1 / 27

Multi-objective analysis to control ozone exposure

Multi-objective analysis to control ozone exposure. C. Carnevale, G. Finzi, E. Pisoni, M. Volta Dipartimento di Elettronica per l’Automazione Università degli Studi di Brescia, Italy. Research aim. To develop a secondary pollution control plan: Multi-objective optimization:

gudrun
Download Presentation

Multi-objective analysis to control ozone exposure

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Multi-objective analysis to control ozone exposure C. Carnevale, G. Finzi, E. Pisoni, M. Volta Dipartimento di Elettronica per l’Automazione Università degli Studi di Brescia, Italy

  2. Research aim To develop a secondary pollution control plan: • Multi-objective optimization: • Objective 1: Air Quality Index (AQI) • Objective 2: Internal Costs (C) • Objective 2: External Costs (ExC) • for a mesoscale domain • Milan CityDelta domain (Northern Italy)

  3. Problem formulation: objective 1 the Air Quality Indicator (AQI) daily cell NOx and VOC emissions in the reference case for CORINAIR sector s; decision variable set: CORINAIR sector precursor emission reductions;

  4. Problem formulation : objective 2 the emission reduction cost (C) unit costs related respectively to NOx and VOC emission reduction; decision variable set: CORINAIR sector precursor emission reductions;

  5. Study domain 300x300km2 Milan domain

  6. AQI model identification • Pollutant concentration are computed by 3D deterministic chemical transport multiphase modelling system • Time consuming • Identification of source-receptor models (Neural Networks), describing the nonlinear relation between decision variables (emission reduction) and air quality objective, processing the simulations of TCAM

  7. Shell Core TCAM model • Gas phase chemical mechanisms: SAPRC90, SAPRC97, COCOH97, CBIV • 21 aerosol chemical species • 10 Size classes • Size varying during the simulation • Fixed-Moving approach • Processes involved: • Condensation/Evaporation • Nucleation • Aqueous Chemistry

  8. TCAM simulations • base case simulation: • 300 x 300 km2, 60 x 60 cells, cell resolution: 5x5 km2 • 11 vertical layers • emission and meteorological fields: JRC (CityDelta Project) • initial and boundary conditions: EMEP • the run of such a simulation takes about 12 days of CPU time • simulation period: 1999 april to september • alternative scenario simulations: • CLE: current legislation • MFR: most feasible reduction

  9. Source-receptor models (NN) • Elman NN architecture: • Nodes of input layer: 2 • Nodes of output layer: 1 • Nodes of hidden layer: 8 • One neural network for each group of 2x2 (10x10 km2) domain cells • Input data: daily NOx and VOC emissions • Target data: cell AOT40 daily values computed by the GAMES system

  10. Source-receptor models (NN) • Identification and validation dataset: • 3 TCAM seasonal simulations • Base Case; • Current LEgislation; • Most Feasible Reduction. • Validation dataset (126 values): • Third week of each month. • Identification dataset (423 values): • Remaining patterns

  11. Source-receptor models (NN) NBIAS r=0.97

  12. Cost functions • Cost curves used are estimated on the basis of RAINS-IIASA database (http://www.iiasa.ac.at) • An emission reduction cost curve has been assessed for each CORINAIR sector. • Decision variables = emission reduction for sectors: • VOC: 2, 3, 4 ,5, 6, 7, 8, 9 • NOx: 2, 3, 4, 7, 8

  13. Cost functions • Fitting the costs of the available technologies: • considering 2nd order polynomial functions • with the constraint of estimating a monotonically increasing and convex function. NOx, sector 3:

  14. Optimization problem solution • Weighted Sum Method • Constraints • Maximum Feasible Reductions 2. Technologies reducing both precursors

  15. Results • Pareto boundaries Utopia

  16. Results NOx reductions VOC reductions

  17. Results VOC emissions NOx emissions

  18. Conclusions • A procedure to formulate a multi-objective analysis to control ozone exposure has been presented • The procedure implements Elman neural networks tuned by the outputs of a deterministic 3D modelling system • The methodology has been applied over Milan CityDelta domain (Northern Italy): a strong reduction of ozone exposure (60% of the maximum air quality improvement) can be attained with a small fraction of the emission reduction technology costs (about 12%)

  19. Current activities • Uncertainty analysis: • Source-receptor models • Cost curves • VOC/NOx reduction functions for transport sectors • CityDeltaIII simulations to extend source-receptor model calibration and validation sets; • source-receptor models for SOMO35,AOT60, max8h, mean PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations; • PM10 and PM2.5 precursor (NOx, VOC, primary PM10, NH3, SO2) cost curves; • PM10 and PM2.5 two-objective optimization

  20. Thanks to… • This research has been partially supported by MIUR (Italian Ministry of University and Research). • The authors are grateful to the CityDelta community. • The work has been developed in the frame of NoE ACCENT.

  21. References • Finzi, G., Guariso, G., 1992. Optimal air pollution control strategies: a case study. Ecological Modelling 64, 221–239. • Barazzetta, S., Corani, G., Guariso, G., 2002. A neural emission-receptor model for ozone reduction planning. In: Proc. iEMSs 2002. • Volta, M. 2003. Neuro-fuzzy models for air quality planing. The case study of ozone in Northern Italy. European Control Conference. • Guariso, G., Pirovano, G., Volta, M., 2004. Multi-objective analysis of ground level ozone concentration control. Journal of Environmental Management 71, 25–33. • Carnevale C., Finzi G., Pisoni E., Volta M., 2006. Identification of source-receptor models for secondary tropospheric pollution control. 14th IFAC Symposium on System Identification. 29-31 march, 2006 (pp. 762-767). IFAC Ed., CDROM published by Causal Productions. • M Carnevale C., Finzi G., Pisoni E., Volta M., 2006. Multi-objective analysis to control ozone exposure, 28th ITM-NATO.

  22. Constraints • Maximum feasible reductions allowed by technologies for macrosector s: • Technologies reducing both NOx and VOC emissions

  23. Optimization problem solution Constraints (2): technologies reducing both precursors macrosector 8 macrosector 7 VOC reduction VOC reduction NOx reduction] NOx reduction

  24. Utopia A scenario A

  25. basecase emission scenario NOx emissions VOC emissions

  26. AOT40 scenarios source-receptor model simulations basecase Scenario A ppb*h

  27. control priorities 2 3 2 1 1 3 2 2 emission reductions (ton/year) 1 1 scenario A: emissions

More Related