E N D
3. All NICU nurses in an upper Midwestern state were invited to participate in this study (N=167).
Participants in this study were randomly chosen from health care units located in the upper Midwest of the United States.
4. All NICU nurses in an upper Midwestern state were invited to participate in this study (N=167).
Participants in this study were randomly chosen from health care units located in the upper Midwest of the United States.
5. All NICU nurses in an upper Midwestern state were invited to participate in this study (N=167).
Participants in this study were randomly chosen from health care units located in the upper Midwest of the United States.
13. Value of flow diagrams in reports of randomized controlled trials JAMA 2001;285: 1996–1999
16. The METHODS Purpose: to describe how you collected, organized and analyzed the data
Describe what you did, not what you found (Results)
Respect chronology
Describe original methods in detail; otherwise give references.
(length varies depending on originality of methods used)
17. The METHODS Purpose: to describe how you collected, organized and analyzed the data (that are relevant to the purpose of the study)
Clearly present and define all analysis variables.
Organize into logical subsections that illustrate the steps you took to collect, organize and analyze the data.
Describe what you did, not what you found (Results)
Respect chronology
Describe original methods in detail; otherwise give references.
(length varies depending on originality of methods used)
20. If we read references 16-20, what can we expect to learn about the analysis variables?
how to measure/interpret “agreement”?
how to measure/interpret “reliability”?
whether reliability and agreement mean the same thing?
how Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients are used to measure “agreement”?
21. The METHODS Purpose: to describe how you collected, organized and analyzed the data (that are relevant to the purpose of the study)
Clearly present and define all analysis variables.
Organize into logical subsections that illustrate the steps you took to collect, organize and analyze the data.
22. Examples of Subsection Headings Study population
How many subjects were eligible (eligibilty criteria)
How many declined to participate (and why)
How many participated
How many dropped out
Sampling methods
Laboratory methods
Epidemiologic investigation
Baseline data collection
Diagnostic Evaluation
Intervention
Follow-up
Definition of variables
Exposure variables
Outcome variables
Case definition
Statistical analysis
23. Risk Factors for Invasive Pneumococcal Disease among Navajo Adults METHODS
Setting and Case Ascertainment
Participants
Data Collection
Definitions of Study Variables
Statistical Analysis
Ethical Considerations
24. Soft Drink Consumption and Risk of DevelopingCardiometabolic Risk Factors and the Metabolic Syndromein Middle-Aged Adults in the Community METHODS
Study Sample
Measurement of Covariates
Assessment of Soft Drink Consumption and Dietary Intake of Other Foods
Definition and Components of the Metabolic Syndrome
Statistical Analyses
Soft Drink Consumption and Prevalence of the Metabolic Syndrome
Soft Drink Consumption and Incidence of the Metabolic Syndrome
Incidence of Individual Components of Components of the Metabolic Syndrome
25. METHODS
Participants
Intervention
Process and Outcome Measures
Statistical Analysis
26. METHODS
Participants
Intervention
Process and Outcome Measures
Diet and Physical Activity Data
Anthropometric Data
Metabolic Measures
Statistical Analysis
28. The METHODS Purpose: to describe how you collected, organized and analyzed the data
Clearly present and define all analysis variables.
Organize into logical subsections that illustrate the steps you took to collect, organize and analyze the data.
Describe what you did, not what you found (Results)
Respect chronology
Describe original methods in detail; otherwise give references.
(length varies depending on originality of methods used)
29. Health Perceptions and Survival: Do Global Evaluations of Health Status Really Predict Mortality? Methods (excerpt)
. . . . A total of 624 deaths occurred in the four years, 334 among the 1,166 men (28.6%) and 290 among the 1,646 women (17.6%). Because these mortality rates were quite different, all analyses were performed separately by sex.
Because sex-specific death rates were unequal (male = 28.6%, female = 17.6%), all analyses were performed separately by sex.
Idler EL, Kasl S. J Gerontol 991;46(2):S55-65