POLITENESS AND INDIRECT SPEECH ACTS, HONORIFICS AND THREE TYPES, SPEECH ACTS IN SIGN LANGUAGES.

1. POLITENESS AND INDIRECT SPEECH ACTS, • HONORIFICS AND THREE TYPES, • SPEECH ACTS IN SIGN LANGUAGES. Meltem ATAKAY Ferhat ÇALBAY Cansu MEYANCI

2. Politeness and indirect speech acts When people interact, identities and senses of selves are jostling for attention. • A central concept in pragmatics is the concept of face, that is, the public self-image that we all want to maintain.

3. Face is something that is emotionally invested, and that can be lost, maintained, orenhanced, and must be constantly attended to in interaction (a term ultimately derived from the Englishexpression ‘to lose face’).

4. There are two aspects to the concept of face: 1- The negative face, which basically denotes the need to be independent and free from imposition, 2- The positive face, which, very simplified, denotes the need to belong and be accepted.

5. to save someone’s negative face, If we want help from somebody, we might phrase the request with an initial face saving phrase, EXP: Excuse me, … or I’m sorry to bother you... * saving someone’s positive face, EXP: to increase the sense of group belonging.

6. Politeness : It is a way of interaction which shows awareness of and respect for someone else’s face. • A face threatening act: It is an act that threatens the integrity and self-image of another person. For example, giving someone a direct order such as, Sit down! and be quiet! implies having social power over that person.

7. It is acceptable for a parent to give his or her child a direct order, but giving a direct order to your colleague or neighbour is in general a face threatening act and therefore not acceptable. Conversely, if we act or behave in a way that lessens a possible threat to another person’s face, we engage in a face saving act.

8. One common strategy is to use an inclusive we, thereby reducing the request into a common act. Exp: ‘Should we sit down and continue? where the question removes the assumption of social power (for instance, by implying that the addressee has the theoretical option to answer however he pleases) and therefore maintains the balance of face.

9. There’s a fine balance to these kinds of strategies though: an inclusive we can very easily sound ironic and get a superior tone, thereby becoming a face threatening rather than face saving device.

10. Face saving device: It is to use indirect speech acts to achieve our purposes. • In an indirect speech act the content of the utterance does not correspond to the speaker’s intention of the utterance. • The real purpose of the utterance is to get someone to do something for us (i.e. it is an indirect command)

11. Misunderstanding between individuals and cultures when it comes to interpreting speech acts. What is polite for one person might not be for the other, and so on.

12. Indirect speech acts • Speech acts may be either direct or indirect. • In a direct speech act the content oftheutterance matches the speaker’s intention of the utterance. • the declarative is simply a statement uttered with the purpose of giving information, • the interrogative is simply a question uttered with the purpose of getting information, • the imperative is simply a command with the purpose of getting someone to do something.

13. A parent can pretty safely issue a direct command to his or her child while the child still lives at home. • A military commander can pretty safely issue a direct command to a soldier. There might be situations where close friends can give each other direct commands. But it is rarely useful for an employee to give a direct command to his or her boss, or for a host to order his or her guests about (or the guests the host, for that matter). * Therefore we engage in various politeness strategies.

14. In indirect speech acts, we actually do not mean exactly what we say. EXP-1: Do you know where the library is? as a command (Tell me where the library is), Yes, thank you, I know where it is. *to use declaratives and interrogatives as politely disguised requests (or commands). *

15. as a conclusion • Giving someone a direct command, implies that we either have power over or are very intimate with that person. • Social situations involve complex structures of cooperation: we might want to achieve something, but we also have to take into account that we are surrounded by others whom we do not want to offend.

16. HONOROFICS:The linguistic politeness devices. 1. Referent Honorifics 2. Addressee Honorifics 3. BystanderHonorifics

17. Referenthonorifics • Thechoice of linguistic form is dependent on what is referredto. • Binarydistinction: FamiliarvsPolite • Forexample, ‘tu/vous’ T/V pronounsreferto a singleperson in French distinction. • 49 of 207 languagesusethisbinarydistinction.

18. Differentlevels of T/V pronouns: InGerman, thepolite form Sie is thestandard form of address. • InSwedish, thepluralpronoun form niis usedtoaddress a singleperson. • Multiplepolitenessdistinction:

19. ‘PronounAvoidance’ • Indonesianlanguage: saudara: sibling, bapak: father, ibu: mother. • Pidginandcreolelanguagesaresimilartonon-creoleswithrespecttopolitenessdistinction in pronouns.

20. Honorificdistinction in thethirdperson.

21. Addresseehonorifics • Thechoice of thelinguistic form is dependent on theaddressee of theutterance.

23. InJavaneselanguage, thechoice of vocabulary is addresseehonorific. • Speech levels: ngoko (informal) madyô (semi-polite) krômô (polite) • Respectvocabulary: krômôinggél krômôandap

24. Bystanderhonorifics • Thelinguistic form of thelanguage is dependent on who is withinearshot of theutterance. • Taboorelatives

26. The ‘sidewayslanguage’ demandsthesuffix-lawuon thenoun (nguk‘tobacco’) andtheverb is inflected in thepluraleventhoughtheutteranceonly has a singleaddressee.

27. SPEECH ACTS IN SIGN LANGUAGES

28. InSignLanguages: • Declaratives 2. Interrogatives 3. Imperatives NegativeDeclaratives • NegativeParticles: Independentfromsigns. • NegativeIntonation: Non-manualnegativemarkers.

29. Non-manualNegatives: • HeadMovements 1.1 A repeatedside-to-sideheadshake 1.2 A singleside-wardheadturn 1.3 A backwardtilt of thehead 2. FacialExpressions 2.1 Negativemimics

30. IrregularNegatives: Negations in non-standardways : Havesmallnumber : Not Indepedent BSL (Sign Language: UK) Evalution: NOT.GOOD;NOT.POSSIBLE Cognition: NOT.KNOW;NOT.UNDERSTAND Emotionalattitude: NOT.WANT;NOT.LIKE;NOT.AGREE; NOT.BELIEVE PossessionandExistentials: NOT.HAVE;NOT.EXIST Tense andaspect: WILL.NOT;NOT.FINISHED

32. InRegularNegatives; Indo-PakistaniSign Language (IPSL) neg BOOK THIS INTERESTING NOT ‘Thisbook is not interesting.’ InIrregularNegatives; South KoreanSign Language neg WAY NOT-KNOW ‘I don’tknowtheway.’

33. Interrogatives in SignLanguages: • Polar Questions: Yes – No Questions :Almostall SL have :WithNon-manualsorQuestionParticles(Optional) • Content Questions: Wh- Questions : Morethan Polar Questions : WithNon-manualandQuestionwords, orNon-manualsonly

34. In Polar Questions; TSL (Sign Language: Thailand) __________pol.q SMOKE INDEX2? ‘Do yousmoke?’

35. In Content Questions; AmericanSign Language (ASL) wh- JOHN BUY YESTERDAY WHAT ‘Whatdid John buy yesterday?’

36. ImperativesInSignLanguages; AmericanSign Language (ASL) NOW START EAT DeletedSubject ‘Start eatingnow!’ Frowning, Wrincklednose • InNegativeImperatives; A Special Sign: DO.NOT!

37. THANK YOU FOR LISTENING.