1 / 23

2012 Faculty Satisfaction Survey

2012 Faculty Satisfaction Survey. Overview and Results. Faculty Satisfaction Survey—Fast Facts. Survey administered periodically; since 2006, every two years (October-November) Current survey developed internally (in 2006); no external benchmarks

guy
Download Presentation

2012 Faculty Satisfaction Survey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2012 Faculty Satisfaction Survey Overview and Results

  2. Faculty Satisfaction Survey—Fast Facts • Survey administered periodically; since 2006, every two years (October-November) • Current survey developed internally (in 2006); no external benchmarks • Office of Faculty Affairs and UMHS Quality Improvement work together to design, maintain, administer survey, and to analyze, compile, and report results.

  3. Survey Administration • Data collection online using Qualtrics survey platform • Survey is anonymous • Within survey, faculty self-classify themselves by their: • Clinical Department (and division for larger departments) • Current Status • ACU, if clinical • Other Demographics

  4. General Survey Design • Survey is “modular” in design: • Some common questions for all faculty • Some exclusive questions limited to clinical and research activities, based on faculty self-identification

  5. General Survey Topics Rated • Leadership (Dean’s Office, Department Chairs, Division Chiefs, Administrators) • Colleagues (respect and support) • Satisfaction with clinical practice (modular) • Satisfaction with research-related activities (modular) • Teaching, organizational service experiences • Mentorship, career management, work-life balance • Awareness of salary/benefits competitiveness • Overall job satisfaction, self-reported measures of likelihood of retention

  6. Overview of Results * Significant Decline

  7. Overview of Results * Significant Decline

  8. Significant Changes: 2010 to 2012

  9. Faculty Involved with Clinical Activities

  10. Measures Related to Clinical Practice Show Improvement * Significant Decline

  11. Faculty Involved with Research Activities

  12. Measures Related to Research Show Improvement * Significant Increase

  13. Communication Preferences: In the Last 30 Days, Did You Read:

  14. Questions that Best Predict Overall Satisfaction (Based on Data) • My department chair addresses faculty concerns • I am satisfied with how I am being mentored • My department chair sets reasonable expectations • My department chair advocates for my career growth • My department chair provides appropriate leadership

  15. Factors Influencing Overall Job Satisfaction • Existence of Mentor (formally or informally): • 71.5% of valid responses were “yes” • Overall job satisfaction: 73.9 • 28.5% of valid responses were “no” • Overall job satisfaction: 58.2 • Difference: 15.7 points; a statistically significant difference • (126 respondents did not answer the question)

  16. Distribution of Faculty by Track (Self-Reported)

  17. Differences Between Tracks • Overall Job Satisfaction (clinical track lower) • Career Management and Mentorship (instructional track higher, research track lower • Colleagues and Collaboration (instructional track higher, clinical and research tracks lower)

  18. Differences Between Tracks (Cont.) • Compensation (Instructional track higher than research track, which is higher than clinical track) • Future Intentions (instructional and clinical tracks higher than research track) • Leadership (instructional, lecturer/clinical lecturer tracks higher than others)

  19. Differences Between Tracks (Cont.) • Patient Care and Clinical Activities (lecturer/clinical lecturer track higher than others) • Research activities (clinical tracks lower than others) • Satisfaction with mentoring (clinical track low)

  20. Differences Between Tracks (Cont.) • Teaching and Organizational Service (instructional track higher, research track lower) • Work-life balance (instructional track higher, clinical track low, research track in the middle)

  21. Distribution of Results • Distribution of Results is coordinated through the Office of Faculty Affairs

  22. Clinical Activities by Track

  23. Research Activities by Track

More Related