1 / 11

AAP Review – SCRF Introduction

AAP Review – SCRF Introduction. Akira Yamamoto Project Manager, SCRF To be presented, April 19, 2009. SCRF Cavity Major Goals. Technical Areas and Groups. Engineering and Scientific Management 25 (16 below PM) 7 Asia 7 EU 11 Americas. L.Lilje >> R. Geng. Susanna Guiducci (infn).

Download Presentation

AAP Review – SCRF Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. AAP Review – SCRFIntroduction Akira Yamamoto Project Manager, SCRF To be presented, April 19, 2009 AAP-SCRF-Introduction

  2. SCRF Cavity Major Goals SCRF Cavity R&D for ILC

  3. Technical Areas and Groups Engineering and Scientific Management 25 (16 below PM) 7 Asia 7 EU 11 Americas L.Lilje >> R. Geng Susanna Guiducci (infn) ILC Global Design Effort

  4. Context Give by AAP AAP-SCRF-Introduction

  5. AAP Review Context for SCRF AAP-SCRF-Introduction

  6. Response from AAP for SCRF The SRF R&D started with a well-laid out international R&D plan, which required the intricate interaction of the participating laboratories already in the phase of the Reference Design Report. Goals defined during that phase have been elaborated in an often demanding decision process. Naturally, as time went on priorities shifted and so did the R&D activities. How did and does the process affect the readiness for the decision process of the gradient? What level of confidence can be reached in the various technical areas? It would be beneficial for the committee to have a short introductory review of the critical R&D gradient goals for TDP 1 and 2 and their timelines, with mention of targets for number of cycles/number of cavities, and number of cryomodules, as laid out in the TDP document. The status report should cover activities in both cavity and cryomodule gradients. On the continuing R&D Plan, there is a need to discuss fully how the gaps between the current status for cavity gradients and the goals for TDP phases 1 and 2 will be addressed. For example: AAP-SCRF-Introduction

  7. Specific Questions by AAP AAP-SCRF-Introduction

  8. Questions Continued; Plug-Compatibility AAP-SCRF-Introduction

  9. SCRF Session Agenda, April 19 AAP-SCRF-Introduction

  10. backup AAP-SCRF-Introduction

  11. AAP Review General Agenda AAP-SCRF-Introduction

More Related