1 / 17

ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 178 Deaths

ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 178 Deaths. (423). (224). (137). (32). Months % Survival 1 83 % 3 74 % 6 67 % 12 50 %. Deaths / Month. Percent Survival. Hazard. Event: Death after Implant *. 2005. ISHLT. Months after Device Implant.

gen
Download Presentation

ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 178 Deaths

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 178 Deaths (423) (224) (137) (32) Months % Survival 1 83 % 3 74 % 6 67 % 12 50 % Deaths / Month Percent Survival Hazard Event: Death after Implant * 2005 ISHLT Months after Device Implant J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 * censored at transplant

  2. 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 Primary Device Implant: LVAD + RVAD at the same operation (biventricular failure) Predicted % Mortality at 6 months LVAD alone (left ventricular failure) Age (years) at Device Implant

  3. ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004 (n=655) 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 Infection Episodes (n=668) 175 Cumulative Events per 100 Patients Bleeding Episodes (n=396) 75 Thromboembolism Episodes (n=86) 18 Months after Device Implant

  4. ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 66 Patients with Major Device Malfunction 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 (410) (212) (122) (38) Months % Survival 1 95 % 3 92 % 6 84 % 12 66 % Percent Freedom from Major Device Malfunction Major Device Adverse Event / Month Hazard Event: Death after Implant * Months after Device Implant * censored at transplant

  5. 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004 Bridge to Transplant Age > = 50 (n=292) Age < 30 (n=52)

  6. Alive (Still waiting) Proportion of Patients 45 % Explanted (recovery) 45 % 37 % 27 % Death (before transplant) 12 % Transplanted 17 % 12 % 5 % 2005 ISHLT Months after Device Implant J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004 Intent to Treat: Bridge to Recovery (n=35)

  7. ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004 Intent to Treat: Destination Therapy (n=78) Alive 65 % 55 % Proportion of Patients 33 % 34 % Death 11 % Transplanted 2 % 0 % Explanted (recovery) 0 % 2005 ISHLT Months after Device Implant J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187

  8. 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004 Destination Therapy Age < 65 (n=37) Age >= 65 (n=41)

  9. 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 Primary Device Implant n LVAD (alone) 542* Pulsatile flow, chronic device 487 Continuous flow, chronic device 39 LVAD + RVAD Combinations 100 TAH Pulsatile flow, chronic device 13 Total 655 * Type of VAD not specified in 16 patients

  10. 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 Intention to Treat n % of 655 Bridge to transplant 513 78.3% Bridge to recovery 35 5.3% Destination Therapy 78 11.9% Not specified 29 4.4% Total 655 100%

  11. 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655

  12. 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 Risk factors for death* after device implant

  13. ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 Summary of Post-Implantation Patient-related Events 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187

  14. 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 Major Device Malfunctions n Controller 31 Pump/pump drive unit 14 Pump thrombosis 13 Pump inflow 11 Percutaneous lead/drive line 4 Pump outflow 4 Cannula dislodgement 1 Power base electrical malfunction 1 Pump stoppage 1 Other 3 Total Events 83 66 Patients with 83 major device malfunctions

  15. 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 Intent to Treat: Bridge to Recovery Primary Device Implant n LVAD (alone) 21* Pulsatile flow, chronic device 16 Continuous flow, chronic device 1 LVAD + RVAD Combinations 14 Total 35 * Type of VAD not specified in 4 patients

  16. 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 Indications for Destination Therapy n % of 78 Advanced age 38 48.7% Co-morbidity 28 35.9% Fixed pulmonary hypertension 8 10.3% Contraindication to immunotherapy 2 2.6% Patient refuses transplant 2 2.6% Total 78 100%

  17. 2005 ISHLT J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:1182-1187 ISHLT/MCSD Analysis: Jan 2002 – Dec 2004, n=655 Intent to Treat: Destination Therapy Primary Device Implant n LVAD (alone) 74 Pulsatile flow, chronic device 71 Continuous flow, chronic device 3 LVAD + RVAD Combinations 3 TAH Pulsatile flow, chronic device 1 Total 78

More Related