1 / 22

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: So WHY should I care?

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: So WHY should I care?. Remarks by Sherry Sterling Senior Advisor, OPP PREP Course 13 June 2005. Critical Components of Program Success. CLEAR GOALS Public Health & Ecological Protection Outcomes. MEANINGFUL ACCOUNTABILITY Measures & Tracking. GOOD PLANNING

gerry
Download Presentation

PERFORMANCE MEASURES: So WHY should I care?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PERFORMANCE MEASURES:So WHY should I care? Remarks by Sherry Sterling Senior Advisor, OPP PREP Course 13 June 2005

  2. Critical Components of Program Success CLEAR GOALS Public Health & Ecological Protection Outcomes MEANINGFUL ACCOUNTABILITY Measures & Tracking GOOD PLANNING Strategic Objectives EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION Multiple Levels ADEQUATE RESOURCES Acquisition & Allocation

  3. AccountabilityDrivers in EPA Statutes EPA 5 Year Strategic Plan 3 Year NPM Commitments Budget Formulation Annual Work Plan Performance Standards Budget Allocation Tracking Systems/Reporting Audits

  4. Government Performance and Review Act (GPRA) • GPRA is a statute aimed at increasing accountability for all federal agencies by requiring measurement of program results & linking those results to resource allocation. • Provides a statutory framework for strategic planning and reporting that requires federal agencies to: • Establish accountability measures to assess the outcomes of each program activity, and • Prepare performance plans that establish annual performance goals.

  5. GPRA: Auditing Function • Office of Management & Budget (OMB) assumed the role of evaluating progress against GPRA, developing the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) • OMB is committed to audit all federally funded programs against GPRA requirements on a 5 year cycle. • This is the third year. Several Pesticide Programs have been audited.

  6. PART: Outcomes Principle focus has been on Outcome Measures. Short turn-around times for agencies to develop their data. Average scores have been very low; many classified as “Results Not Demonstrated”. “Re-PARTing” is the norm. Results are published each year with the federal budget. Programs not demonstrating results for successive years are subject to budget cuts or elimination.

  7. How do we measure?OUTPUTS • An activity, effort, or work product related to a goal • May be quantitative or qualitative • Must be measurable during the funding period • Examples: number of policies developed, number of REDs issued

  8. How do we measure?OUTCOMES • The result, effect, or consequence that will occur from carrying out a program or activity related to a goal • Must be quantitative • May not be achievable during the funding period • Examples: reduced occurrence of disease, fewer incidents

  9. Levels of Outcomes • Short-Term • Most direct and measurable • 1 to 3 years • Intermediate • Less measurable • 4 to 6 years • Long-Term • Difficult to measure impacts • 7 to 10 years

  10. How do we measure?EFFICIENCY • Ratio of outputs to cost • Cost can be dollars or time • Examples: cost per purchase order transaction, cost per seminar conducted

  11. Task Groups FOCUS: developing outcome and efficiency in specific areas ESA Water Quality Worker Safety Food Safety SAI PESP ??? ??? Framework for Action in OPP Senior Level Steering Committee FOCUS: Set Direction; Manage Process; Resolve conflicts/issues Coordinating Committee FOCUS: developing outcome and efficiency measures for MISSION AREAS; coordinating work of task groups

  12. Process highlights… • Inclusive – HQ, Regions, States, Tribes, Stakeholders • Performance measures will serve as an important management tool • Very tight timeframe

  13. Products expected from process…

  14. What’s a Logic Model? • A systematic and visual way to develop and present the causal links between the: • resources available to operate a program • activities conducted with those resources • products or services produced by the activities • intended changes or results

  15. Why the Logic Model? • Simple to understand and use • Links budget to goals • Helps to identify what to measure • Communication tool • Endorsed by National Grants Office as a way to address EPA Order 5700.1 • Endorsed by OMB (conference website)

  16. Logic Model Template

  17. VALUE Meaningful Outcomes Beans Understandable Clear Complex Useful Sliced bread File 13 BURDEN # Measures Few Many Collecting Difficulty Simple Hard Data System Cost Low High Expertise required User-friendly Geeks Criteria for Good Measures

  18. Performance Measures Quadrant Analysis Low OUTCOME NIRVANA Burden OUTPUT HELL High High Low Value

  19. Example of a good measure…. • From OMB’s website • Efficiency measure: Percent reduction in review time for registration of conventional pesticides

  20. Why is this a good measure? • Properly assists the program in improving its administrative efficiency • Important to stakeholders • Reduction in time, taking into account various steps in the process, is a valuable method for improving efficiency and potentially cost effectiveness

  21. WHY do we care? Because… • As public servants, we must assume responsibility • We are always searching for the highest quality public service at the lowest cost • We want to use whatever information is available to improve programs • Remembering that we are the trustees for the public’s monies

  22. WHY do we care? Because… Meaningful Accountability = Good Management = Good Government

More Related