1 / 26

NHRC Capability Brief AMAL Modernization IDC Curriculum Review/Conference 13 – 15 May 2013

NHRC Capability Brief AMAL Modernization IDC Curriculum Review/Conference 13 – 15 May 2013. Discussion Points. NHRC Modeling and Simulation past performance. Medical Modeling and Simulation research program goals. Key aspects of review results. NHRC’s suite of planning tools.

harvey
Download Presentation

NHRC Capability Brief AMAL Modernization IDC Curriculum Review/Conference 13 – 15 May 2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NHRC Capability Brief AMAL Modernization IDC Curriculum Review/Conference13 – 15 May 2013

  2. Discussion Points • NHRC Modeling and Simulation past performance. • Medical Modeling and Simulation research program goals. • Key aspects of review results. • NHRC’s suite of planning tools. • How are models constructed? • Current projects.

  3. NHRC Modeling and Simulation History Developed RSVP for MCF submissions ESP available on the web; Quarterly updates provided LMI provides assessment of medical M&S tools (JMLIS) ONR sponsored Med Log study NHRC began updating DMSB TTT files Patient data expanded to include HA/DR PCOF Tool accredited for Joint use EMRE and CURCIT Tools Developed ESP developed Development History Expeditionary Medicine Knowledge Warehouse • 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 • 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 Mapping PCs to ICD-9s Included logistics data and died of wounds algorithm in TML+ EESP for data warehouse development JMPT Accredited as Joint solution for medical planning EESP used to evaluate CNAF Growler Wing Capability USMC AMAL baselined IDC/GMO AMAL evaluated using ESP Air Force sponsor UTC review using ESP methodology

  4. Medical Modeling and Simulation Research Program Goals • Develop deliberate and crisis action planning tools for medical providers, planners, and logisticians • Evaluate current and develop new expeditionary medical capabilities for the range of military operations • Conduct deployment health studies and develop casualty estimation methodologies and tools using the Theater Medical Data Store (TMDS) and Hybrid Database

  5. Key Aspects of Review Results • Provides a systematic review methodology • Clinical Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) define/validate clinical requirements and prescribed clinical standards of care • All relevant stakeholders (i.e. clinicians, medical planners, biomedical repair technicians, logisticians, life cycle managers) are involved in the process • Provides an audit trail for each recommended materiel component • Recommended revisions justified and linked to specific clinical task(s) and ICD-9(s) • Clinical and logistical impacts of supply and equipment deletions, additions or changes made visible • Merges clinical and logistics data, all data available for use in other models (JMPT)

  6. Key Aspects of Review Results • NHRC published technical report provides a recommended logistics template based on the validated clinical capability requirements • Methodology shown to be an effective tool used by USMC, USN and USAF in medical material development and management • Relational database is flexible to enable scenario defined computations • EMedKW modifications made by NHRC or by using the maintenance tool in the program • Casualty rate projections used in other modeling tools • All EMedKW data used in JMPT to conduct medical risk assessment studies and analysis

  7. NHRC’s Medical Modeling Suite EMedKW Store underlying data

  8. Full range of acute, convalescent, restorative, and rehabilitative care Definitive Capability Modular hospitals with surgical capabilities required to support the theater Theater Hospitalization Capability En Route Care Capability Forward advanced emergency medical treatment performed Forward Resuscitative Capability Medical care rendered at the point of initial injury or illness First Responder Capability Taxonomy Continuum of Health Care Capabilities

  9. Patient Encounter Data Development and Refinement

  10. ICD9 Clinical Basis for Supplies

  11. SME Contribution Construct Appropriate MTF Model Endurance Requirements ROC/POE, etc SME Input Rate x PAR Patient Stream • Noro-like • Disease Outbreak • PCOF • Rate • Patient stream SME Rvw SME Rvw SME Rvw SME Rvw DNBI EMedKW Estimating Supplies Program (ESP) Class Specific DNBI PCOFs Presentation Data • Mass Casualty • UNDEX & AIREX • PCOF • Rate • Patient stream PASBA AHLTA TMDS Etc. Task Profiles SME Rvw Task/supply links SME involvement and participation is ESSENTIAL Current AMAL SME Input • - Identify shortfalls, surpluses, redundancies, and obsolescent • Develop Proposed Material Item List • - Calculate weight, cost, and volume • - Evaluate commonality (Service, JPOC, JDF) Promulgate New AMAL SME Rvw

  12. Process Flow Model and Data Development Customer/SME Review Material Item List (MIL) Developed Detailed Study Plan Reporting Phase Discovery Phase Analysis Phase Kick Off Meeting Deliver Final TR Customer Feedback MIL Refinement 30 Days ACA MIL Accepted ? No 1-2 Mos ACA Yes 1-2 Mos 1-2 Mos 4-6 Mos

  13. Discovery Phase • This phase includes: • Review of published journal literature • Review of official doctrine and policy • Review of operational requirements documents • Review of AAR and medical lessons learned • Discussion with experienced subject matter experts

  14. Data Collection • This phase includes: • Patient presentation data from JTTR, TMDS, AHLTA, and GEMS • UICs can be used to specify unit types (SME input) • De-identified patient data analyzed by NHRC statisticians • Patient data reviewed by appropriate SMEs

  15. SME Review: AMAL Considerations • Is AMAL capability based on PAR or patient load(i.e., 50 casualties)? • What is the required endurance without resupply(15 days, 30 days, etc.)? • What is the level of care and skills of the MTF and its personnel? • Are there weight and cube restrictions?

  16. Establish Patient Stream • This includes: • Patient condition occurrence frequencies (PCOFs) are developed from collected patient data • The population at risk for a CVN is 5200 • Historically speaking 11% of a PAR reports for a 30 day period, the expected casualty stream is 572 • The patient stream is a function of 572 draws on the PCOF

  17. Modeling phase • This includes: • Development of clinical tasks needed to treat occurring ICD-9s • Review and validation of clinical task list by SMEs • Completion of model construction

  18. Analysis Phase • This phase includes: • Multiple model runs will determine any supply excesses or shortages in AMAL. • Statistical analysis used to determine average usage of each supply item. • NHRC consults with meets with the customer to determine risk analysis confidence level (normally 85th percentile). • Decision: are any revisions needed? • YES – return to SME review. • NO – new line list is finalized.

  19. Reporting Phase • This phase includes: • Authoring technical document documenting the process used to create the AMAL, and a detailed line list identifying supply item additions, deletions, increases or decreases, and the reason for each change. • Draft report submitted to sponsor while report is vetted by NHRC and BUMED editing process. • Final report delivered to sponsor.

  20. AMAL Modernization Efforts Status • FY12 • Air Expeditionary AMAL (Prowler/Growler dets, etc) – CNAF • Afloat DNBI Phase One Study (SSN, CG, CVN) – NMLC • FY13 • CVN AMAL Modernization review – CNAF • AFLOAT AMAL Modernization - NMLC • CRUDES (CG, DDG, FFG) • Small Combatant (MCM, PC, LCS) • Submarine (SSN, SSBN, SSGN) • Amphibious role 1 (LPD, LHD) • FY14 • T-AH AMAL Standardization – FFC? • Two year effort due to scope • LHA, LPD17 role 2 Modernization – NMLC? • Adaptive Force Packages • ERSS • AEGIS Ashore • FY14 and beyond • AMAL Maintenance support Complete Complete In Progress Start Imminent 1 year PoP Proposed

  21. Backup Slides

  22. Joint Medical Planning Tool Kit

  23. Process Flow and Timeline Discovery Phase: Determine patient types (wounded in action, non-battle injury, and disease), LOC, FAs, latest AMAL/AS, ROC/POE, new equipment/supplies/TTPs, research lessons learned and each line item; SME review by medical professionals; expected types of injuries and how many of each is likely to occur; SME review. Model and Data Development Phase: Based on information and data developed during Discovery, appropriate MTF and functional area models built in EMedKW. During this phase patient streams based on PAR, and rate information are derived from PCOF and CRESTT to establish patient stream; reviewed by/with SMEs. Analysis Phase: Using a deterministic modeling program (ESP) supply estimates based on patient streams, ROC and POE are derived. The Material Item List (MIL) is developed at the NSN level and metrics including additions, deletions, increases, and decreases are provided. Cost, weight and volume changes are computed. Reporting Phase: A technical report is developed to formally document the process and results of the review. Appendices detail all supplies and reasons for deletion, addition, reduction, and increase.

  24. Why Allowance Standards Need Maintenance • Changes in standards of care • The forward-deployed environment is dynamic • Updated tactics, techniques, and procedures • New weaponry, threats, environments • Modified personal protective equipment • Adapted treatment protocols • Introduction of improved medical supplies and equipment • The imperative to facilitate/advance standardization • Between services and across the ROMO • Continuous modernization of supplies & equipment • Example: Combat Application Tourniquet (CAT), a one handed, more effective item named one of the Army’s 10 Greatest Inventions for 2005

  25. Benefits of Modeling and Simulation • Standardized, science-based, repeatable methodology • Compatible with MCRW • Provides new/updated baseline PCOFs to MCRW • Capable of filling current shipboard PCOF gap • Inventories based on clinical necessity • Supports routine AMAL maintenance cycle • Reduces cost • Enhances standardization (JPOC, JDF, Service)

  26. Expeditionary Medical Knowledge Warehouse Inputs Physiological Models Medical Equipment & Consumables Patient Record Database Mortality Curves NMLC CTR TMDS Patient Condition Treatment Briefs Navy/USMC Medical Lessons Learned DMMPO NOMI Doctrine & Mission Requirements Casualty Rates CASEST FORECAS MCCDC (CD&I)/NWDC Enterprise Estimating Supplies Program (ESP) In Development Expeditionary Medicine Requirements Estimator (EMRE) Patient Condition Frequency Occurrence (PCOF) Tool Re-Supply Validation Program (RSVP) In Development Combat Intensity Rate Calculator & Injury Type (CIRCIT) Tool Human Injury and Treatment (HIT) Outputs Joint Medical Planning Tool (JMPT)

More Related