1 / 12

Network Effects And Essential Facilities

Network Effects And Essential Facilities. The University of Oxford Centre for Competition Law and Policy 20 February 2006 CCLP (S). 03/06. Donald I. Baker Baker & Miller PLLC Washington, DC. Why Networks Generate So Many Competitive Issues and Conflicts.

giona
Download Presentation

Network Effects And Essential Facilities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Network Effects And Essential Facilities The University of Oxford Centre for Competition Law and Policy 20 February 2006 CCLP (S). 03/06 Donald I. Baker Baker & Miller PLLC Washington, DC

  2. Why Networks Generate So Many Competitive Issues and Conflicts • Increasing importance in a global economy • Source of potentially increased competition • Source of monopoly power • Traffic interchange as a competitive issue • Strong incentives for vertically integrated enterprises to try to disadvantage unintegrated competitors • Competitive imbalances among users • Joint venture networks

  3. Different Types of Networks • Wholesale Interchange Networks (e.g., Visa, London Stock Exchange, Railtrack). This category generates the most antitrust network problems. • End-User Networks (e.g., AOL, Vodafone, local cable and telephone networks) • Captive Networks (e.g., American Express)

  4. Sources of Market Power in “Network Interchange” Markets • “Network Effects” • Natural Monopoly Characteristics • Barriers to Alternative Network Entry on an effective scale • Strong Product Differentiation (e.g., MasterCard)

  5. Vertical Integration as Key Factor in Generating Antitrust Issues for Wholesale Interchange Networks • Costs and operational effects of network restraints • Vertically integrated competitors’ incentives • Potential conflict issues—rates, technical interconnection standards, eligibility rules, etc. • Independent network operator often will have different incentives (see Stena Sealink)

  6. Different Types of Interchange Network Antitrust Issues • Switching fees • Exclusivity, bypass and routing rules • Technical standards • Interchange fees • Network membership eligibility rules • Interconnection rates and terms • Access for User Market participants

  7. The Basic Elements in the “Essential Facilities” Doctrine • Concept– tailored application of refusal to deal rules • Essentiality • Technological and economic feasibility • Lack of business justification

  8. The “Essential Facilities” Doctrine Raises Some Especially Difficult Policy Issues • A fundamental long-run, short-run conflict • The “essential facilities” doctrine is driven by shorter-run frustration about loss of competition in the User Market • Types of relevant “facilities” include purely physical facilities, data bases, and networks (which are a combination of facilities, interconnections and rules) • Risk of discouraging investment and innovation

  9. Possible Factors to Weigh in Making an “Essential Facilities” Determination • Public franchise or subsidy as the source of the “facility” • Investment and risk in establishing the “facility” • Non-investment (i.e., “facility” is a by-product). E.g. Magill • Size of “facility” in relation to the potential size of the dependent user market • Independent operator test • Net balancing

  10. Treating Joint Venture Interchange Networks More Stringently than Dominant Single Firm Networks in the U.S. • Joint ventures in the U.S.—source of most U.S. “essential facilities” cases • Monopoly Networks in the U.S. • Dominant Networks in Europe—source of most E.C. “essential facilities” cases • Joint Venture Networks in Europe

  11. Different Enforcement Institutions and Philosophies as Influencing Antitrust Outcomes • The administrative antitrust enforcement system in Europe • The judicial-centered antitrust enforcement system in the U.S. • Judicial reluctance about making “regulatory” decisions in the U.S. • Administrative agencies may be substantially more willing to make “regulatory” findings and engage in ongoing supervision

  12. Conclusions • Differences in approach and willingness to impose “essential facilities” remedies • Potential importance of private litigation • Potential forum shopping by complainants and plaintiffs

More Related