1 / 55

Marriage, Divorce, and Asymmetric Information

Marriage, Divorce, and Asymmetric Information. Leora Friedberg Steven Stern University of Virginia University of Virginia March 2007. Model. U h , U w = utility of husband, wife from being married  h ,  w = component of U that is observable to spouse

gerek
Download Presentation

Marriage, Divorce, and Asymmetric Information

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Marriage, Divorce, and Asymmetric Information Leora Friedberg Steven Stern University of Virginia University of Virginia March 2007

  2. Model Uh, Uw = utility of husband, wife from being married h, w = component of U that is observable to spouse h, w= component of U that is private information p = side payment (p>0 if the husband makes a side payment to the wife)

  3. Caring Preferences • Vh(Uh ,Uw) and Vw(Uh ,Uw) • Non-negative derivatives • Bounds on altruism

  4. Perfect Information • With perfect information, the marriage continues iff Vh(Uh ,Uw) + Vw(Uh ,Uw) >0

  5. Perfect information • If preferences are not caring, marriages continue as long as: • Suppose spouse j is unhappy (j+j<0) • Spouse i is willing to pay p to j so that j is happy (j+p+j>0) as long as spouse i remains happy enough (i-p+i>0)

  6. Perfect Information • If preferences are caring, then there is a reservation value of εw • The probability of a divorce is Fw(εw*)

  7. Partial Information

  8. Partial Information • The husband chooses p*:

  9. An Equilibrium Exists: • (monotonicity) • (reservation values) εw*, εh* • (effect of p on res val) • (comp statics for p) • (information in p) • (comp statics for div prob)

  10. Proof sketch • Assume (temporarily) that

  11. Proof Sketch • And show that • And then • And then • And then • And then • And then

  12. Proof Sketch • And then • And then • And then Schauder fixed point theorem • And then comp stats for divorce probs

  13. Partial Information wo/ Caring • Suppose the husband makes an offer p • As before, they fail to agree (and divorce) if p is such that: h-p+h< 0 or w+p+w< 0 • Now, this may occur inefficiently: • a higher p could preserve the marriage • a higher p won’t be offered because the wife is unobservably unhappier than the husband believes • If p is acceptable, the marriage continues

  14. Partial Information wo/ Caring • The husband chooses his offer p* as follows: • he has beliefs about the density f(w)of his wife’s private information w • p* maximizes his expected utility from marriage, given those beliefs: E[Uh] = [h-p+h]*[1-F(-w-p)]  p* solves [h-p+h ]*[f(-w-p)]-[1-F(-w-p)] = 0

  15. Partial information • p* is bigger if the husband is happier (unobservably or observably): dp*/dh> 0, dp*/dh>0 • p* is smaller if the wife is observably happier: dp*/dw< 0 • The probability that Uw 0 (so the marriage continues after the offer p*) is higher if the husband is observably happier: Pr[w+p+w 0]/h 0

  16. Other results • We can compute utility from marriage, after the side payment • Expected utility from marriage • Loss in utility (or expected utility) due to asymmetric information

  17. Government policy • Consider adding (or increasing) a divorce cost D • Husband pays D, wife pays (1-)D • Now, p* maximizes the husband’s expected utility from marriage minus expected divorce costs: E[Uh] = [h-p+h]*[1-F(-w-(1-)D-p)] - D*F(-w-(1- )D-p)

  18. Impact of the divorce cost • Fewer divorces • p* may rise or fall • Expected utility from marriage may rise or fall

  19. An example • Assume that i  iid N(0,1), i = h,w • Then the optimal payment p( hh) solves: • we can use this to compute p*, the divorce probability, total expected value E[Uh]+E[Uw], welfare effects • we can show how they vary with the husband’s happiness h+h and the wife’s observable happiness w

  20. Empirical analysis • Data from the National Survey of Families and Households (NSFH) • The NSFH reports: • each spouse’s happiness in marriage • each spouse’s beliefs about the other’s happiness • We can estimate determinants of each spouse’s happiness, the correlation of their happiness • We can infer the magnitude of side payments

  21. Selection • The NSFH sample is a random sample of 13008 households surveyed in 1987. • We excluded 6131 households because there was no married couple, 4 because racial information was missing, 796 because the husband was younger than 20 or older than 65, and 1835 because at least one of the dependent variables was missing. • This left a sample of 4242 married couples.

  22. Selection • The NSFH sample is a random sample of 13008 households surveyed in 1987. • We excluded 6131 households (no married couple), 4 (racial information was missing), 796 (the husband was younger than 20 or older than 65), and 1835 (at least one of the dependent variables was missing). • This left a sample of 4242 married couples.

  23. Dependent Variable • Responses by each spouse to the following questions: • Even though it may be very unlikely, think for a moment about how various areas of your life might be different if you separated. How do you think your overall happiness would change? [1-Much worse; 2-Worse; 3-Same; 4-Better; 5-Much better] • How about your partner? How do you think his/her overall happiness might be different if you separated? [same measurement scale]

  24. Overheard Interviews and Bias

  25. Estimation wo/ Caring • Dependent variables: each spouse’s utility from marriage before side payments p each spouse’s happiness: u*h = h+h , u*w = w+w • We assume the following: each spouse’s belief about the other spouse’s happiness: v*h = Eh[u*w] = w , v*w = Ew[u*h] = h observable happiness depends on observable control variables Xi: either h i = Xih, w = Xiw or h i = Xi, w = Xi • People actually report discrete values: uh, uw, vh, vw • We estimate , the variance  of (h,w), and the cutoff points determining how happiness u*,v* maps into discrete values u,v

  26. Estimation • Log likelihood of each couple i:

  27. Estimation w/ Caring • Specify • Impose restrictions:

  28. Estimation w/ Caring • Objective function is log likelihood function with penalty for not matching divorce probabilities in CPS data

  29. Specification Tests • Kids on divorce – no significant effect • Marriage duration on signal noise variance – t-statistic = -10.11 • New kid on signal noise variance – t-statistic = 2.20

More Related