1 / 14

Leveraging SMEs’ strengths for INSPIRE Dialogue session at Geospatial World Forum, Rotterdam (NL)

Leveraging SMEs’ strengths for INSPIRE Dialogue session at Geospatial World Forum, Rotterdam (NL) 16.05.2013 SEIS & INSPIRE IN ACTION. Giacomo Martirano (Epsilon Italia) g.martirano@epsilon-italia.it. SUMMARY. Who we are and what we are doing (in brief)

hannahwhite
Download Presentation

Leveraging SMEs’ strengths for INSPIRE Dialogue session at Geospatial World Forum, Rotterdam (NL)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Leveraging SMEs’ strengths for INSPIRE Dialogue session at Geospatial World Forum, Rotterdam (NL) 16.05.2013 SEIS & INSPIRE IN ACTION Giacomo Martirano (Epsilon Italia) g.martirano@epsilon-italia.it

  2. SUMMARY • Who we are and what we are doing (in brief) • Tips to stimulate the dialogue session debate • The main barriers we identified • Barriers seen as challenges • Turning challenges into opportunities

  3. Who we are (in brief) • We are a small enterprise specialized in geospatial technologies • We are based in South Italy • We are deeply involved in EU co-funded projects dealing with geospatial information in general and with INSPIRE implementations in particular

  4. What we are doing (in brief) • We are implementing SEIS using INSPIRE • We are involved in the execution of a contract for the implementation at national level of SEIS (Shared Environmental Information System) for 5 themes: Air, Water, Soil, Noise and Radiation. • We are responsible for the design of the SEIS theme-specific geodatabases • We are focusing on INSPIRE EF DS (and on O&M), so more on the data “production” side of the data chain

  5. The main barriers we identified • Organizationalbarriers (within the consortium and with the Client) • Technical barriers • Financial barriers

  6. The main barriers we identified • Organizationalbarrierswithin the consortium: • Misalignment of technicalcompetenciesbetweenpartnersresponsible for the development and furtherintegration of projectcomponentsstrictlycorrelated. • Lack of coordination, bothattechnical and management level

  7. The main barriers we identified • Organizationalbarriers with the Client: • Misalignment of technicalcompetenciesbetween the Client and the Supplier. • Heterogeinity of the organizationalstructures of the Client’sdepartments/agenciesresponsible for the management of the relevantgeospatial information

  8. The main barriers we identified • Technical barriers: • Misalignmentbetweenthe national reporting obligations set by EEA and the INSPIRE obligations set by the Implementing Rules on the interoperability of spatial datasets. • Complexity of data modellingactivitiesneeded to merge the manyapplicableschemasintoone single geodatabase structure for each SEIS theme

  9. The main barriers we identified • Financial barriers: • Competitive tender wonoffering a pricemuchlowerthan the referenceone(- 38 %) • Unfavourablepaymentclauses (30% advancepaymentafter the contractsignature) and 70% balance paymentat the end of a 24 monthsprojectafterfinalacceptance of alldeliverables)

  10. Barriers seen as challenges • Investingin filling-in knowledge gaps: • increasingmanpowerallocation (in terms of 50% FTE) in order to deepen the technical and technologicalaspects • self-training (thoroughanalysis of INSPIRE DS and practice with the data transformationtools and the data harmonisationworkflows)

  11. Barriers seen as challenges • Investingin filling-in communication gaps: • spendingmore effort in supportinglessawarepartners and also the Client • Investingin filling-in cash-flow gaps: • getting from the bank an increased credit limit

  12. Turning challenges into opportunities • The increasedtechnicalcompetencies: • increasedourcompetitiveness • increasedourproductivity • creatednew market opportunities

  13. Conclusions • Not a sales pitchbutrather a networking invitation …

  14. Conclusions • If this is the business model we are aming at … • … then join us at www.smespire.eu

More Related