1 / 21

Introduction to ethics in medical practice

Introduction to ethics in medical practice. Anna Smajdor Lecturer in Ethics University of East Anglia a.smajdor@uea.ac.uk. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health/. What medical ethics teaching can’t do. Tell you what’s right and wrong

hallam
Download Presentation

Introduction to ethics in medical practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction to ethics in medical practice Anna Smajdor Lecturer in Ethics University of East Anglia a.smajdor@uea.ac.uk http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health/

  2. What medical ethics teaching can’t do • Tell you what’s right and wrong • but it might help you to understand ethical issues and think more deeply about them • Make you a good person • but it might help to make you a better person, and a better doctor, through thinking about and understanding ethical issues

  3. What your medical ethics teaching is for • Recognise common areas of ethical dispute in medicine • Recognise ethical beliefs & assumptions (your own and those of others) • Recognise the impact of your ethical beliefs on your practice • Be able to articulate and evaluate your ethical beliefs • Recognise and understand the ethical viewpoints that conflict with your own beliefs • Participate in the resolution of ethical conflicts that arise in practice And (pragmatic considerations) • To fulfil government requirements • To help you pass your exams

  4. The evolution of ethics Maeterlinck says ants are ethical because they are altruistic. What assumption(s) does this imply? Ants – Maurice Maeterlinck argues that ants behave ethically, because they are altruistic Can animals behave (un)ethically? • fthat ‘altruistic’ equals ‘ethical’ • that ants can choose to do this

  5. ‘Ethics’ in animals

  6. What about human beings? Ethical norms probably part of evolutionary history as a social species. To this extent, humans perhaps not qualitatively different from other animals. BUT – with the ability to debate ethical problems, and construct new ethical codes, it’s no longer a question of instinct. We can deliberate about our actions to ensure we make the ‘ethical’ choice. The question is: how?

  7. Ethics is about right and wrong: what ought one to do? – Socrates Some common fallacies: Ethical questions CAN’T be answered simply by referring to a) empirical facts, b) the law, c) religion, d) majority views. • EG: ‘is euthanasia wrong?’ A1: euthanasia will always happen whatever we think about it A2: Euthanasia is legal in the Netherlands A3: The Catholic church forbids euthanasia A4: Most British people think euthanasia is acceptable. None of these is valid as the sole answer to an ethical question.

  8. Theory and argument: approaches to ethical reasoning In the Western philosophical tradition, ethical questions are explored through philosophical reasoning. Consideration of ethical theory may help in recognising and constructing arguments • Relativism/Subjectivism • Virtue ethics • Consequentialism • Deontology • Four principles Applying ethical approaches – sample question: is euthanasia wrong?

  9. Moral relativism & subjectivism • Relativism: ethics dependent on social context Euthanasia is OK if you live in Switzerland but not in the UK • Were the Nazis right to send 6 million Jews to their deaths? They lived in a place where it was ‘OK’ to do so • Was slavery a good system? It was widely accepted at the time • Subjectivism: ethics is a matter of personal opinion Euthanasia is OK if you think it’s OK • But - our values/choices affect others • Am I entitled to my personal view that slavery is OK? • Or that Jews should be killed?

  10. Aristotle (384 BC – 322 BC) Virtue ethics – balancing between extremes Courage Cowardice Compassion Selfishness Diligence Laziness Temperance Greed WISDOM Would a virtuous doctor perform euthanasia? Would a virtuous patient request it? What sort of person would he/she be?

  11. Only outcomes count • The greatest good for the greatest number • No absolute prohibitions • Ends justify the means • ‘…the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilised community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others.’ • Euthanasia is OK if overall benefit results - could mean killing those who are unprofitable to society? Consequentialism/Utilitarianism Famously associated with John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)

  12. Deontology • Morality is about following rules - consequences are not important. • Some acts are intrinsically wrong. So they are wrong in ALL circumstances. EG, killing. • Means and ends – never treat another human being solely as a means, but always as an end in him/herself. Famously associated with Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) Euthanasia is wrong, as it is the killing of another human being

  13. Core concepts – four principles Autonomy:Greek origin, literally means “self-rule”. “The capacity to make reasoned decisions and act on them” (The New Dictionary of Medical Ethics) . Contrasts with paternalism - assumption that doctor knows best. Respect for autonomy means that the patient’s choices decisions and values are key. Non-maleficence – not doing harm Beneficence – doing good Justice – treating people fairly, without discrimination Does euthanasia respect autonomy? Does it harm the patient? Or benefit them...?

  14. What does respect for autonomy entail? • Respect for people’s mental & physical integrity: • No treatment without consent. • Patients assumed competent unless evidence otherwise • Consent must be freely given & fully informed • Provision of accurate & relevant information • Absolute right to refuse treatment, even if death will result (but no right to demand treatment) • Confidentiality: doctors must not divulge facts about their patients

  15. A critique of autonomy-focussed medicine Degrees of autonomy – gradually attained as children grow older; sometimes gradually lost as adults grow older Critics of autonomy: individualistic, ignores society, disregards relationships, downgrades the doctor’s role?

  16. Ethical conflicts in medicine • Autonomy vs paternalism refusal of treatment • Individual vs society allocating scarce resources • Beneficence vs non-maleficence screening programmes – greater harm than good? • Acts vs outcomes euthanasia, abortion • Objective vs subjective values best interests; quality of life; futility judgements

  17. Ethics is about right and wrong: what ought one to do? – Socrates Ethical questions can’t be answered simply by referring to a) external facts, b) the law, c) religion, d) public opinion. Q: Is euthanasia acceptable?

  18. Challenging an ethical argument Claim: ‘euthanasia is wrong’ Arguments (an argument is a conclusion supported by one or more reasons): • It is wrong to harm people • euthanasia harms people Conclusion: euthanasia is wrong DISAGREE? Show where the argument is flawed…. Potential challenges: ‘Harming people is not always wrong’ – rejects 1st claim ‘Euthanasia does not harm people’ – rejects 2nd claim ‘Euthanasia is not wrong because it harms people, but for other unrelated reasons’ – accepts that the argument is flawed, but suggests the conclusion is justified on separate grounds: need to draw up new argument

  19. Reflective equilibrium GMC: “You are personally accountable for your professional practice and must always be prepared to answer for your decisions and actions” [GMC Good Medical Practice, p1] Where there is an ethical issue, you need to show you’ve a) recognised that there’s a potential problem b) thought through the relevant options c) selected a course of action based on careful, conscientious analysis of the problem

  20. Conclusion Van Rensselaer Potter: need to create professionals with the ‘knowledge of how to use knowledge’[Potter 1971] • Values are diverse + disputed – no factual answers • Moral theories can help but not always conclusive • Reflective equilibrium offers a way of addressing ethical questions, identifying + evaluating ethical assumptions + engaging in ethical debate • Ethical issues extremely broad + cover a wide spectrum of social, ethical + scientific questions • Need to connect scientists & doctors with social & ethical values

  21. References and further reading General Medical Council. Good medical practice. 4th Edition. 2007. London: General Medical Council Beauchamp T L, Childress J F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press. 2001. Boyd, Higg, Pinching (eds). The new dictionary of medical ethics. BMJ. 1997. Rawls J. A theory of justice. OUP. 1999 O’Neill O. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge. University Press, 2002, 30, 83–5. Hope T, Savulescu J et al. Medical ethics and law: the core curriculum. Churchill Livingstone. 2nd Edition. 2008. Potter, V.R. 1971. Bioethics, A bridge to the future. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall. Daniels, Norman, "Reflective Equilibrium", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/reflective-equilibrium/>

More Related