360 likes | 395 Views
INVETORY MANAGEMENT. WHY. PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING INVENTORY. SATISFY CUSTOMER DEMANDS AVOID STOCK OUTS PROVIDE CUSHION FOR VARRYING DEMANDS & FLUCTUATING SUPPLIES PROTECT AGAINST PRICE ESCALATION AVAIL QUANTITY DISCOUNTS OPTIMISE COST OF PROCUREMENT. CATAGORIES OF INVENTORY.
E N D
PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING INVENTORY • SATISFY CUSTOMER DEMANDS • AVOID STOCK OUTS • PROVIDE CUSHION FOR VARRYING DEMANDS & FLUCTUATING SUPPLIES • PROTECT AGAINST PRICE ESCALATION • AVAIL QUANTITY DISCOUNTS • OPTIMISE COST OF PROCUREMENT
CATAGORIES OF INVENTORY • RAW MATERIALS & COMPONENTS • CONUMABLES & SPARES • WIP ( WORK IN PROGRESS ) • MATERIALS IN TRANSIT • FINISHED GOODS
ELEMENTS OF COSTSIN INVENTORY MGMT • ORDERING COST (COST OF REPLENISHMENT ORDES) • INVENTORY CARRYING COST • STOCKOUT COST (COST OF UNDERSTOCKING)
ELEMENTS OF ORDERING COST • TENDERING & PROCESSING COST • STATIONARY & COMMUNICATION COST • FOLLOW-UP COSTS • INWARD RECEIPT & HANDLING COST • INSPECTION & VERIFICATION COST • SALARIES & WAGES OF PURCHASERS
ELEMENTS OF INVENTORY CARRYING COST • INTEREST ON CAPITAL • INSURANCE & TAX • STORAGE & HANDLING • MAITENANCE & PRESERVATION • DETERIORATION & OBSOLESCENCE • THEFT & PILFERAGE • WAREHOUSE RENTAL • SALARIES & WAGES OF STORES STAFF
MAX INV. LEVEL 100 QUANTITY 4 4 4 MONTHS ANNUAL DEMAND=300
WHAT DO WE OBSERVE HERE ? • INVENTORY CARRYING COST IS DIRECTLY PROPORTIONAL TO QUANTITY ON ORDER • ORDERING COST IS INVERSELY PROPORTIONAL TO THE QUANTITY ON ORDER • TOTAL COST INITIALLY TENDS TO DECREASE AND THEN INCREASES WITH INCREASE IN QUANTITY ON ORDER
TOTAL ANNUAL COST COST INVETORY CARRYING COST ORDERING COST EOQ ORDER QUANTITY
ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY(EOQ) • ANNUAL DEMAND IN QUANTITY : D • QUANTITY PER ORDER (ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY) : Q • ORDERING COST ( COST PER ORDER IN RUPEES ) : Co • INV. CARRYING COST IN RUPEES PER UNIT PER YEAR : Cc • NO. OF ORDERS PER ANNUM: D/Q • ANNUAL ORDERING COST: (D /Q ) x Co • AVERAGE INV. CARRIED DURING THE YEAR: (MAX + MIN) / 2 = (Q + 0 ) / 2 = Q / 2 • COST OF CARRYING INVENTORY PER YEAR : (Q/2) x Cc
ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY(EOQ) • TOTAL COST ‘ C : = ORDERING COST + INV. CARRYING COST = ( D/Q ) . Co + ( Q/2 ) . Cc • AT EOQ O: ORDERING COST = INV. CARRYING COST ( D/Q ) . Co = ( Q/2 ) . Cc Q X Q = 2 X D X Co / Cc • Q = √ ( 2DCo / Cc ) • ‘Q’ IS THE ECONOMIC ORDER QUANTITY
PROBLEM • ZEN BICYCLE LTD. SOURCES 3000 SEAT COVERS FOR ITS BICYCLES FROM OUTSIDE SUPPLIER. • ORDERING COST IS Rs 10 PER ORDER • INV. CARRYING COST PER UNIT PER YEAR IS Rs. 6 • COMPANY HAS 300 WORKING DAYS • FIND: • EOQ • NO. OF ORDERS PER YEAR • TOTAL INVENTORY COST • NO. OF INVENTORY CYCLES IN A YEAR • DURATION OF INV. CYCLE
SOLUTION • EOQ: Q = √( 2DCo / Cc ) = √( 2 X 3000 X 10 / 6 ) = 100 • Q = 100 UNITS • NO. OF ORDERS PER YEAR: • 3000 / 100 = 30 • ANNUAL ORDERING COST = 30 X 10 = Rs 300 • AV. INV. PER CYCLE= ( 100 X 6 ) / 2 = Rs 300 • TOTAL COST = Rs 300 + Rs 300 = Rs 600 • NO OF INV CYCLE PER YEAR (300 WORKING DAYS) =30 • DURATION OF EACH CYCLE = 300 / 30 = 10 DAYS
PROBLEM • TRINITY HOSPITAL, BANGLORE SOURCES 20,000 SYRINGES EVERY YEAR FROM A LOCAL SUPPLIER • ORDERING COST PER ORDER IS Rs 100 AND INV. CARRY COST IS Rs 1 PER UNIT PER YEAR. • THE PRICE OF A SYRINGE IS Rs 5. • DETERMINE QUANTITY TO BE ORDERED EVERY TIME. • WHAT WILL BE TOTAL ORDERING COST AND TOTAL STORAGE COST DURING THE YEAR? • WHAT WILL BE THE TOTAL ANNUAL COST TO THE HOSPITAL ON SYRINGES
SOLUTION • D=20000; Co= 100; Cc= 1 ; P=5 • EOQ ‘Q’ = √( 2DCo / Cc ) = √( 2x20000 x100 / 1) = 2000 UNITS • TOTAL INV. CARRY COST: (2000/2) X 1=1000 • TOTAL ORDERING COST: 20000/2000 X 100 =1000 • TOTAL ANNUAL COST: • = 20000X5 + 1000 + 1000 = 102,000
MAX INV. LEVEL Q RE-ORDER POINT QUANTITY L L L MIN. INV. LEVEL T T T TIME
MAX INV. LEVEL Q RE-ORDER POINT QUANTITY L L L T T T TIME
MAX INV. LEVEL Q RE-ORDER POINT QUANTITY L L L T T T TIME
MAX INV. LEVEL = SAFETY STOCK + RE-ORDER QUANTITY RE-ORDER POINT= SAFETY STOCK + LEADTIME CONSUMPTION RE-ORDER QUANTITY = EOQ L L L BUFFER STOCK OR SAFETY STOCK == MIN. INV. LEVEL S S
NEED FOR SAFETY STOCK • STOCKOUT COSTS ARE VERY HIGH • TO TAKE CARE OF THE UNCERTAINTY OF DEMAND AND SUPPLY DURING THE LEAD TIME SAFETY STOCKS ARE MAINTAINED • SAFETY STOCK = K X STD. DEVIATION OF LTD X √AVERAGE LEAD TIME • ‘K’ : IS A FACTOR DEPENDING UPON CRITICALITY OF DEMAND • ‘LTD’ ; IS AVERAGE DEMAND DURING THE LEAD TIME • GENERALLY VALUE OF ‘K’ VARRIES FROM 0.1 – 3.0 AS IN FLG. TABLE:
ESTIMATION OF SAFETY STOCK( BASED ON STANDARD DEVIATION IN LEAD TIME DEMAND) • STANDARD DEVIATION IN DEMAND PER MONTH = 20 • LEAD TIME =4 M0NTHS • STANDARD DEVIATION IN LEAD TIME DEMAND SD LTD = SD OF DEMAND PER UNIT TIME X √ LEAD TIME = 20 X √ 4 = 40 • UNDER SUPER CRITICAL CIRCUM STANCES: • SERVICE LEVEL = 99.9 PERCENT • CORRESPONDING VALUE OF ‘K’ = 3 • SAFETY STOCK = K X SD LTD • SAFETY STOCK = 3 X 40 = 120
LEVELS FOR INVENTORY CONTROL • MINIMUM INVENTORY LEVEL: RESERVE + SAFETY STOCK • RE-ORDER LEVEL: ROL = LEAD TIME DEMAND ( LTD ) + RESERVE (R) + SAFETY STOCK ( SS ) • RE-ORDER QUANTITY: ROQ = EOQ • MAX INV. LEVEL = ROQ + RESERVE + SAFETY
Selective Inventory Control Techniques: A B C : V E D : F S N & X Y Z Analysis
VITAL FEW : TRIVIAL MANY • A FEW CUSTOMERS ACCOUNT FOR MAJORITY OF SALES • A FEW PROCESSES ACOUNT FOR BULK OF THE SCRAP OR RE-WORK • A FEW NON-CONFORMITIES ACCOUNT FOR MAJORITY OF CUSTOMER COMPLAINTS • A FEW PRODUCTS ACCOUNT FOR MAJOR SHARE IN PROFITS • A FEW ITEMS OF INVENTORY ACCOUNT FOR BULK OF THE WORKING CAPITAL • STOCK OUT OF A FEW ITEMS ACCOUNT FOR SEVERE LOSS IN PRODUCTION • A FEW ITEMS OF INVENTORY ACCOUNT FOR MAJOR SHARE OF THE TOTAL INVENTORY COST • A FEW ITEMS OF INVENTORY DO NOT MOVE AT ALL • A FEW ITEMS ARE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO PROCURE WHILE OTHERS ARE EASILY AVAILABLE
A B C ANALYSIS • PARETO ANALYSIS ( ALFREDO PARETO ) • 80 – 20 PRINCIPLE • CONTROL ON 20 PERCENT VARRIABLES CAN PRODUCE 80 PERCENT RESULTS
ITEMS ON INVENTORY 0 20 40 60 80 100 100 80 60 ANNUAL CONSUMPTION VALUE 40 20 0
PROBLEM • CLASSIFY THE FOLLOWING ITEMS OF INVENTORY IN A B C CATEGORY BASED ON ANNUAL CONSUMPTION VALUE: • SOLUTION: • WORKOUT ANNUAL CONSUMPTION VALUE OF EACH ITEM • RANK THEM IN DESCENDING ORDER OF CONSUMPTION VALUE • SUMMATION OF INDIVIDUAL CONSUMPTION VALUES WILL GIVE • THE TOTAL INVENTORY CONSUMPTION VALUE DURING THE YEAR ANNUAL CONSUMPTION CONSUMPTION VALUE CODE PRICE RANK M 1 400 07 M 5 1950 11 M 6 40 10 M 9 1000 05 M 15 14 20 M 25 2400 07 M 30 08 160 M 2 800 06 M 7 100 07 M 13 50 09 TOTAL VALUE OF INVENTORY CONSUMPTION
SOLUTION: • A B C CLASSIFICATION BASED ON ANNUAL CONSUMPTION VALUE • WORKOUT ANNUAL CONSUMPTION VALUE OF EACH ITEM • RANK THEM IN DESCENDING ORDER OF CONSUMPTION VALUE • SUMMATION OF INDIVIDUAL CONSUMPTION VALUES WILL GIVE • THE TOTAL INVENTORY CONSUMPTION VALUE DURING THE YEAR ANNUAL CONSUMPTION CONSUMPTION VALUE CODE PRICE RANK 5 M 1 400 07 2800 M 5 1950 11 214501 1 M 6 40 10 400 9 M 9 1000 05 5000 3 M 15 14 20 280 10 M 25 2400 07 16800 2 M 30 08 1280 6 160 M 2 800 06 4800 4 M 7 100 07 700 7 M 13 450 50 09 8 TOTAL VALUE OF INVENTORY CONSUMPTION 53960
TABULATE VALUES IN DESCENDING ORDER • COMPUTE CUMULATIVE VALUE WHICH WILL BE IN ASCENDING ORDER • CALCULATE ANNUAL CONSUMPTION OF EACH ITEM AS PERCENTILE • OF THE TOTAL ANNUAL INVENTORY CONSUMPTION • IDENTIFY TOTAL NUMBER OF ITEMS RESPONSIBLE • FOR 80% OF CONSUMPTION VALUE AND CLASSIFY AS ‘A’ ITEMS • NEXT IITEMS WHICH ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR 10-15% OF THE TOTAL INVENTORY CONSUMPTION VALUE CAN BE CLASSIFIED AS ‘B’. • THE REST ARE CLASSIFIED AS ‘C’ WHICH CONSTITUTE 65-70% OF TOTAL ITEMS & ACCOUNT FOR 5% OF ANNUAL CONSUMPTION ANNUAL CONSUMPTION VALUE CUMULATIVE VALUE CONSUMPTION. AS % OF TOTAL INV.CONSUMPTN CODE CLASS A M 5 21450 21450 39.8 M 25 16800 38250 70.9 A M 9 5000 43250 80.2 B M 2 4800 48050 89.0 B M 1 50850 2800 94.2 B M 30 1280 52130 96.6 C M 7 52830 97.9 C 700 M 13 450 53280 98.7 C M 6 400 53680 99.5 C M 15 100 280 53960 C
PROBLEM • CLASSIFY THE FOLLOWING ITEMS OF INVENTORY IN A B C CATEGORY BASED ON ANNUAL CONSUMPTION VALUE: • SOLUTION: • WORKOUT ANNUAL CONSUMPTION VALUE OF EACH ITEM • RANK THEM IN DESCENDING ORDER OF CONSUMPTION VALUE • SUMMATION OF INDIVIDUAL CONSUMPTION VALUES WILL GIVE • THE TOTAL INVENTORY CONSUMPTION VALUE DURING THE YEAR ANNUAL CONSUMPTION CONSUMPTION VALUE CODE PRICE RANK M 1 120 10 M 5 240 04 M 6 1700 O2 M 9 139 05 M 15 08 345 M 25 512 07 M 30 O1 1100 M 2 865 O3 M 7 730 06 M 13 637 09 TOTAL VALUE OF INVENTORY CONSUMPTION
MULTI – UNIT SELECTIVE INVENTORY CONTROL: – THREE DIMENSIONAL APPROACH ( MUSIC-3D )