1 / 15

Income and non-wage benefits from employment

Income and non-wage benefits from employment. Task Force on Measurement of Quality of Employment Paris, June 12 and 13. It may be obvious but…. A survey of 2,500 Canadians 1 : 6 in 10 said good pay was “very important” in a job Over half said benefits were “very important”

graciem
Download Presentation

Income and non-wage benefits from employment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Income and non-wage benefits from employment Task Force on Measurement of Quality of Employment Paris, June 12 and 13

  2. It may be obvious but… A survey of 2,500 Canadians1: • 6 in 10 said good pay was “very important” in a job • Over half said benefits were “very important” • Pay and benefits among most significant “job quality deficits” 1Changing Employment Relationships Survey, Canadian Policy Research Networks

  3. Income from employment indicators: Evaluated: • Share of employed working below ½ median hourly earnings • Share of employees paid at or below the minimum wage Proposed: • Average wages • Distribution of wages by quintile

  4. Results of indicator evaluation Share of employed working below ½ median hourly earnings • Useful • Strength in providing simple relative measure • Too simple? Should there be an age cut-off? Should household-level be considered?

  5. Results of indicator evaluation Share of employees paid at or below minimum wage • Useful, simple measure • Too simple? Should there be an age cut-off? • In some Canadian jurisdictions, minimum wages set very, very low, so very few people in this indicator (0.7% in Alberta) • Duplicative?

  6. Share earning minimum wage or less

  7. Results of indicator evaluation Average wages of employees • Felt that there was a need to go beyond relative measurement – what are people actually making? • Should household-level be considered? • How to make international or inter-regional comparisons, given regional living cost differences?

  8. Average wage growth relative to prices

  9. Results of indicator evaluation Distribution of wages by quintile • Felt that there was a need for more sophisticated measurement or relative earnings • Comparing top quintile to bottom would allow wage polarization analysis • Too complicated?

  10. Fastest wage growth among the best paid 1/5 of employees

  11. Non-wage benefits from employment indicators: Evaluated: • Share of employees entitled to paid annual leave • Average length of paid annual leave Proposed: • Share of employees receiving supplemental medical insurance

  12. Results of indicator evaluation Share of employees entitled to paid annual leave • Perhaps the most important “non-wage benefit”, so very relevant • Entitlement data needs to be combined with estimates based on actual behaviour (next indicator)

  13. Results of indicator evaluation Average length of paid annual leave • Perhaps the most important “non-wage benefit”, so very relevant • Supplement to entitlement data

  14. Entitlement and use of annual paid leave

  15. Income and non-wage benefits from employment What do you think??

More Related