1 / 14

Mahonia Commodity Prepay Restructuring Proposal

Mahonia Commodity Prepay Restructuring Proposal. 7/17/2000. Restructure Overview. Existing forward sale agreements are based on prices significantly lower than current market Posting margin against the forward sale and the financial swap will tie up significant capital

Download Presentation

Mahonia Commodity Prepay Restructuring Proposal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mahonia Commodity Prepay Restructuring Proposal 7/17/2000

  2. Restructure Overview • Existing forward sale agreements are based on prices significantly lower than current market • Posting margin against the forward sale and the financial swap will tie up significant capital • Chase wants to rebook physical forward under new physical master agreement • Restructure existing agreements by: • Amending forward sale agreement to revise the volumes due, and pay the market value of the volumes removed from the agreement • Terminate and cash settle existing financial and physical hedges with Chase • Execute new financial and physical hedges under existing and new master agreements • Obtain letters of consent from surety bond providers acknowledging the change in the structure of the forward sale agreements • Zero P&L effect Forward Sale Mahonia Prepay $ Volumes Fixed $ Enron Chase Index $ Financial Swap Index $ Volumes Chase Physical forward

  3. P&L effects • Basic prepay structure hedges price movement of a physically delivered cash flow with a financial contract • Cash delivered under the financial contract occurs 5 days after the beginning of the month; the physical contract cash settles 55 days after the first of the month • When market prices are equal to the financial hedge strike price, the financial swap pays nothing and all cash flows are settled on day 55 • When market prices increase, Chase pays Enron the difference between the market price and the strike price on day 5 under the financial hedge • Enron doesn’t return that money until day 55, when the cash is delivered under the physical settlement • Therefore, Enron has been booking earnings on the 50 days of “float” while market prices have been rising over contract strike prices • The value of the financial contract is defined to be greater than the value of the physical contract assuming that the time value of money is positive • The difference between the cash value of the financial contract and the cash value of the physical contract is really a cash settlement of earnings that were made on a mark-to-market basis as the financial and physical contracts were revalued during the market price increase • If prices had decreased, this gain would have been a loss

  4. Restructuring Proposals • 6 prepays are currently outstanding with Chase • Sep-95 $225MM - Natural Gas • This prepay will expire in Sep-00 and therefore is not proposed to be restructured • Dec-97 $300MM - Natural Gas • Jun-98 $250MM - Natural Gas • Dec-98 $250MM - Crude Oil • Jun-99 $500MM - Natural Gas • Jun-00 $650MM - Natural Gas • This prepay was recently executed and therefore is not proposed to be restructured • Basic prepay restructure strategy • Reduce volumes required to be delivered under the forward sale agreement • Increase fixed prices in the financial hedge so that periodic cashflows are nearly the same as under the previous arrangement • Given similar periodic fixed cash flows, the outstanding prepayment obligation will amortize similarly without requiring alteration to the fixed/floating interest rate hedges

  5. December ‘97 $300MM • Balances as of July 31, 2000 • Existing forward sale volumes • Transco Sta. 65 45,000 MMBtu/d • TGT/SL 40,000 MMBtu/d • Columbia Gulf La. 30,000 MMBtu/d • Forward sale remaining volumes MTM value: $(218,596,625) • Existing financial hedge fixed prices • Transco Sta. 65 $2.2244/MMBtu • TGT/SL $2.1794/MMBtu • Columbia Gulf La. $2.1394/MMBtu • Financial hedge MTM value: $96,211,925 • Existing daily cash flow: $251,456.00 • Restructure existing forward sale agreement by: • Proposed volumes would be: • Transco Sta. 65: 26,000 MMBtu/d • TGT/SL: 17,000 MMBtu/d • Columbia Gulf La.: 22,000 MMBtu/d • Margin reference price would be: $3.898/MMBtu on 65,000 MMBtu/d • Applicable delivery dates would be: August, 2000 through December, 2001 • Value of the volumes removed from the FSA: $95,032,291

  6. December ‘97 $300MM (con’t) • Restructure financial and physical hedges by: • Existing hedges would be terminated • New financial hedge proposed volumes and prices would be: • Transco Sta. 65: 26,000 MMBtu/d @ $3.8500/MMBtu • TGT/SL: 17,000 MMBtu/d @ $3.7755/MMBtu • Columbia Gulf La.: 22,000 MMBtu/d @ $3.9626/MMBtu • New physical hedge would be struck under new physical master with Chase • Applicable delivery dates: August, 2000 through December, 2001 • Value of the proposed financial hedge: $520,650 • Restructured daily cash flow: $251,456.30 • Transaction steps: • Enron restructures forward sale agreement with Mahonia, reducing volumes to be delivered according to the above proposal - in consideration, Enron would wire to Mahonia $95,032,291.00 • The financial and physical hedges between Enron and Chase would be terminated - in consideration, Chase would wire to Enron $95,691,275.00 • Enron and Chase would enter into new financial and physical hedges at the proposed volume and prices • The surety companies would provide a letter of consent agreeing to the amendments to the original transaction. Supporting letters of credit would remain in effect unchanged.

  7. June ‘98 $250MM • Balances as of July 31, 2000 • Existing forward sale volumes • Transco Sta. 65 40,000 MMBtu/d • TGT/SL 25,000 MMBtu/d • Columbia Gulf La. 25,000 MMBtu/d • Forward sale remaining volumes MTM value: $(220,941,369) • Existing financial hedge fixed prices • Transco Sta. 65 $2.35065/MMBtu • TGT/SL $2.30065/MMBtu • Columbia Gulf La. $2.25315/MMBtu • Financial hedge MTM value: $86,607,756 • Existing daily cash flow: $207,871.00 • Restructure existing forward sale agreement by: • Proposed volumes would be: • Transco Sta. 65: 25,000 MMBtu/d • TGT/SL: 15,000 MMBtu/d • Columbia Gulf La.: 15,000 MMBtu/d • Margin reference price would be: $3.79/MMBtu on 55,000 MMBtu/d • Applicable delivery dates: August, 2000 through June, 2002 • Value of the volumes removed from the FSA: $85,908,953

  8. June ‘98 $250MM (con’t) • Restructure financial and physical hedges by: • Existing hedges would be terminated • New financial hedge proposed volumes and prices would be: • Transco Sta. 65: 25,000 MMBtu/d @ $3.7610/MMBtu • TGT/SL: 15,000 MMBtu/d @ $3.7553/MMBtu • Columbia Gulf La.: 15,000 MMBtu/d @ $3.8345/MMBtu • New physical hedge would be struck under new physical master with Chase • Margin reference price: $3.79/MMBtu on 55,000 MMBtu/d • Applicable delivery dates: August, 2000 through June, 2002 • Value of the proposed financial hedge: $109,586 • Restructured daily cash flow would be: $207,872.00 • Transaction steps: • Enron restructures forward sale agreement with Mahonia, reducing volumes to be delivered according to the above proposal - in consideration, Enron would wire to Mahonia $85,908,953.00 • The financial and physical hedges between Enron and Chase would be terminated - in consideration, Chase would wire to Enron $86,498,070.00 • Enron and Chase would enter into new financial and physical hedges at the proposed volume and prices • The surety companies would provide a letter of consent agreeing to the amendments to the original transaction.

  9. December ‘98 $250MM • Balances as of July 31, 2000 • Existing forward sale volumes • ARCO Cushing 391,000 Bbl/month • Forward sale remaining volumes MTM value: $(269,651,460) • Existing financial hedge fixed prices • ARCO Cushing $16.08/Bbl • Financial hedge MTM value: $103,730,044 • Existing monthly cash flow: $6,287,280.00 • Restructure existing forward sale agreement by: • Proposed volumes and prices (delivery point is ARCO Cushing): • Aug-00 to Jul-01: 222,000 Bbl/mo @ $28.33/Bbl • Jul-01 to Dec-02: 260,000 Bbl/mo @ $24.19/Bbl • Margin reference price: Same as above • Applicable delivery dates would be: August, 2000 through December, 2002 • Value of the volumes removed from the FSA: $102,393,904

  10. December ‘98 $250MM (con’t) • Restructure financial and physical hedges by: • Existing hedges woul be terminated • New financial hedge proposed volumes and prices (delivery point is ARCO Cushing): • Aug-00 to Jul-01: 222,000 Bbl/mo @ $28.33/Bbl • Jul-01 to Dec-02: 260,000 Bbl/mo @ $24.19/Bbl • Physical hedge would be struck under new physical master with Chase • Margin reference price: Same as above • Value of the proposed financial hedge: $287,398 • Restructured monthly cash flow: $6,287,450.00 • Transaction steps: • Enron restructures forward sale agreement with Mahonia, reducing volumes to be delivered according to the above proposal - in consideration, Enron would wire to Mahonia $102,393,904.00 • The financial and physical hedges between Enron and Chase would be terminated - in consideration, Chase would wire to Enron $103,442,646.00 • Enron and Chase would enter into new financial and physical hedges at the proposed volume and prices • The surety companies would provide a letter of consent agreeing to the amendments to the original transaction.

  11. June ‘99 $500MM • Balances as of July 31, 2000 • Existing forward sale volumes • Transco Sta. 65 50,000 MMBtu/d • TGT/SL 50,000 MMBtu/d • Columbia Gulf La. 40,000 MMBtu/d • Forward sale remaining volumes MTM value: $(606,701,479) • Existing financial hedge fixed prices • Transco Sta. 65 $2.4862/MMBtu • TGT/SL $2.4612/MMBtu • Columbia Gulf La. $2.4623/MMBtu • Financial hedge MTM value:$179,018,630 • Existing daily cash flow: $345,862.00 • Restructure existing forward sale agreement by: • Proposed volumes would be: Transco Sta. 65 TGT/SL Columbia Gulf La. • Aug-00 to Jul-01 31,000 MMBtu/d 25,000 MMBtu/d 31,000 MMBtu/d • Aug-01 to Jul-02 35,000 MMBtu/d 28,000 MMBtu/d 35,000 MMBtu/d • Aug-02 to Jul-03 41,000 MMBtu/d 31,000 MMBtu/d 41,000 MMBtu/d • Aug-04 to Jun-04 44,000 MMBtu/d 35,000 MMBtu/d 44,000 MMBtu/d

  12. June ‘99 $500MM (con’t) • Proposed margin reference prices would be: • Aug-00 to Jul-01 $3.9888/MMBtu on 87,000 MMBtu/d • Aug-01 to Jul-02 $3.5385/MMBtu on 98,000 MMBtu/d • Aug-02 to Jul-03 $3.2285/MMBtu on 113,000 MMBtu/d • Aug-04 to Jun-04 $3.1509/MMBtu on 123,000 MMBtu/d • Value of the volumes removed: $179,526,085 • Restructure financial and physical hedges by: • Existing hedges would be terminated • New financial hedge proposed prices on the restructured volumes would be: Transco Sta. 65 TGT/SL Columbia Gulf La. • Aug-00 to Jul-01 $4.0100/MMBtu $3.9397/MMBtu $3.9697/MMBtu • Aug-01 to Jul-02 $3.5518/MMBtu $3.5176/MMBtu $3.5160/MMBtu • Aug-02 to Jul-03 $3.2714/MMBtu $3.1772/MMBtu $3.2385/MMBtu • Aug-04 to Jun-04 $3.1875/MMBtu $3.1772/MMBtu $3.1554/MMBtu • New physical hedge would be struck under new physical master with Chase • Restructured daily cash flow: $345,866.14 • Transaction steps: • Enron restructures forward sale agreement with Mahonia, reducing volumes to be delivered according to the above proposal - in consideration, Enron would wire to Mahonia $179,526,085.00

  13. June ‘99 $500MM (con’t) • Transaction steps (con’t) • The financial and physical hedges between Enron and Chase would be terminated - in consideration, Chase would wire to Enron $180,753,564.00 • Enron and Chase would enter into new financial and physical hedges at the proposed volume and prices • The surety companies would provide a letter of consent agreeing to the amendments to the original transaction.

  14. Action steps • Confirm prices and volumes are acceptable for each restructure (Chase) • Confirm that restructures are acceptable to Sureties (Enron) • Prepare documents (Enron, V&E) • Document review (Enron, Chase) • Trade execution & wire transfers (Enron/Chase/Mahonia)

More Related