1 / 32

IT420: Database Management and Organization

IT420: Database Management and Organization. Storage and Indexing 14 April 2006 Adina Cr ă iniceanu www.cs.usna.edu/~adina. From Last Time: Transaction Log. Goals. Storage Indexing. Disks and Files. Basic data abstraction - File - collection of records

hchick
Download Presentation

IT420: Database Management and Organization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IT420: Database Management and Organization Storage and Indexing 14 April 2006 Adina Crăiniceanu www.cs.usna.edu/~adina

  2. From Last Time: Transaction Log Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  3. Goals • Storage • Indexing Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  4. Disks and Files • Basic data abstraction - File - collection of records • Record id (rid) is sufficient to physically locate record/row in a file • DBMS store data on (“hard”) disks • Why not main memory? • Why not tapes? • Data is stored and retrieved in units called disk blocksor pages. • Unlike RAM, time to retrieve a disk page varies depending upon location on disk. • Therefore, relative placement of pages on disk has major impact on DBMS performance! Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  5. Components of a Disk • The platters spin (say, 90rps). • The arm assembly is moved in or out to position a head on a desired track. • Tracks under heads make • a cylinder (imaginary!). • Only one head reads/writes at any one time. • Block sizeis a multiple • of sector size(which is fixed). Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  6. Accessing a Disk Page • Time to access (read/write) a disk block: • seek time(moving arms to position disk head on track) • rotational delay(waiting for block to rotate under head) • transfer time(actually moving data to/from disk surface) • Seek time and rotational delay dominate. • Seek time varies from about 1 to 20msec • Rotational delay varies from 0 to 10msec • Transfer rate is about 1msec per 4KB page • Key to lower I/O cost: reduce seek/rotation delays! Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  7. Arranging Pages on Disk • `Next’ block concept: • blocks on same track, followed by • blocks on same cylinder, followed by • blocks on adjacent cylinder • Blocks in a file should be arranged sequentially on disk (by `next’), to minimize seek and rotational delay. Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  8. Class Exercise • Consider a disk with: • average seek time of 15 milliseconds • average rotational delay of 6 milliseconds • transfer time of 0.5 milliseconds/page • Page size = 1024 bytes • File: 200,000 records of 100 bytes each, no record spans 2 pages • Find: • Number of pages needed to store the file • Time to read all records sequentially • Time to read all records in some random order Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  9. Class Exercise Solution • 1 page- at most 10 records [1024/100]. • 200,000 records  20,000 (200,000/10) disk pages needed • 20,000 * transfer time for one page = 20,000 * 0.5 = 10,000 milliseconds • for each record - bring an entire page in memory • If reading each page incurs average seek time and average rotational delay, the time to read one page at random is • tb = average seek time + average rotational delay + transfer time • tb = 15 + 6 + 0.5 = 21.5 milliseconds. • To read 200,000 records we need 200,000 * tb = 200,000 * 21.5 = • 4,300,000 milliseconds = 4300s Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  10. Alternative File Organization • File organization: Method of arranging a file of records on external storage. • Record id (rid) is sufficient to physically locate record/row in a file • Many alternatives exist, each ideal for some situations, and not so good in others: • Heap (random order) files: Suitable when typical access is a file scan retrieving all records. • Sorted Files: Best if records must be retrieved in some order, or only a `range’ of records is needed. • Indexes: Data structures to organize records via trees or hashing. • Like sorted files, they speed up searches for a subset of records, based on values in certain (“search key”) fields • Updates are much faster than in sorted files. Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  11. Motivation for Indexes • Large files • Need to search efficiently for some data Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  12. Indexes • Anindexon a file speeds up selections on the search key columns • Any subset of the columns of a table can be the search key for an index on the table • Search key is not the same as key (minimal set of columns that uniquely identify a row in a table). • An index contains a collection of data entries, and supports efficient retrieval of all data entries k* with a given search key value k. Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  13. Alternatives for Data Entries k* • Three alternatives: • Data record with key value k • <k, rid of row with search key value k> • <k, list of rids of rows with search key k> • Choice of alternative for data entries is orthogonal to the indexing technique used to locate data entries with a given key value k. • Examples of indexing techniques: B+ trees, hash based structures • Typically, index contains auxiliary information that directs searches to the desired data entries Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  14. Index Classification • Primaryvs. secondary: If search key contains • primary key, then called primary index. • Unique index: Search key contains a candidate key. • Clusteredvs. unclustered: If order of data records is the same as, or `close to’, order of data entries, then called clustered index. • Alternative 1 implies clustered; in practice, clustered also implies Alternative 1 (since sorted files are rare). • A file can be clustered on at most one search key. • Cost of retrieving data records through index varies greatly based on whether index is clustered or not! Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  15. Clustered vs. Unclustered Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  16. Hash Based Indexes • Good for equality selections. • Index is a collection of buckets. Bucket = primary page plus zero or more overflow pages. • Hashing function h: • h(r) = bucket in which record r belongs. • h looks at the search key fields of r. • If Alternative (1) is used, the buckets contain the data records; otherwise, they contain <key, rid> or <key, rid-list> pairs. Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  17. Hash Index Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  18. B+ Tree Indexes • Leaf pages contain data entries, and are chained (prev & next) • Non-leaf pages contain index entriesand direct searches: Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  19. Example B+ Tree • Find 28*? 29*? All > 15* and < 30* • Insert/delete: Find data entry in leaf, then change it. Need to adjust parent sometimes. • Change sometimes bubbles up the tree Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  20. SQL to Create Index • CREATE [UNIQUE] INDEX index_name [USING index_type] ON tbl_name (col_name,...) Example: CREATE INDEX I_ItemPrice USING BTREE ON Items (Price) SELECT * FROM Items WHERE Price between 5 and 10 SELECT * FROM Items WHERE ItemID = 100111 Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  21. Understanding the Workload • For each query in the workload: • Which tables does it access? • Which columns are retrieved? • Which columns are involved in selection/join conditions? How selective are these conditions likely to be? • For each update in the workload: • Which columns are involved in selection/join conditions? How selective are these conditions likely to be? • The type of update (INSERT/DELETE/UPDATE), and the columns that are affected. Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  22. Choice of Indexes • What indexes should we create? • Which tables should have indexes? What column(s) should be the search key? Should we build several indexes? • For each index, what kind of an index should it be? • Clustered? Hash/tree? Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  23. Choice of Indexes (Cont.) • One approach: Consider the most important queries in turn. Consider the best plan using the current indexes, and see if a better plan is possible with an additional index. If so, create it. • Obviously, this implies that we must understand how a DBMS evaluates queries and creates query evaluation plans! • For now, we discuss simple 1-table queries. • Before creating an index, must also consider the impact on updates in the workload! • Trade-off: Indexes can make queries go faster, updates slower. Require disk space, too. Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  24. Index Selection Guidelines • Columns in WHERE clause are candidates for index keys. • Exact match condition suggests hash index. • Range query suggests tree index. • Clustering is especially useful for range queries; can also help on equality queries if there are many duplicates. • Try to choose indexes that benefit as many queries as possible. • Since only one index can be clustered per relation, choose it based on important queries that would benefit the most from clustering. Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  25. Examples • B+ tree index on E.age can be used to get qualifying tuples. • How selective is the condition? • Is the index clustered? • Consider the GROUP BY query. • If many tuples have E.age > 10, using E.age index and sorting the retrieved tuples may be costly. • Clustered E.dno index may be better! • Equality queries and duplicates: • Clustering on E.hobby helps! Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  26. Indexes with Composite Search Keys • Composite Search Keys: Search on a combination of fields. • Equality query: Every field value is equal to a constant value. E.g.: • age=20 and sal =75 • Range query: Some field value is not a constant. E.g.: • age =20; or age=20 and sal > 10 • Data entries in index sorted by search key to support range queries. Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  27. Composite Search Keys • To retrieve Emp records with age=30 AND sal=4000, an index on <age,sal> would be better than an index on age or an index on sal. • If condition is: 20<age<30 AND 3000<sal<5000: • Clustered tree index on <age,sal> or <sal,age> is best. • If condition is: age=30 AND 3000<sal<5000: • Clustered <age,sal> index much better than <sal,age> index! • Composite indexes are larger, updated more often. Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  28. Index Selection Guidelines (Cont.) • Multi-attribute search keys should be considered when a WHERE clause contains several conditions. • Order of attributes is important for range queries. • Such indexes can sometimes enable index-only strategies for important queries. • For index-only strategies, clustering is not important! Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  29. Class Exercise What index would you construct? 1. SELECT * FROM Mids WHERE Company=02 2. SELECT CourseID, Count(*) FROM StudentsEnroll WHERE Company = 02 GROUP BY CourseID Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  30. Summary • Many alternative file organizations exist, each appropriate in some situation. • If selection queries are frequent, sorting the file or building an index is important. • Hash-based indexes only good for equality search. • Sorted files and tree-based indexes best for range search; also good for equality search. (Files rarely kept sorted in practice; B+ tree index is better.) • Index is a collection of data entries plus a way to quickly find entries with given key values. Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  31. Summary (Cont.) • Data entries can be actual data records, <key,rid> pairs, or <key, rid-list> pairs. • Choice orthogonal to indexing technique used to locate data entries with a given key value. • Can have several indexes on a given file of data records, each with a different search key. • Indexes can be classified as clustered vs. unclustered, primary vs. secondary. Differences have important consequences for utility/performance. Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

  32. Database Tuning with Indexes • Understanding the nature of the workload for the application, and the performance goals, is essential to developing a good design. • What are the important queries and updates? What attributes/tables are involved? • Indexes must be chosen to speed up important queries (and perhaps some updates!). • Index maintenance overhead on updates to key columns. • Choose indexes that can help many queries, if possible. • Build indexes to support index-only strategies. • Clustering is an important decision; only one index on a given relation can be clustered! • Order of columns in composite index key - important Ramakrishnan, Gehrke: Database Management Systems

More Related