1 / 10

Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others

Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Presenter: Cindy Mei. Tania Singer, Ben Seymour, John P. O’Doherty, Klaas E. Stephan, Raymond J. Dolan and Chris D. Frith. Introduction. Empathy allows us to share in the emotions, pain and sensations of others

harriet
Download Presentation

Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others Presenter: Cindy Mei Tania Singer, Ben Seymour, John P. O’Doherty, Klaas E. Stephan, Raymond J. Dolan and Chris D. Frith

  2. Introduction • Empathy allows us to share in the emotions, pain and sensations of others • But is this mental or physiological? • If you hurt, I hurt too… Perceived pain in others activates the same brain regions that detect pain in yourself! • anterior insula/fronto-insular cortex (AI/FI) • anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) • But do social relations matter? Does fairness = more empathy? Unfairness = desire for punishment?

  3. Hypothesis • Pain-related empathic responses in AI/FI and ACC will be observed when watching a fair person in pain, but be reduced/absent when watching an unfair person in pain • Also, seeing an unfair person in pain will activate the reward pathways in the brain (punishment / revenge)

  4. Method • 16 men and 16 women • 4 confederates (professional actors, 2 male and 2 female) • Prisoner’s Dilemma game • Used to create “fair” or “unfair” responses by the confederates • fMRI scans to determine activation of: • Empathic systems (AI/FI and ACC) • Reward Pathway—”revenge” (nucleus accumbens (NA))

  5. Experimental Task No Pain or Painful shocks • Applied randomly to all 3 participants • Scan to see activation of AI/FI/ACC and NA Prisoner's Dilemma Game • Afterwards: questionnaires on Standard Empathy Scale, how much they liked the confederates and how much they wanted revenge

  6. Results - Empathy ACC • Men & Women – increased empathy for pain in fair players • Men – decreased empathy for pain in unfair players FI

  7. Results - Punishment • Men only – increased desire for revenge = increased activation of NA

  8. Discussion • Provides neurobiological evidence on how fairness affects social interactions between people • Cooperation = increased empathy • Selfishness = decreases empathy and increases desire for punishment (in males) • Like working with fair opponents • Want to punish unfair opponents • Could indicate that men have a larger role in the desire to maintain justice and punishment in society

  9. Strengths and Limitations • Strengths • Used male and female subjects • Tested for both empathy and no-empathy (and punishment) • Limitations • Tested only empathy for pain, what about for emotions like happiness or sadness? • Further research? • Investigate more in the gender specificity of the “punishment” pathway • Psychological or financial punishment more appealing to women? • Empathy for known players who are fair or unfair?

  10. Questions?

More Related