1 / 30

Review of EMC regional ensembles: SREF, NARRE-TL, HRRRE-TL/HREF

Review of EMC regional ensembles: SREF, NARRE-TL, HRRRE-TL/HREF. Jun Du, Geoff DiMego, Binbin Zhou, Dusan Jovic, Bo Yang, Matt Pyle, Geoff Manikin, Brad Ferrier, Stan Benjamin (GSD) and Brian Etherton (DET) Acknowledgements: Ensemble Team : Yuejian Zhu, Yan Luo and Bo Cui

haines
Download Presentation

Review of EMC regional ensembles: SREF, NARRE-TL, HRRRE-TL/HREF

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Review of EMC regional ensembles: SREF, NARRE-TL, HRRRE-TL/HREF Jun Du, Geoff DiMego, Binbin Zhou, Dusan Jovic, Bo Yang, Matt Pyle, Geoff Manikin, Brad Ferrier, Stan Benjamin (GSD) and Brian Etherton (DET) Acknowledgements: Ensemble Team: Yuejian Zhu, Yan Luo and Bo Cui Mesoscale Branch: Eric Rogers, Perry Shafran and Ying Lin DTC/NCAR: Jamie Wolff AWC: David Bright HPC: Dave Novak IBM: James Abeles

  2. Content • 2011 implementations • Coming implementations • Plans

  3. 2011 implementations • Added North American domain (221 grid) SREF data on NOMADS • Added CONUS domain (212 grid) bias corrected SREF data on NOMADS • Added 4km HREF ensemble products (combining 32km SREF with 4km Hires Window runs, Du 2004)

  4. Examples of HREF

  5. HREF ensemble products (7 surface and 7 upper air variables)

  6. Coming implementations • ~January 2012: NARRE-TL (North America Rapid Refresh Ensemble – Time Lagged) • ~April 2012: SREF (Short Range Ensemble Forecast)

  7. NARRE-TL (formerly VSREF) -Together with the implementation of Rapid Refresh (RR) to replace RUC (Stan Benjamin’s review). -Background: NCEP and GSD agreement: to implement a “3 WRF-ARW and 3 WRF-NMMB members, hourly-updated N.A. RR Ensemble (6 member NARRE)” -Before having enough computing resource to operationally run the “6-member NARRE”, build a Time-lagged NARRE system (NARRE-TL) based on single runs from RR and NAM as a first step to (1) Fully utilize existing hourly output RR data; (2) Provide probabilistic guidance to aviation weather (similar to the idea of SPC’s “Probability of Opportunity”); (3) use only very low compute resource (post processing); and (4) Provide a baseline to future real NARRE/HRRRE development and evaluation.

  8. NARRE-TL Configuration 10 weighted time-lagged members collected from: 6 RR members and 4 NAM members (next slide) Two output grids: CONUS (grid#130) Alaska (grid#242) Forecast hours: 12 hours Model resolution 12km NARRE-TL Alaska, ( grid#242 ) NARRE-TL (grid#130) RR model domain

  9. Member Weighting= 1 - forecast age (hr)/30: 1.0 for the most current forecast and 0.0 for 30hr-old fcst (NAM always older than RR  gives more weight to RR members) RR’s first 6 hr forecasts are used. Example for 06Z cycle’s NARRE-TL members: RR NAM 06 12 18 21 00 03 06 09 12 15 18 21 00 6hr TL 12hr FCST

  10. Example products from NARRE-TL (may need a spatial filtering/GSD) Icing Turbulence LLWS Visibility

  11. Importance to user community • Subject: VSREF missing • From: xxx.xxx@noaa.gov • Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 10:29:59 -0700 • To: Jun.Du@noaa.gov Jun, Are you guys having troubles with the VSREF data? We have not received anything since 12/05 at 09Z. Thanks.

  12. Coming SREF upgrade (Spring 2012) • Model Change 1. Model adjustment (eliminate Eta and RSM two models and add new NEMS-based NMMB model) 2. Model upgrade (two existing WRF cores from v2.2 to version 3.3) 3. Resolution increase (from 32km/35km to 16km/17km) • IC diversity improvement 1. More control ICs (NDAS for NMMB, GFS for NMM, and RR blended with GFS for ARW) 2. More IC perturbation diversity (regional bleeding, downscaled ETR and blended between the two) 3. Diversity in land surface initial states (NDAS, GFS, and RR) • Physics diversity improvement 1. More diversity of physics schemes (NAM, GFS, HWRF, NCAR and RR) • New capabilities of post-processing 1. precipitation bias correction (individual members and ensemble mean) 2. clustering and associated mean/prob/spread within a cluster 3. member performance ranking (different weights for different members) 4. downscaling to 5km using RTMA (same as NAEFS, evaluated by DET for SREF) • New ensemble products 1. max/min, mode, 10-25-50-75-90% forecasts (similar to NAEFS) 2. probs of severe thunderstorm, lightning, dry lightning and fire weather (SPC) 3. addition of hourly ensemble product output from 1-39hr

  13. Evaluation of SLP (opl SREF vs. par SREF, Oct. 23 – Nov. 26, 2011) Ens mean fcst: RMSE Ens spread: Rank Histogram Prob fcst: RPSS (12km NAM as ref) Prob fcst: reliability diagram

  14. Evaluation of 250U (opl SREF vs. par SREF, Oct. 23 – Nov. 26, 2011) Ens mean fcst: RMSE Ens spread: Rank Histogram Prob fcst: RPSS (12km NAM as ref) Prob fcst: reliability diagram

  15. Evaluation of 500H (opl SREF vs. par SREF, Oct. 23 – Nov. 26, 2011) Ens mean fcst: RMSE Ens spread: Rank Histogram Outlier of opl SREF = 21.1% (to miss truth) Outlier of par SREF = 13.4% (to miss truth) Prob fcst: RPSS (12km NAM as ref) Prob fcst: reliability diagram

  16. Evaluation of 2mT (opl SREF vs. par SREF, Oct. 23 – Nov. 26, 2011) Ens spread: Rank Histogram Ens mean fcst: RMSE Outlier of opl SREF = 17.2% (to miss truth) Outlier of par SREF = 14.3% (to miss truth) Prob fcst: reliability diagram Prob fcst: RPSS (12km NAM as ref)

  17. Evaluation of 2mTd (opl SREF vs. par SREF, Oct. 23 – Nov. 26, 2011) Ens spread: Rank Histogram Ens mean fcst: RMSE Outlier of opl SREF = 17.8% (to miss truth) Outlier of par SREF = 12.0% (to miss truth) Prob fcst: reliability diagram Prob fcst: RPSS (12km NAM as ref)

  18. Evaluation of 10m-U (opl SREF vs. par SREF, Oct. 23 – Nov. 26, 2011) Ens mean fcst: RMSE Ens spread: Rank Histogram Outlier of opl SREF = 19.1% (to miss truth) Outlier of par SREF = 12.9% (to miss truth) Prob fcst: RPSS (12km NAM as ref) Prob fcst: reliability diagram

  19. Ensemble mean precipitation forecast: ETS of 24hr-accumulation (against CCPA, Oct. 23 – Nov. 26, 2011)

  20. Ens spread: Rank Histogram of 24hr-accumulated precipitation at F87hr (Oct. 23 – Nov. 26, 2011) Too much light precipitation at dry-end but less chance to miss heavier precipitation events at high-value end

  21. SREF mean forecasts of 24h-accumulated precipitation at F87 (21z, Nov. 18, 2011) 32km SREF mean (opl) 16km SREF mean (par)

  22. Bias correction can effectively remove over-predicted light precipitation area!(frequency-matching method similar to that used in GEFS) 16km SREF mean (raw) 16km SREF mean (bias corrected) 24

  23. Precipitation bias correction verification (against CCPA, using 12km NAM as reference for RPSS, Nov. 10-26, 2011) Ens mean fcst: areal bias (>=0.01”) Ens mean fcst: ETS (>=0.01”) Prob fcst: RPSS

  24. Clustering: 500H and SLP

  25. Clustering: 2mT and precipitation

  26. 32km SREF downscaled to 5km NDFD grid using RTMA Against RTMA Against observation

  27. Prob of thunderstorm, lightning, dry lightning , fire weather (maybe hold off because SPC needs to update a calibration table), bias corrected ensemble mean precipitation, and cluster means at official NCO web Clusters and member ranking information such as weights at ftp site Max, min, mode, 10-25-50-75-90% forecasts at ftp site (more suitable for point forecasts) Hourly ensemble products (mean, spread and prob) remain at NCEP CCS since it’s mainly for AWC who can access CCS (maybe need to convert it to Gempak) Bias corrected precipitation forecast as a new variable at NOMADS If downscaled 2.5/5km data will be available (pending at DET), it will be at ftp site for the time being Collecting new required variables from field forecasters for planning future AWIPS/AWIPS2 How to disseminate extra SREF data and products to forecasters and users?

  28. Plans for SREF SREF system: • (1) Improve IC perturbation (3D mask, EMC/DET) • (2) Explore EnKF perturbations from hybrid EnKF/GSI DA system • (3) Improve physics perturbation (stochastic parameterization physics/EMC and stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme/DET) Post-processing: • (4) Test BMA method for post processing/DET • (5) Calibrate ensemble spread • (6) Expand bias correction to North America domain (e.g., grid#221) Products: • (7) Produce SREF mean bufr sounding • (8) Build SREF model climate • (9) Explore NAEFS_LAM (combining with Canadian regional ensemble) Data: • (10) Add an ~12km output domain over NA • (11) Add new fields to AWIPS/AWIPS2 Verification: • (12) Verify ensemble mean cyclone track (Guangping Lou)

  29. Plans for HRRRE-TL Similarly to NARRE-TL, to develop a new suite of ensemble products called “HRRRE-TL (Hi-Res Rapid Refresh Ensemble – Time Lagged)” based on existing high-resolution single model runs - • 4km NAM-nest • 4km HRW-ARW • 4km HRW-NMM • 4km Matt Pyle run (for SPC) • 3km HRRR (GSD runs)

More Related