate system • Air supply • Furnace • Boiler

  20. Energy/Mass Balance Energy Loss (Radiation) Flue Gas Waste Mass Loss (unburned C in Ash)

  21. Flue Gas Pollutants • Particulates • Acid Gases • NOx • CO • Organic Hazardous Air Pollutants • Metal Hazardous Air Pollutants

  22. Particulates • Solid • Condensable • Causes • Too low of a comb T (incomplete comb) • Insufficient oxygen or overabundant EA (too high T) • Insufficient mixing or residence time • Too much turbulence, entrainment of particulates • Control • Cyclones - not effective for removal of small particulates • Electrostatic precipitator  • Fabric Filters (baghouses) 

  23. Metals • Removed with particulates • Mercury remains volatilized • Tough to remove from flue gas • Remove source or use activated carbon (along with dioxins)

  24. Acid Gases • From Cl, S, N, Fl in refuse (in plastics, textiles, rubber, yd waste, paper) • Uncontrolled incineration - 18-20% HCl with pH 2 • Acid gas scrubber (SO2, HCl, HFl) usually ahead of ESP or baghouse • Wet scrubber • Spray dryer • Dry scrubber injectors

  25. Nitrogen removal • Source removal to avoid fuel NOx production • T < 1500 F to avoid thermal NOx • Denox sytems - selective catalytic reaction via injection of ammonia

  26. Air Pollution Control • Remove certain waste components • Good Combustion Practices • Emission Control Devices

  27. Devices • Electrostatic Precipitator • Baghouses • Acid Gas Scrubbers • Wet scrubber • Dry scrubber • Chemicals added in slurry to neutralize acids • Activated Carbon • Selective Non-catalytic Reduction

  28. Stoichiometric Insufficient O2 Excess Air Role of Excess Air – Control Three Ts T Amount of Air Added

  29. Stoichiometric Insufficient O2 Excess Air Role of Excess Air – Cont’d Increasing Moisture Amount of Air Added

  30. Role of Excess Air – Cont’d Stoichiometric NOx T Optimum T Range (1500 – 1800 oF) PICs/Particulates Insufficient O2 Excess Air Amount of Air Added

  31. Ash • Bottom Ash – recovered from combustion chamber • Heat Recovery Ash – collected in the heat recovery system (boiler, economizer, superheater) • Fly Ash – Particulate matter removed prior to sorbents • Air Pollution Control Residues – usually combined with fly ash • Combined Ash – most US facilities combine all ashes

  32. Schematic Presentation of Bottom Ash Treatment

  33. Ash Reuse Options • Construction fill • Road construction • Landfill daily cover • Cement block production • Treatment of acid mine drainage

  34. Refuse Boiler Fabric Filter Stack Spray Dryer Tipping Floor Ash Conveyer Metal Recovery Mass Burn Facility – Pinellas County

  35. Overhead Crane

  36. Turbine Generator

  37. Fabric Filter

  38. Conclusions • Combustion remains predominant thermal technology for MSW conversion with realized improvements in emissions • Gasification and pyrolysis systems now in commercial scale operation but industry still emerging • Improved environmental data needed on operating systems • Comprehensive environmental or life cycle assessments should be completed

  39. Return to Home page Updated August 2008

More Related