1 / 20

Tim Humphreys Association of British Insurers

Tim Humphreys Association of British Insurers. Workplace Compensation in the UK. ABI Liability Committee. Began review 2 years ago Looked at UK workplace compensation system from viewpoints of all stakeholders 2 components to the system:EL insurance and Industrial Injuries Benefit

hamlet
Download Presentation

Tim Humphreys Association of British Insurers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tim HumphreysAssociation of British Insurers Workplace Compensation in the UK

  2. ABI Liability Committee • Began review 2 years ago • Looked at UK workplace compensation system from viewpoints of all stakeholders • 2 components to the system:EL insurance and Industrial Injuries Benefit • There is little linkage between these 2 components

  3. Employers’ Liability Insurance • Entirely within the commercial insurance system • Compensation is funded through insurance premiums • Claimant must prove negligence • Compensation is relatively generous • Insurance is compulsory • Premium income over £1bn

  4. Industrial Injuries Benefit • State benefit funded by tax • No fault-but 14% disability • Covers accidents and prescribed diseases • Legacy of welfare state • Compensation is very limited • Benefits can be recovered by CRU • Costs £700m per year

  5. Workplace Compensation in other Countries • ABI Liability Committee looked at workplace compensation arrangement around the world, but in particular: • Germany • Holland • Belgium • Summaries of these systems included in ABI response to DWP

  6. Workplace Compensation in Germany • Developed by Bismark • No fault • Prevention,rehabilitation and compensation under one roof • Industry sector mutual providers • Rehabilitation is compulsory • Compensation only after rehabilitation and in the form of benefits or a pension • Employers are exempt from liability • Coherent system but very expensive (8-10bn Euros)

  7. Workplace Compensation in Belgium • No fault • State covers diseases,private sector covers accidents • Employers can only be liable for gross negligence • Insurance Association still sets tariffs for insurers • Rehabilitation is not well developed • Accident /disease split seems to work but the Belgium system seems very bureaucratic

  8. Workplace Compensation in Holland • Disability Benefits payable for work and non work accidents • State pays benefits but top up income protection insurance is common • 1m people are on this benefit(over 10% of the working population) • Employers can still be liable for work injuries so EL is common but not compulsory • EL is claims made and excludes some diseases • Cost of the system to the economy is driving reform-particularly rehabilitation

  9. Fault v No Fault • UK has both fault based and no fault compensation systems • ABI commissioned research into the impact of a switch to no fault • 3 options were considered: • Frugal (no award for pain and suffering,limited awards and scope) • Unconstrained (includes pain and suffering ,wide scope,disputes settled by litigation) • Mid way (limited pain and suffering)

  10. Research Findings • Insurance cost of current arrangements:£1.27bn • Frugal system:£1.43bn • Unconstrained:£4.75bn • Mid way:£3.01bn • Why? Because claims rates are between 3 and 6 times higher in other countries.Litigation is also common in no fault systems • But-return to work schemes can help reduce costs even with a fault based system

  11. Strains on the UK System • For Employers: • Rising premiums • Availability of cover? • Late renewal notices • Insurers don’t differentiate risks? • Lack of communication

  12. Strains in the System • For insurers: • Underwriting losses • Rising claims costs • Falling investment returns • Unpredictable legal environment • Occupational diseases impossible to price?

  13. Result of Strains • Business groups lobby MPs and Government about rising premiums • ABI lobbies Government about the operating environment • DWP and OFT look into liability market • Window of opportunity for reform and change-won’t happen again for a long time

  14. OFT and DWP reports • Measured reports-no market failure,no collusion (following extensive input from ABI and insurers) • DWP agenda: • Enforcement of ELCI • Rehabilitation • Legal costs • Risk related premiums • Separating the funding of occupational diseases

  15. Enforcement of ELCI • AXA survey 13% of businesses are not insured! • DWP and HSE are undertaking their own research to find out extent of this problem • DWP are considering whether a database of ELCI policyholders is needed to ensure compliance • Much will depend on the extent of the problem

  16. Rehabilitation • Government committed to rehabilitation playing a more central role in the UK-but how? • Data on the costs and benefits of rehabilitation for the Government,employers and insurers and the economy is needed • ABI has commissioned some research on this • Need to define what is meant by rehabilitation and where resources can best be deployed • DWP stakeholder meeting likely to be held next month

  17. Legal Costs • 40% of EL claims cost are legal costs • Government looking at alternative dispute resolution and fixed fees • Impact of pre action protocols • Any more radical suggestions?

  18. Risk Related Premiums • ABI has been working with trade associations to identify best practice for health and safety • A panel of insurers will assess trade associations against best practice criteria and give feedback to the association • The ABI assessment will then be circulated to all insurers • Trade associations and their brokers will be able to use the assessment when placing cover • Information should allow insurers to differentiate risks • DWP and HSE support the scheme

  19. Separation of long tail disease claims • ABI and insurers must make the case to DWP for separate funding of long tail disease claims • ABI has commissioned PwC to examine the economic case for separation and the best model for funding these claims • PwC will look at how the market would have performed without occupational disease claims and how it might cope with another asbestos • The impact of occupational disease on the future cost of capital • How the market would operate if occupational disease was removed from the equation

  20. The Way Forward • DWP has set its agenda and ABI is happy with it • The 5 DWP work streams mark the boundaries for debate over the next 6 months • DWP will make a progress report in the Autumn-this will not be a final report-but will report developments like: • Service standards for renewals,trade association initiative,PwC research • Momentum has been built for change • Another opportunity to influence change like the one we have now will not come along for many years

More Related